The Benefits and Drawbacks of the Keystone XL Pipeline

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Listen to the Party of Do Nothing for America's Benefit

they keep broadcasting that it will cure our energy problems...

Just like those big Tax Breaks did for America and the Worlds economy.

Only ok it if we put limits on the amount of oil that can be exported out of America.

Period!

willy n of AZ 9:51PM October 22, 2012

I do not see any way this is going to reduce America's Energy Dependence on foreign oil.

It is for the benefit of Canadian oil companies and investors and at the expense of America and its citizens.

It is just increased our dirty oil for the oil company profits.

Oil to be shipped out of this country to foreign countries.

Put a very large tax on it and on the oil that is being exported out of the USA. We export lots of oil for other countries.

DO it NOW.

willy n of AZ 3:08PM October 22, 2012

ya thats what i thought

name of MT 10:00AM October 11, 2012

In addition to my above comment. Look what is happening to all the oil above Alaska. BP has it all. Our workers risk their lives in -60 degree weather and BP owns it. Will America politicians and billionaires sell us "down the drain." Stop!

Karen McLaury scott of AL 11:29PM February 18, 2012

Is Keystone Pipeline merely a justification for I-35 to provide a corridor to open Canada and Mexico transportation and to allow more and more complexity to our already failed economy? Joining our nation any further to Mexico and to their unqualified trucks which come onto our highways is ridiculous. To study this in detail see Jerome R. Corsi, PH.D from Harvard's "America For Sale, Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty." p.167-183. Hasn't "free trade," The FEDS, and The NYSE done enough damage for the moment?

Karen McLaury scott of AL 11:25PM February 18, 2012

jim i love people whose minds are run by science fact and logic unfettered by political affiliation or religious delusions, i being a steam turbine mechanic , and millwright could give you a few more pointers and facts that most will never know, about the power generation industry, we will discuss this subject sometime over coffee.

david raye of MO 6:58AM February 14, 2012

Currently Gulf Coast (Texas) is exporting crude oil as well as refined products. The opening of the Eagleford Shale has refineries here with more oil than they can refine. There is in progress a pipeline from that area to Corpus Christi refineries. That distance is closer to 100 miles, rather than 1600 miles for the Keystone XL pipeline. This oil, (Eagleford) is easier to extract, cheaper and easier to refine than the Canadian tar sands oil.

There basically is no need for more oil to refine.

However, giving the Canadian companies access to our ports and overseas markets would be a big thing. To THEM.

Bill Wade of TX 10:40AM January 25, 2012

Nonsense about international buyers for Canadian oil.

Refineries there now rely on overseas imports that are increasingly being tapped by China and India. That can’t happen to the same degree to Canadian crude — all because of NAFTA.

The trade deal includes a “proportionality clause” that bars Canada from reducing its oil and gas shipments to the U. S. while increasing its domestic supply.

“We looked at whether Canada could reduce exports for the sake of conservation or environmental policy . . . or even for household heating. We cannot,” said John Dillon, co-author of a report on the issue published by the University of Alberta’s Parkland Institute and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

But Canada might want to change all that if American politicians insist on renegotiating the trade deal.

Perhaps not surprisingly, Obama — who called NAFTA “devastating” and “a big mistake” during his campaign against Clinton — softened his criticism once he clinched the Democratic nomination.

PC 8:16PM January 04, 2012

The Perryman Group has been around for 25 years and is well respected in the world.

The Cornell group was formed in 2005 and is it a coincidence that's when the original pipeline was proposed?

PC 11:24AM January 03, 2012

Cornell University is not an independent study.

And misinformation is galling.

Is anyone aware that the XL pipeline extension will incorporate oil from the Bakken fields in North Dakota? A domestic source which will use the pipeline to refine their oil.

Are you ready for this. The Bakken fields will extract oil from the oils sands in the same manner as the oil from Alberta.

Now can we still say dirty crude from Canada in the arguments?

All oil is dirty until refined.

PC 11:02AM January 03, 2012

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

On Energy

Perspectives from all sides of the burning energy issues of the day. Follow it on Twitter @USNewsOnEnergy

advertisement

Economic Intelligence

Return of the Predatory Lending Rip-Off

A pair of industry-backed bills would bring on a sequal to subprime-fueled predatory lending.

Latest Videos

advertisement