Fewer Americans See Climate Change a Threat, Caused by Humans

August 26, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (15)

Though climate change hasn't received quite the same attention it had back in 2006 and 2007, it's not too surprising that the vast majority of Americans still know at least something about it. But what they know exactly is changing, and national politics certainly seems to be playing a part.

According to a Gallup poll released Friday, 96 percent of Americans in 2010 said they know a great deal or something about climate change. And while that's down 1 percentage point from 2007 to 2008, it's not a significant change, especially considering how media attention to the issue has dropped off quite significantly since around 2007, when coverage was at its peak. [Read: Do Americans care about climate change anymore?]

However, what Americans who know about climate change think about it has changed quite a bit—namely, they see it as less of a problem—and that change has happened much more rapidly than in the four other top greenhouse gas emitting countries, China, Russia, Japan, and India. In 2010, according to the poll, only 55 percent of Americans believed climate change was a threat to them and their families. That's down 9 percentage points from 64 percent in 2007 and 2008. Also, the percentage of people who believe climate change results all or in part from human causes is down a full 11 percentage points. While 61 percent of Americans in 2007 and 2008 believed that humans were at least partially responsible for climate change, only half believed so in 2010.

In Japan, where a higher percentage of people say they know about climate change, the same decline in threat perception and belief in human causes happened too, though less significantly. In Russia, people's perception of threat went up from 2007 and 2008, but there was no change in the belief in human causes. Then, by contrast, in India, more people in 2010 (an increase of 16 percentage points, from 58 percent to 74 percent) believe that climate change is caused by humans. That same increase happened in China, though it was not as significant. [Read more from the Energy Intelligence blog.]

What's interesting about these results is that climate change has been a predominantly international issue, with the United Nations and its International Panel on Climate Change taking the lead on many initiatives and scientific reports. But, it's clear that rather than listen to the multilateral body—which continues to publicize both the threat and human causes of climate change—people, especially in the United States, are much more tuned in to the politics and the news of their own country.

In America, at least, the strong push from many climate change skeptics, which are now represented by many Republicans in Congress, appear to be making a difference in public views, particularly on the issue of whether humans are the cause. The more conservatives make noise denying the problem of climate change, perhaps, the more people, especially their base, catch on to that view. The decrease in media coverage may also play a role in the public's perception of threat, as climate change has been put on the backburner in favor of energy security and green jobs. [Read about whether global warming will matter in the 2012 elections.]

As Hurricane Irene bears down on the East Coast this weekend, expect a round of commentary from groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council calling attention to the effects of climate change. But, with the trend shifting away from believing in such warnings, it's unlikely that many Americans will even take notice.

Tags:
energy,
global warming,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

becouse evry year our plant got coloser to the sun and very soon we will lose mercory and 34 year later we will lose venas and in 2083 the earth time to go belive it or not

ahmed ibrahim of NY 12:37AM December 15, 2012

As a human living on the planet I see nothing as a retired employee of D.O.D. that I am able to correct. If I were active duty and a member of the Corps of Engineers perhaps I could create for the U.S, anyway, a plan to cut back on waste, pollution ,and other tweaks to clean the air and water within our borders. The solution globally will eventually come from the U.N. and their networking skills with each of its member nations. We live, we die as a species that dreams, imagines and is in a position provided by our creator to fix such problems My Step-Koala would thank all of us humans if we would finally dis-agree by agreeing on a given idea, trying it, changing it to work better, and proceed to improve it instead of talking about the problem (global warming) and taking no action forward to improve our environment. Paying forward is the answer, our successors, in some form will have to bite the bullet and pay back the solution that lets them survive on Heaven-10 power, EARTH.

Charles C. Glasgow III of TX 11:55AM December 08, 2012

When the junk science of global warming was exposed the science community was irresponsible in the fact they didn't scream it from every journal like they did global warming. You don't have to be of any particular party to know bad science. University of Miami's own research shows the Earth has been hotter and colder, yes, in the cycle we are moving toward hotter. We need to have science looking toward crops and other issues hotter climates might cause, instead of repeating and re-labeling bad information. People do need to be careful about the toxins we generate or we may contaminate our food supply. Carbon Offset trading is the best scam to make corporations buy nothing, and will make owners of the Chicago market multi millionaires while you and I pay more for electricity and other items to make the rich richer and it will have no evidence of working. JDLAUGHEAD, science has confirmed higher CO2 levels existed in the past, planet is still here, stop being manipulated by government sponsored science. If oil comes from plants the sequestered CO2 millions of years ago and over time turned into oil, that means we can create more oil in the future by using oil, IT'S A RENEWABLE FUEL SOURCE

Demetri Petrenko of FL 6:28PM October 12, 2012

On Energy

Perspectives from all sides of the burning energy issues of the day. Follow it on Twitter @USNewsOnEnergy

advertisement

Economic Intelligence

Why iTunes Works

Shopping pleasure, conspicuous consumption and creative expression add up to business success.

Latest Videos

advertisement