Obama's Cigarette Tax Puts the Lie To His No New Taxes Pledge

April 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Former Sen. Russell Long, the Louisiana Democrat who for years headed the powerful Senate Finance Committee, used to say that the strategy for increasing federal revenues was grounded in a time-honored D.C. maxim: "Don't tax you. Don't tax me. Tax that fella' behind the tree."

In essence, what Long was talking about was finding ways to tax "someone else," ideally someone who was not in a position to complain about it much or, even better, exact retribution in the voting booth.

As long as "that fella' behind the tree" had money, it worked as a strategy. Unfortunately for a lot of people, it doesn't work anymore. And it can't, because federal borrowing and spending are, as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product, rising too high.

In just a few months President Obama and a Congress controlled by the Democrats have increased non-defense discretionary spending by 8 percent, and then by an additional 10 percent and then by who knows once Congress finishes with the budget. The national debt, says the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, will double over the next five years. And triple not too much longer after that.

To balance the books, Obama and the Democrats are going to have to find sources for new revenue—which is the polite way to say "Raise taxes."

This effort to find new revenues should be frustrated by what Obama said was his "firm pledge" not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000.00 a year. "Under my plan," Obama said September 12, 2008 in Dover, N.H., "no family making less than $250,000.00 a year will see any form of tax increase." To emphasize the point he continued, "Not your income taxes, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."

He might have well said, "Read my lips." Like a bad April Fools' Day joke, the federal excise tax on cigarettes increased April 1, 2009 by 156 percent (or 61 cents per pack). And this is a tax that everyone who smokes will pay, despite the fact that, according to the taxpayers' lobby Americans for Tax Reform, one in four smokers live below the poverty line and 55 percent of smokers can be defined as "working poor," which means they make something less than $250,000.00 per year.

For all the talk of "repealing the Bush tax cuts" and "increasing the taxes on the wealthiest Americans," there is just not enough money in that economic cohort—even at tax rates that are confiscator—to pay the bills. But no worries. It is now clear that what Obama said, with apologies to the late Sam Goldwyn, wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
smoking and tobacco,
taxes,
federal taxes,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (41)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The best way to to get back at them is to order tobaco products on line

They come from european makers so all the money will go over there and all the fat cat law makers and antismokeing zelouts won't get one penny

Taxed enought of GA 6:51PM March 08, 2010

ITS NOT FAIR TO DEMAND THE SMOKERS IN THIS COUNTRY, TO PAY AN INCREASE IN CIGARETTE TAX ON EVERY PACK THEY BUY,TO FUND PROGRAMS, THE SMOKERS ARE ONLY PART OF THE CITIZENS LIVING IN THIS COUNTRY, WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT DONT SMOKE, THEY GET OUT OF PAYING AN EXTRA SALES TAX,WHERS IS THE SMOKERS CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY CONSITUITIONAL RIGHTS, THATS PART OF ARE FREEDOM CITIZENS RIGHTS TAKEN AWAY.

BRENDA of OH 3:17AM January 26, 2010

ITS NOT FAIR TO RAISE TAXES ON CIGGRETTES, WHAT ABOUT RAISEING THE GOVERNMENT SALES TAS ON LIQUOR AND BEER SALES,THAT WOULD LOWER THE AUTO ACCIDENTS EACH YEAR, CAUSED BY DRUNGS DRIVING, CAUSEING ACCIDENTS AND PEOPLES LIVES,WHICH WOULD HELP THE GOVERNMENT BUDGET WITH A LIQUOR AND BEER TAX, AND THE DRUGS,WOULD STAY OFF THE ROADS, CAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO PAY MORE FOR BEER AND LIQUOR,THE DRUNKS WOULD QUIT BUYING,AND GET THERE HEALTH CLEANED UP.

BRENDA of OH 3:00AM January 26, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Mary Kate Cary

Politics 101 for the GOP

Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and the rest of the GOP pack are not so far apart.

Latest Video

advertisement