Reid to Focus on Clean Energy Jobs at Las Vegas Summit

August 10, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Business on Capitol Hill is slow this month, but politicians are still working hard around the country to promote their energy agendas. For Senate Majority Harry Reid the big event comes later this month, on Aug. 30, when he co-hosts the 4th Annual National Clean Energy Summit in his homestate Nevada. [Read more about energy and climate change.]

Green advocates can look no further than Las Vegas for their summer dose of clean energy. Along with the Center for American Progress, the Clean Energy Project, MGM Resorts International, and the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Reid's hoping to show the conference attendees just what the clean energy industry's been up to lately. On a call with reporters Wednesday, Reid gave a preview of what to expect, while digging into his House Republican opponents in Congress.

For one, Reid says governors such as California Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, Washington Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire, and Nevada Republican Gov. Brian Sandoval will be on-hand to talk about clean energy efforts in the West.

Brown, for instance, told reporters about his state's private sector program to build 20,000 megawatts of solar energy by 2020, whether distributed on rooftops or as part of what he says will be the largest central-based solar plant in the world. "We see it as saving energy, creating jobs, reducing pollution and also dealing with climate change," Brown said Wednesday. [See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

U.S. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus will also be at the conference to flout the military's latest green energy initiatives. He says that the U.S. Marine Corps hopes to get half its energy by non-fossil-fuel sources by 2020. "We're saving lives by using alternative energy," he said Wednesday. "We import gasoline more than any single thing into Afghanistan. For every 50 convoys that the Marines escort in, we lose one Marine, either killed or wounded, and that's simply too high a price to pay."

Reid says that once back on the Hill in September, Democrats hope to make energy jobs a signature issue in the coming months. "I would hope that the Republicans will get off their kick of trying to do things that are message pieces of legislation and get to things that are very substantive," Reid said. "These message pieces of legislation that deal with the EPA—they should just forget about it and do things that will create jobs for our country." [Read how Republicans have attacked the EPA.]

But with the Environmental Protection Agency cast by many GOP lawmakers as a job-killing organization, it's doubtful Republicans will let up on their own energy agenda either come September.

Tags:
energy,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Our government hasn't employed best practice fiscal management. Very sad that we have elected people who have never had to create sustainability. We need leaders, not vote soliciters. We need more George Washington and less Harry Reid. Harry Reid is a product of politics, he has never labored to produce for society or the economy. He is a career politician who has spent his life spending other people's money to secure his position, bowing to the audience for votes. Political positions should not be careers, but public service. In the end, Big Government doesn't help people, it degrades them, presuming that the benevolent few will save the whole. Big Government, like dictatorship, is all about preserving the position of those in government, not the security and prosperity of the human soul. A Government created job is the same as just printing more money; it does not strengthen our economy or fiscal strength but rather dilutes it.

Sam Wise of TX 11:38AM August 15, 2011

Look at it this way R.L., world oil production is declining, while demand is increasing. Canada might be sitting on a good oil reserve with their Alberta oil sands, but the US is almost out of oil, even including the paltry amount in Alaska. Whether you care about environmental issues or not does not change the fact that any alternative energy source is going to be worth a lot of money in the near future. Currently, it is cheaper to purchase bio-diesel than it is to buy petroleum diesel. Solar panels, without any type of rebates, now give a return on investment within 2/3 of their useful life. If we became the #1 producing country for any profitable alternative energy source, are you going to tell me that it won't create jobs? What if we produced enough energy to begin exporting our own oil, instead of importing extra from the middle east? We could sell it to China and maybe we'd own 10% of their national debt instead of the other way around. Otherwise, maybe we should forget about all of this nonsense. I suppose you would prefer we invest our money in defense instead. Maybe then we can attack a few middle eastern countries and claim their oil as our own. I'm sure that won't upset anyone.

N.D. Poulin of CA 12:56AM August 11, 2011

is nothing more than an official arm of the Environmentalist Religion and Lisa Jackson is its Wiccan High Priestess.

Going Green Has Gone Absolutely Nuts...

P.S..

Hey Harry - Maybe you could create some jobs with your "Cowboy Poetry Festival".

Has anyone noticed that Progressives have lost their freakin' minds?

R.L. Schaefer of CA 10:54PM August 10, 2011

On Energy

Perspectives from all sides of the burning energy issues of the day. Follow it on Twitter @USNewsOnEnergy

advertisement

Economic Intelligence

How Trade Pacts Threaten Public Health

Far reaching trade pacts make a mockery of the democratic process.

Latest Videos

advertisement