Guns Kill People. Period.

April 18, 2007 RSS Feed Print

This writing is not going to earn me any Christmas card from the zealots at the National Rifle Association or best wishes from the unyielding adherents to the Second Amendment.

Guns kill people. Period.

The tragedy at Virginia Tech should open our minds to a problem our nation refuses to confront. The easy access to guns and lethal weapons is a national disgrace.

In Virginia alone, gun owners are limited to one purchase a month. Some limitation.

I can hear the response from the NRA already: People kill people. Yes, but they do it with guns and too frequently with those easily accessible weapons.

The condolences from the NRA are of little comfort to the mourners of those slaughtered in Blacksburg.

The NRA, to put it bluntly, has too many willing friends in Congress from both political parties. Campaign cash flows to them in hefty amounts. Members of both parties should be ashamed.

The Second Amendment, a biblical passage to its followers, may give a right to bear arms. It does not, however, give a license to kill. Try telling it to the NRA.

I was raised in South Dakota, where hunting pheasants and ducks is a tradition. In those less chaotic days, no one had ever heard of Saturday night specials on the quiet streets of Sioux Falls or in the hunting fields for that matter.

Hunting is perfectly legal. There are accidents. Ask Vice President Cheney.

But the NRA and its PR machine cry foul at any attempt to restrict access to guns. It is not a sport to hunt wild game with an Uzi or other semiautomatic weapons.

We need to tighten existing laws or limit the frequent purchases like those of the disturbed student at Virginia Tech who had no trouble arming himself to the hilt.

A few weeks ago, the House of Representatives shelved a voting rights bill for the District of Columbia. The action came after a Texas Republican offered an amendment to repeal the D.C. ban on guns.

In time, the rampage at VT will be off the front pages and evening newscasts.

What is it going to take for us to finally wake up?

Reader Comments Read all comments (38)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

nope

Nope of NY 7:25PM April 25, 2012

Why is it that despite the overwhelming evidence that giving guns to civilians is a remarkably bad idea, why is it that some people still support it? Well 3 reasons.

1 - Gun lobby: If you are a gun retailer you want people to buy guns. The more people buy guns the more money you make. The bulk of the support comes from merchants of death who couldn't care less about what happens to gun owners.

2- Paranoia: Some people are paranoid. It's a common personality threat. A lot of people are just scared and paranoid. They are scared of their own shadow. Guns give them a false sense of security and empowerment. That's the selling argument of the NRA: Protect yourself! But from what? Unless you live in Baghdad or Mogadishu you really shouldn't need a gun to feel safe. If you feel you need a gun to get out of your house without being scare, you need to move, or you need to go see a psychiatrist.

3- Non sense: modern societies are based on the government control of violence. The very equilibrium of the world is based on a simple premise: A. Big guns are controlled by the Army to protect citizens against outside threats (neighboring countries). B. Small guns are controlled by the police to protect citizens from domestic threats (you neighbor trying to rob you). These two things insure social stability. When civilians get guns what you get is Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, meaning a very bad, very unstable society where no one is safe. One of United Nation main mission is to implement government control of the guns in the world to stabilize those countries.

This has been proven again and again and again, But hey the merchants of death will always convince the paranoid of the non sense.

Patrick of FL 12:11PM April 17, 2012

Nobody who voted on or signed the constitution ever owned a that could be fired twice without reloading it (muzzle load).

Dave M of MI 10:49AM February 28, 2012

A Capital View

John MashekJohn W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992.

advertisement