• Comment (16)

The Republican Party Must Win Back Women Voters

March 12, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The GOP is hemorrhaging the women's vote: a New York Times/CBS poll taken in mid-February showed that women now approve of the job President Obama is doing by a margin of 53 to 38 percent; in January, it was 48 to 46 percent. A Wall Street Journal/ NBC News poll this month shows that the president has opened an 18 point lead among women over former Gov. Mitt Romney. Unless the Republican leadership steps forward to turn things around quickly, it's going to get a whole lot worse. By "quickly," I mean now. This week.

That's because the New York Times reported on Sunday that starting Monday, the Obama campaign is launching an "intensified effort" to win women back, after narrowly losing the women's vote in the 2010 midterms. Monday, mailings go out to a million women in a dozen battleground states, targeted at mothers, young women, and older women. On Wednesday, "Nurses for Obama" will launch, with a nationwide network of healthcare reform "advocates," a new website, and phone banks in swing states to contact women. By the end of the month we'll see a "Women's Week of Action" timed to follow the long-planned hoopla set for the second anniversary of the president signing the healthcare bill into law. Volunteers told the New York Times about launching "Women for Obama" groups on Facebook pages and with house parties, and that all kinds of women are joining enthusiastically.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Catholic contraception controversy.]

"Up until six weeks ago, Democrats suffered from an intensity gap, but this has closed as women—particularly suburban women—have turned against the G.O.P.," pollster Peter Hart, told the Times.

In the same issue of the Sunday New York Times this weekend, this story ran: "Centrist Women Tell of Disenchantment with Republicans." Here's a quote from Mary Russell, a self-described "old school" Republican who is a retired teacher from Iowa City, who had spoken with her girlfriends: "We all agreed that this seemed like a throwback to 40 years ago." That is exactly the sentiment I was hearing all weekend from women here in Washington. The Republican women I spoke with are up in arms. As for the Republican presidential candidates, Mary Russell added: "If they're going to decide on women's reproductive issues, I'm not going to vote for any of them. Women's reproduction is our own business." Amen to that. I'm an "old school" Republican too, and I'm a big fan of the Mind Your Own Business argument.

There are two things the leadership of the Republican Party must do—whether that means candidates Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul, Speaker of the House John Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican Governors Chair Bob McDonnell, or Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus—have you noticed there are no women on that list? (Maybe that's part of the problem.)

[Read the U.S. News debate: Will the Culture Wars Benefit the GOP in the 2012 Election?]

First, it's not too late for them to unequivocally state that Rush Limbaugh's recent statements calling Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute" were wrong. Not inappropriate, not a poor choice of words, but wrong. And that sentiments like that have no place in the modern Republican Party.

Second, they can't ignore this problem and hope that it will pass in time for the general election. Originally I wrote that these social issues were a distraction and that we should get the conversation back to an economic one. But that was before the list got so long: the Susan G. Komen fight with Planned Parenthood; the Health and Human Services ruling on free access to the morning-after pill and contraception, and the congressional hearing on it without any women; the fight in the Virginia legislature over mandatory ultrasounds; Rush Limbaugh's rantings; and Rick Santorum questioning pre-natal testing and writing that "radical feminists" were the cause of women working outside the home. The genie is out of the bottle, and Republicans aren't going to force it back in by being silent. Women make up the majority of American voters, and the majority is upset.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Rick Santorum.]

Women need to be reassured that the Republican Party does not believe in dictating women's reproductive choices for them. If the GOP is truly the party of free markets and free people, it needs to echo the wisdom of Mary Russell: "Women's reproduction is our own business." If the modern Republican Party wants to be the home of limited government conservatism—which I'm not convinced it does anymore—it needs to prove that its small government philosophy extends to all things, including social issues. The GOP can't argue that it's against government mandates in healthcare in some cases, and not in others.

Time to make a good case for why women should vote Republican. Right now, it's getting difficult for us "old school" Republicans to keep defending the men.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Republican Party,
2012 presidential election,
women's health,
female voters

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As long as the Republicans confined themselves to being simply "Pro-Life," they could maintain their own party's women voters and perhaps some of the independent women. But now that they have shoved through vaginal ultrasounds in many states and are vehemently attempting to prevent ALL women from having access to contraceptives, they have driven a stake through their own hearts and short of completely reversing themselves, which would prove to be obvious politics at work, they have all Democrat women, most Independent women and some Republican women against them. It's too late now.

Deborah Dean of TX 1:05PM April 12, 2012

I was a GOP supporter from 1968 through 1988, a volunteer in both Reagan campaigns. How any woman, with any vestige of self-respect, could continue to vote "R" is totally beyond me. There may indeed be some right-leaning opinions that women can agree with; there are some I still agree with myself.

But the contempt, the patronizing condescension and the non-stop disparagement of women and their concerns completely outweigh those issues. When the GOP turned into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Southern Baptist Convention is when I fled. I'm merely amazed that other women are just now waking up to the threats to their hard-won rights.

Mandy Cat of FL 3:10PM March 25, 2012

Repub from FL,

I'll keep it to one issue.

YOU have lost YOUR collective mind". You are a Republican, but you are sucking up liberal bile about our Constitution and parroting it.

You used the typical, liberal-distorted church/state error. Please free yourself of liberal talking points and arguments.

The 'separation of church and state' is a liberal semi-paraphrase of a sliver of Thomas Jefferson's private letter to the Danbury Baptists IN REPLY TO the Baptist's letter to him.

The Baptist's letter was 'Do you believe in the GOV'T INTERFERING in the affairs OF THE CHURCHES?' He answered - NO.

That is OPPOSITE of the Left, who made it a decades-long propaganda blitz substituting the First Amendment for their agenda being poured into the sliver of Jefferson's letter, semi-paraphrased. They turn it into the EXACT OPPOSITE of what it means.

The ObamaCare/ACA HHS mandate is a FIRST AMENDMENT issue. It's irrelevant on what issue it's being applied to.

~ First Amendment:

# "CONGRESS"

# "SHALL MAKE NO LAW"

# "RESPECTING THE *ESTABLISHMENT* OF RELIGION"

# "OR *PROHIBITING* THE *FREE* EXERCISE THEREOF;"

James Madison maintained:

1785: "Because if Religion be EXEMPT from the authority of the Society at large, STILL LESS can it be subject to that of the *Legislative Body*."

- James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments-Point #2, June 20, 1785. Papers 8:198-304

1789: "The civil rights of NONE shall be abridged ON ACCOUNT OF religious belief or worship, nor shall any NATIONAL *RELIGION* be ESTABLISHED".

- James Madison's 1st draft, the religion clause. June 8, 1789

Founding father, Patrick Henry did say:

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."

So, a good close paraphrase is: "Congress, a Legislative Body, shall pass no laws establishing a state religion, nor shall Congress prohibit the FREE exercise of religion."

So, a religious institution and person should not be forced to pay for, or provide for, contraception, whatever it is, if it violates their faith.

BTW, Fluke & Co can get $9 contraception from Walmart or buy female and male condoms.

Just sayin....

The real issue is the actual First Amendment.

Spinning that issue doesn't change the legal reality from "the Supreme Law of the Land".

Obama Inc wants to skip this amendment.

Then again, Obama DOES take a 'living document' view, so his agenda stuffed into the Constitution serves his agenda.

HarryFromMA of MA 9:31PM March 20, 2012

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement