• Comment (5)

Perry: Dismantle the EPA

October 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Texas Governor and Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry is calling for Congress to "dismantle" the Environmental Protection Agency in its current form and open up restricted areas of Alaska, the American West, and the Gulf of Mexico to oil drilling, a move that he claims will create $1.2 million jobs nationwide. The key, and so far only, plank to his economic plan was unveiled Friday morning outside of Pittsburgh.

In Perry's view, environmental regulation should be more of a state function, with the EPA acting more as an advisory agency to help states collaborate. In addition, Perry would strip the EPA of its ability to regulate greenhouse gases and he would also put halt to EPA programs to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. Perry also calls for lifting current restrictions on new oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, put in place by the Obama administration after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and for opening up for drilling long-restricted areas such as the Artic Natural Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Perry calls for boosting natural gas drilling as well, by lifting restrictions on hydraulic or nitrogen fracturing and opening up oil and natural gas development in the western U.S., which Perry said will create 500,000 jobs alone. The job figures, many of them based on industry-backed studies, are likely to get scrutiny from Democrats and environmental groups.

[See cartoons about energy policy.]

Much of Perry's platform has long been supported by Republicans, and many of the other GOP candidates are likely to agree with it. So how can it give him a boost in the primary? Perry has based much of his campaign on his record as a job creator in Texas, where the energy industry still plays a large role in keeping people working. With "Drill, Baby, Drill" still a popular slogan among Republicans, Perry is hoping that he can make the case that as the person who opened up oil fields in Texas, he's the best one to open them up across the country.

Tags:
energy,
EPA,
2012 presidential election,
oil,
environment,
energy policy and climate change,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The EPA actions are too often arbitrary beyond reason, and harmful to our country's economy. Their power is absolute and should be softened considerably, if not dismantled altogether.

amirizar10 of TX 11:50PM April 14, 2012

1. We are currently in an interglacial period. Have been since the end of the Pleistocene Epoch, 11000 years ago. With wide variations of cooling and heating, global temps have generally risen during that period.

2. Global temps began rising, causing the ice sheets to recede, 11000 years before Suv's and the Industrial age.

3. There have been at least two mini-Ice Ages in the last 10,000 years. The last ending in 1855.

4. Sea levels have been rising since the end of the last ice age - with century long pauses during periods of "global cooling. Sea levels have risen nearly 300 feet in the past 15000 years...

5. Currently frozen Greenland uh... used to be "green".

6. Melting ice shelves that everyone is panicking about have melted before - and come back.

7. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that man made co2 has anything to do with possible global warming. Human induced co2 accounts for less than 2% of co2 in the atmosphere. If we followed the green banners and marched back to the caves - leaving 99% of our fellows to die - the Co2 meter would barely move.

8. H2o is (water vapor) is the most common green house gas representing 95% of green house gas.

9. More "bio-mass" is present at the middle latitudes than nearer the poles. Confirm this by trying to grow something on a sheet of ice and compare that to your success in a "green house".

10. Petro-factoids... More oil spilled into the sea every 6 weeks during the nearly 6 years of WWII than in the entire 65 years since its end. Guess what? The oceans survived those 3600+ ships, (hundreds were oil tankers - all were full of fuel oil and chemicals) sinking. When Cabrillo explored the west coast of what is now California, in 1542, he sailed through an oil slick more than a hundred miles wide caused by "natural seepage". Oil platforms actually reduce the amount of oil in the sea by reducing "natural seepage". Less than one barrel per day is lost from all the 3800+ oil platforms each day - more than 1500 barrels seeps into U.S. territorial waters from natural, undersea fissures each day - and would increase if we reduced off shore drilling. The worst man made oil spill in history took place in 1944 when American dive bombers dropped many tons of bombs on 77 Japanese ships in Truk Lagoon. All were sunk. These ships still leak oil to this day. Truck Lagoon is not a "Super Fund Site". Rather, it is the most popular dive resort on the planet and has a diverse underwater ecosystem.

11. 2800 gallons of oil seeps from undersea fissures off Ca. - daily - more than 50 times the amount from production and transport.

12. The DDT ban, was born of Rachel Carson's hysteria - not science. Pseudo science nothwithstanding, DDT was never proven to have any ill effects on humans or the environment. Its ban causes about 1 million deaths per year - mostly women and children.

Finally, anyone may go to, "The Lies of Rachel Carson" or "DDT: A case Study In Scientific Fraud"- for further information.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:57PM December 24, 2011

I will now volunteer for Obama and other reasonable Democrats paying my own way to go campaign in any state that needs my help. Republicans are plain nuts.

Jim of MD 11:28PM December 17, 2011

On Energy

Perspectives from all sides of the burning energy issues of the day. Follow it on Twitter @USNewsOnEnergy

advertisement

Economic Intelligence

Why iTunes Works

Shopping pleasure, conspicuous consumption and creative expression add up to business success.

Latest Videos

advertisement