Hillary Clinton Supporters: Are You Happy Now?

August 15, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (198)

So she's in. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama announced that Clinton's name will indeed be on the nomination ballot at the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Obama supports this for the sake of unity, saying he hopes it will help bring the party together. This is historic, but will it do anything to satisfy Clinton's supporters?

Clinton joins Margaret Chase Smith, whose name was considered for the Republican nomination in 1964, and Shirley Chisholm, who won 151.5 votes at the Democratic convention in 1972. The National Organization for Women and other groups across the country are touting her accomplishment. "Hillary Clinton's campaign made history this year, with 18 million women and men across the country voting for her in the primaries," NOW President Kim Gandy said in a statement. "And she will make history yet again when delegates from nearly every state in the nation will be able to take the floor and proudly say Clinton's name in the roll call vote."

These groups are right: Clinton is making history. But she is still supporting Obama. Her latest statements show no indication that she expects to win the nomination or join the fight against the "flawed" primary process that groups like PUMA (Party Unity My A—) and The Denver Group are making noise about. When delegates take to the floor and get to vote for Clinton, the woman who got closer to winning the presidency than any woman in history, it will be historic. But for advocates of women in politics, like me, the true example of success is when delegates can vote for a woman who has a chance of winning the nomination. That will be the point in history when we can truly say we've come far enough. Right now, there is still a lot of work to do for women in politics. Allowing delegates to vote for Clinton at the convention isn't the end of the fight for women or, likely, for PUMA supporters.

So my question to all of you Hillraisers is: Are you happy now?

Tags:
Democratic National Convention,
2008 presidential election,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (198)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hi. Health consists of having the same diseases as one's neighbors.

I am from Belarus and too bad know English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "An rika izumi fansite that has photo profile stopping synthroid medication."

With love :(, Alston.

Alston of PA 9:19PM May 21, 2009

Well, let’s see. The media and Obama supporters were ruthless and attacked Hillary and her husband in a Republican fashion. Then Obama snubbed Hillary and did not even consider her for VP thinking he’s invincible and he does not need Hillary and her 18 million supporters. He also thought the national election will be a cake walk. Now he’s getting a taste of his own medicine and a big doze of Republican dirty tricks and it looks like he does not stand a Palin of a chance.

Thank you Obama and Obama supporters for handing yet another election to the Republicans on a silver platter.

Sam of OH 3:07PM September 10, 2008

Question...now that McCain has chosen a woman VP you hear nothing but how she is inexperienced. However, she has more executive experience than anyone in both parties. If she has more experience than Obama, then why is she criticized more than him. We can talk how much our country has moved on, ...but sexism is still a factor. Whether it's Hillary or Palin, a woman still has to work twice as hard to get half the recognition of a man!!!

of NY 12:40AM August 30, 2008

Morgan Felchner

Morgan Felchner

Morgan E. Felchner is a managing editor at U.S. News & World Report. She is the editor of Voting in America.

advertisement

advertisement