No Presidential Dynasties, Please

December 7, 2007 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Listening recently to former Presidents Bush and Clinton leads me to this conclusion: The nation needs a respite from the Bush-Clinton presidencies.

In Clinton's case, the former president is logically out stumping earnestly for his wife in the early caucus and primary states. However, he has already stumbled badly in an appearance in Iowa.

The former president talked about himself far more than his candidate and claimed he had opposed from the start the war in Iraq. Of course, he hadn't. There were TV clips to prove it.

For those talking up Sen. Hillary Clinton as a third term for the Clintons, there are counterpoints

First, there is the promise of a virulent campaign against her if she wins the nomination. Polls show about half the country already giving her negative marks; Republicans can be counted on to stress those marks.

If she wins the presidency, what to do with a gregarious two-term former president? Assigning him the role of traveling goodwill ambassador has been suggested. But can he avoid delving into important foreign policy matters and even straying off the reservation?

As for Bush 41, after his nearly pathetic defense of Bush 43 in recent interviews, it should please voters that Jeb Bush is not running to be Bush 44.

The former two-term governor of Florida, the best politician in the Bush family, is on the sidelines now. He could be talked into making a run in 2012.

Then there is Jeb's son, George P. Bush. He's a smart, good-looking young man who is interested in politics. Why not groom him to run in the distant future?

The nation has had the Adamses, the Harrisons, and the Roosevelts in the White House. We've already had 12 years of the Bush family, with the son's eight probably ranking him as the worst or near worst president in history.

Despite his humiliating impeachment for which he was entirely to blame, Bill Clinton's eight years were relatively successful. Still, they were filled with controversy for him and the then first lady. Now she is leading the pack in the Democratic race.

The prospect of a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton era conjures up a troubling word: dynasty.

Tags:
George W. Bush,
Bill Clinton,
Hillary Clinton,
George H.W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I totally agree that ex president Bill Clinton,remains the greatest American president in the last century next to Franklyn Delano Roosevelt.Clinton is endowed with so much charms and charisma that even if your hate him you can not help it but to love him for his person.he remains the greatest American that we are opportuned to know in our lifetime.

ignatius ikechukwu patrick 5:04AM April 21, 2010

Apparently, spam is defined as comments made by your readers, that do not comport with the prejudices of USNews & World Report. In my previous post, which you rejected for publication on your "comments" page, I described Mashek in the only way I felt was honest and straightforward. His comments against Clinton, were violently partisan and vicious in their condemnation of Presidnt Clinton. Though, he was careful to thinly veil his hatred for our former president behind that verbal hypocrisy so respected by what passes for our Press.

john polifronio of CA 12:10AM March 10, 2010

One thing is certain, you surely are a republican, right-wing imbecile.

john polifronio of CA 12:01AM March 10, 2010

A Capital View

A Capital View

John W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement

advertisement