• Comment (12)

If Senate Democrats Won't Pass a Budget, They Shouldn't Be Paid

May 2, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Sunday marked the third year in a row that the Democratic-controlled Senate failed to pass a budget. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has completely abdicated his responsibility to the American people. Make no mistake, Reid has done this with the implicit support of President Obama. Why have the Democrats sat on their hands while our economy suffers and 23 million Americans are looking for jobs? They have done so because it is politically expedient.

Poll after poll shows that the people of this country are concerned about the level of spending and our growing deficit and debt. One would think that this would create a political imperative to tighten our budgetary belt; instead, the Democrats have done the equivalent of taking off the belt and throwing it in the back corner of some dark, dusty closet. They have behaved this irresponsibly because they know that any budget Senate Democrats would pass would provide tremendous fodder for their opponents. So, for political gain, they have chosen obfuscation over responsibility. They spend our money; they just don't admit it.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

As part of its "Bankrupting America" education project, a group called Public Notice released this video on Monday and ran ads this weekend drawing attention to the Senate's inaction. Their message was straightforward: "Stop pointing fingers and start doing your job." It's pretty frightening when we have to start treating our elected officials like recalcitrant teenagers.

The Senate looks particularly bad because the Republican-led House of Representatives has done its job. Under the leadership of Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin and House Speaker John Boehner, the House passed its budget along a party-line vote in March. Whether you loved it or hated it, at least the House Republicans were willing to tell taxpayers how they were planning to spend our money.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Will the New Ryan Budget Plan Hurt the GOP in 2012?]

At least one member of the Senate has had enough. Sen. Dean Heller—Reid's Republican fellow Nevadan—has introduced legislation called the "No Budget, No Pay Act" (S.1981). In this legislation he brilliantly links lawmaker compensation to passing a concurrent budget resolution and related appropriations bills. If they miss their deadline, no pay is rewarded retroactively. Last Sunday, Heller issued this statement:

The time to pass a budget is now. Our debt has increased by more than $5 trillion under this Administration in the past three years. Members of Congress are willfully refusing to put our nation on a path to long-term fiscal responsibility, which threatens our economic security and places a greater burden on our children and grandchildren. Passing a budget every year is one of Congress' most basic responsibilities, yet the Senate has been completely incapable of performing this function. I introduced the No Budget, No Pay Act to force Congress to take this responsibility seriously. If Members of Congress are not doing their job, then they should not get paid.

I have never met the man, but I am now his biggest fan.

Tags:
Paul Ryan,
Dean Heller,
John Boehner,
deficit and national debt,
federal budget,
Harry Reid,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

BILL HEDGES of MO

You debunked nothing.

Marla of NY 9:19AM September 24, 2012

brucetee

You claimed “No matter how you slice it.the republicans have been an abysmal failure”. So I point UNTRUE, WE WON big Nov. 2, 2010.

Now you say “Voters can see the gross incompetence of the republicans since taking over the house of representatives in 2010.” So you can ignore HOUSE passed LOTS of bills and Senate can not even pass budget in three year. Democrats controlled most of the three years. Senate doing THEIR JOB can vote on the bills or re-write and send back to HOUSE. That’s how it works.

But NO. Proven “incompetence” is establish with DEMOCRATS... CUT OFF their UNEARNED PAY.

YOU are not being paid for your remarks here are YOU ?:

In “Ted Nugent, Hilary Rosen Sheltering Obama from Scrutiny” you wrote “In fact average workers during that period,lost ground, due to stagnant wage increases,and reduced purchasing power". Did not find proof of that in your two links. Prehaps you can quote as I do... For sure, your earlier quote “the economic growth,of which he speakes, benefited, by a wide margin,those on the upper rungs of the income ladder. very little ,if any, trickled down to the folks on main st” __ is NOT substantiated __ ... What he spoke has nothing to do with your two articles...

In the first link it says “Experts point to some of the usual suspects -- like technology and globalization -- to explain the widening gap between the haves and have-nots”

Also says “One major pull on the working man was the decline of unions and other labor protections, said Bill Rodgers, a former chief economist for the Labor Department, now a professor at Rutgers University”

Also says “International competition is another factor. While globalization has lifted millions out of poverty in developing nations, it hasn't exactly been a win for middle class workers in the U.S.”

Also says “While average folks were losing ground in the economy, the wealthiest were capitalizing on some of those same factors, and driving an even bigger wedge between themselves and the rest of America”

http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/16/news/economy/middle_class/index.htm

YOUR SECOND ARTICLE SAID ___ Second says “The latest census data depict a middle class that's shrinking as unemployment stays high and the government's safety net frays. The new numbers follow years of stagnating wages for the middle class that have hurt millions of workers and families

http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/16/1713834/census-1-in-2-americans-are-poor.html#storylink=cpy”

YOU WROTE __ Don’t see how this, as you wrote, “In fact average workers during that period,lost ground, due to stagnant wage increases,and reduced purchasing power" MATCH UP as proof.

Bill Hedges of MO 2:48PM May 03, 2012

The unnamed is still residing in the past.Voters can see the gross incompetence of the republicans since taking over the house of representatives in 2010.

little wonder the repubs are running scared.

bruce b of NV 11:30AM May 03, 2012

Nancy Pfotenhauer

Nancy Pfotenhauer

Nancy Pfotenhauer is president of MediaSpeak Strategies, a national communications firm. Nancy was a senior policy adviser and spokesperson with the McCain for President campaign. She has served as president of the Independent Women’s Forum, director of the Washington office of Koch Industries, a cabinet level adviser, economic counsel to Sen. William Armstrong, chief economist for the Republican National Committee, and she served on President George H. W. Bush’s transition team in 1988. You can follow her on Twitter at @npfotenhauer.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement