• Comment (3)

Fracking Key to the Energy Revolution, If EPA Gets Out of the Way

December 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Thomas Pyle is the president of the Institute for Energy Research

 

Hydraulic fracturing has revolutionized energy production in America. From 1995 to 2008, the U.S. Geological Survey's estimates the amount of recoverable oil in the Bakken formation in North Dakota grew 25 fold. What has made all the difference during this period is the application of hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling to the tight underground shale formations that were previously inaccessible.

But as hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling have caused oil and natural gas production to expand in the United States, the opposition to their use has grown as well. Specifically, the most adamant opposition to hydraulic fracturing has come from anti-energy activists and the Environmental Protection Agency, both of which want to impose stringent regulations or ban fracturing altogether.

[Read the U.S. News Debate: Is Fracking a Good Idea?]

Last week, the Bismarck Tribune reported the Environmental Protection Agency was on track to impose regulations that would severely limit the use of fracking, thereby putting an end to the Bakken shale boom as we know it. This revelation is particularly troubling when one takes into account EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson's recent testimony before Congress in which she admitted, "I'm not aware of any proven case where the fracking process itself has affected water...."

Although EPA responded in an interview with Politico that the agency was only producing "draft guidance" recommendations and not "a regulatory document," the American people have reason to doubt their intentions. In fact, the EPA is currently using the same "guidance" recommendations to halt new surface mining in Appalachia. Given the Obama administration's anti-energy track record—proposing widely expensive ozone regulations, imposing a blanket moratorium on oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico, and reducing the areas available for offshore drilling—one should regard the EPA's assurances with a good deal of well-founded skepticism.

[See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

Hydraulic fracturing has been an economic miracle for our struggling economy and at the same time, it has been impressively safe. The practice has been used in more than one million wells in the last 50 years without, as Administrator Jackson herself admitted, any proven cases of groundwater contamination.

To continue this energy revolution, we must remain vigilant so that the harsh economic realities of our jobs and national debt crisis can be solved in part with the production of affordable and abundant energy resources

Tags:
Lisa Jackson,
natural gas,
energy,
Obama administration,
EPA,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Well written article however the author should have made a reference to the possible link to earthquakes in Oklahoma (not near any faults) and Pennslyvania

Derek of MN 12:37PM December 06, 2011

Fracking is criminally insane because poisons water and thereby poisons large numbers of people. For what? The short-term gain of a few people who don't live near the wells and won't drink that water? We are born with an inalienable right to clean water, and no one has a right to poison our water. Many people whose water has already been contaminated by fracking chemicals now suffer peripheral neuropathy. Who has a right to inflict that on them? No one.

There are better ways to solve the energy crisis than poisoning people.

Anita Beth of CO 6:00PM December 01, 2011

Typical rhetoric from someone who stands to gain from fracking.

The truth is, hydraulic fracturing as it is currently done poses a great danger to the communities where the fracking occurs by contaminating the ground water with the by-products from the fracking process.

Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. and Chesapeake Energy Corp. have both had to pay settlements to residents of Pennsylvania because such contamination.

Furthermore, a study conducted by Theo Colburn of the Endocrine Disruption Exchange in Paonia, Colorado has 65 chemicals used in the fracking process, including benzene, glycol-ethers, toluene, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethanol, and nonylphenols - all of which have been linked to health disorders when human exposure is too high.

Energy independence is something we should strive for, but not at the cost of the health and well-being of citizens.

Jose Colon of NY 12:03PM December 01, 2011

On Energy

Perspectives from all sides of the burning energy issues of the day. Follow it on Twitter @USNewsOnEnergy

advertisement

Economic Intelligence

The Inequality Conundrum

Voters see inequality as a big problem, but they don’t want government to do much about it.

Latest Videos

advertisement