• Comment (26)

Hilary Rosen Remarks Give Mitt Romney an Opportunity with Women

April 13, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Thursday the president, the vice president, the first lady, and the senior leadership of the Obama campaign all lowered the boom on Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen, after she criticized Anne Romney for not having worked "a day in her life" and yet offering her husband advice on women's economic concerns. The fact that senior Democrats reacted so quickly shows how volatile they know the women's vote is. I'd be willing to bet that after this week's events, Mitt Romney's 19-point gender gap with women has narrowed.

Democratic leaders reacted so quickly because they know that these days, no one should be criticizing the choices women make about raising their kids. Like many women, I've tried all kinds of ways to make it work: I've worked in an office full time, I've been home full time with the kids, I've worked part time from an office in my house. For some families—one of my sisters, for example—it works better for everyone if the dad stays home. Women have found all kinds of ways to make it work. 

[See Mary Kate Cary's Five Ways the GOP Can Woo Women.]

Two weeks ago, Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe said that the contraception issue was a "retro" debate. This seems even more retro to me, a fight that ended when bell bottoms and tie dye went out of style. Times have changed, and to criticize anyone's choices in terms of work-life balance, as Hilary Rosen did, comes across as intolerant, disrespectful, and divisive.

But it does present a terrific opportunity for former Gov. Mitt Romney to talk about creating the kind of economic growth that allows all women to be able to afford the same choices that both Hilary Rosen and Anne Romney have had—both mothers, by the way, who made different choices. There are plenty of women who would love to stay home with their children, but can't afford to go without the paycheck. And there are plenty of women who would love to take a full-time job but can't afford quality child care—the cost of which would make the paycheck a wash. If Romney can talk about creating the kind of "opportunity economy" that allows all women be able to afford to make the best choices for their family, he'd be in fine shape.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Romney also needs to talk about how to get the millions of women who have lost their jobs during this recession back into the workforce as quickly as possible. He can also highlight the fact that millions of small business owners are women—so many of the women I know who stay at home have small businesses on the side, either as consultants, brokers, or even retailers. Proposing to cut the red tape and taxes that are holding back small business owners—and by extension, many women—would be a winner for Romney. Most importantly, he should emphasize that he supports equal pay for women. Most of us believe "a rising tide lifts all boats"—and Mitt Romney should say that women's boats deserve to be as least as big as the men's boats.

Tags:
Ann Romney,
economy,
2012 presidential election,
female voters,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mary, please stop talking about women as though we are a side note, an afterthought, or something to be apologized for! I expect that out of men but coming from another woman is...disturbing. Are you trying not to offend the men or discourage the women? You seem to be informing men about the plight of women, so they'll understand that these issues are real.

I mean you make a lot of good points and sound very sincere, but the tone is, bear with me, Like a woman who works or deals with a lot of businessmen all the time and has to act non-threatening, meek, subordinate, apologetic, self-depreciating and invisible; so as not to offend or agitate the men she has to deal with. Like a secretary with a mean boss. (male or female)

It's your last line that speaks volumes: "Women's boats deserve to be at least as big as men's boats"

Is this because you know They won't give women boats equal to theirs? Or because you know They already consider women as second class and giving us anything is a favor?

The world already knows that there are more women in power that are Democrats and that there are fewer republican women in office than ever. Not that there were ever that many in the first place.

Fix that first then come looking for more women to join you.

The Republican's record with women is dismal, their record on women's issue is worse. It's not just Mitt, it's the whole fricken party!

marre of GA 1:37PM May 05, 2012

Talk is cheap and we already know that republicans will promise women anything and give us Arpege`. Not buying that crap today, tomorrow and next week doesn't look too good either.

Now maybe if his wife were running she'd have shot at getting a few votes, but she's not. At least she appears honest and not like a sleazy used car salesman!

The only way Mitt can win this election is if...uhhh, sorry, there is NOTHING he can do to win but cheat. Worked for bush.

Wonder which tricks he'll be using this time around?

marre of GA 1:10PM May 05, 2012

Let's see? Sydney of Calif., Are you in poverty? No? How can you relate? Are you rich? No? How can you relate? I know you'all see what's happening. Class warfare, gender warfare, poverty warfare, health care warfare.

All families go through the same set of problems as they grow. Whether rich or poor in their own way. If your claim is that they, (pick a side), aren't suffering enough according to your definition of pain, so? Do you want them to be in the same predicament you are in? Why? They should suffer your pain because you do? I bet you have a better car than I do. I bet you probably have a better house than I do, too. Does that make me want you to move into my house so we are living the same way? Will it make me FEEL better to see you humbled?

Not everyone works two jobs. Not everyone has two children. Not everyone is blue eyed and blond. Get it?? Some have what they have because hey worked for it. Some have it because their Parents sacrificed so their children could have what they didn't. Some people have the CAPACITY to do more than others. Should they be harnessed and held back? Do you want someone to run this country if he does not have the education or the capacity to? (no pun intended).

Although politicians only bring out the bottom line of any commotion to better confuse the people, such as, " The waitress working in a roadside diner who has two children with no child care", of which the numbers are few in comparison,(OH! Please), brought out as the biggest tragedy? While a tragedy it may be, there are a FEW really should be worried about.

Contraception, is as much of a problem as flouride in water. Would it not have been better for "0" to say, "I have decided that the life saving drug INSULIN will be free to all diabetics of which our country has aproxomatelly 48 million of which 18 million are children. The insurance companies will not be allowed to charge for this medicine. " Which of you would have objected to that? Instead he brings out the idea that even CHILDREN can screw their brains out without worry of pregnancy. Then presents it as some big huge problem that women face! Good for votes? Maybe. Contraversial? Obviously. Stupid? Most definitely!

Mytwocents of WA 4:02PM April 16, 2012

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement