• Comment (36)

Jobs Come From Innovative Ideas

September 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print

So an elephant and a giraffe are at the watering hole and they see a turtle basking in the sun. The elephant walks over and kicks the turtle as hard as he can. "What'd you do that for?" asks the surprised giraffe. The elephant says, "That turtle bit my trunk 50 years ago."  "Wow!" says the giraffe, "You have a great memory."  "Yes," says the elephant, "I have ... Turtle Recall."

As any good joke writer knows (and please, I'm not saying that was a good joke), humor is the result of combining two incongruent ideas. In this case, it's the idea of talking jungle animals making references to an Arnold Schwarzenegger action movie. The same thing is true in business today: innovative ideas come from combining concepts from different fields. And those kinds of transformative, game-changing innovations are what power the kind of high-growth start-ups that create jobs in our economy. In fact, over the last 25 years, high growth companies have created all net new jobs. [Slideshow: The 10 Best Cities to Find a Job]

In their new book, The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators, Jeff Dyer, Hal Gregersen and Clayton Christensen interview 5,000 entrepreneurs worldwide and discover that "disruptive innovators" have five personality traits in common. First, they are relentlessly curious individuals who ask a lot of questions; they are more observant than most; they enjoy experimenting and trying new things; and they network with others not to find their next job, but to learn about the next new idea. Most of all, they are "associative"—meaning they have an ability to take ideas from past experiences, previous work or other industries and create new mash-ups. An example would be the scientist at 3M who, rather than throwing out a weak glue that wouldn't stick to anything but paper, decided to put it on the back of notepads and invented the Post-It note. (By the way, Post-It notes are now at $1 billion in annual sales globally.)

The authors found that overarching these five skills—which, they point out, can be learned and practiced by just about everyone— is one key ingredient. Disruptive innovators have courage. Almost anyone can think of a new idea for making a good product or service even better. But it takes guts to start a business, and it takes guts to hire people. [Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on the economy.]

With Friday's abysmal jobs numbers—the United States added no new jobs at all in August—the American people need a shot of courage. If we can create a culture that allows more people to successfully open new businesses and create high-growth start-ups—and put policies in place that will help them succeed in the long run—that courage will become contagious. More than half of Fortune 500 companies were founded during a recession or a bull market, according to a recent study by the Kauffman Foundation. It can be done. Let's hear more from our leaders in Washington about Americans' can-do spirit in tough times, and less fighting about whose fault this all is. People are hungry for some positive leadership, and we're not getting it. While that's an innovative idea that came from an existing company, there are plenty more that come from high growth start-ups.

Tags:
employment,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (36)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Many people are buzzing about an article at truthout.org by one Mike Lofgren, a longtime Republican staff aide on Capitol Hill who just couldn’t take the crazy anymore, left his job, and produced this buzzy (and quite well-written) lamentation about his party’s tactics and goals. If you haven’t read it, you must

The Lofgren piece is full of harsh observations and accusations, but here’s just a little sampling:

• The debt-ceiling debate was an act of “political terrorism,” in which the GOP concocted a crisis and used it to ensure that the party's unprecedented demands were met. He writes: “Everyone knows that in a hostage situation, the reckless and amoral actor has the negotiating upper hand over the cautious and responsible actor because the latter is actually concerned about the life of the hostage, while the former does not care.”

• The August FAA reauthorization fight was another instance such of hostage-taking: “Republicans were willing to lay off 4,000 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employees, 70,000 private construction workers, and let FAA safety inspectors work without pay, in fact, forcing them to pay for their own work-related travel—how prudent is that?—in order to strong arm some union-busting provisions into the FAA reauthorization.”

• The GOP plan to discredit government in the people’s eyes is very conscious: “A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress's generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner.”

• As for belief as opposed to tactics, the party basically really cares only about the rich. Actually, Lofgren doesn’t say “basically.” He says “solely and exclusively.” And he explains how they’ve camouflaged this with talk of protecting small businesses and so on.

There is much, much more. He’s not very happy either about his party’s militarism, its cynical use of religion, its total opposition to doing anything about the environment, and other matters, but most

programs so they will be there in the future."

Eggman of CO 6:41PM September 06, 2011

This is sounds strange coming from a conservative. So far the house has shown no new ideas . Their eforts and focus have been merely to strangulate, to stifle, and to squash. Their goal seems to ennervate, not to innovate. They have worked hard to subvert and sabotage our government. To treat the President with disrespect. To dismantle environmental and consumer laws. They squabble . Instead of trying to improve the economy they harass the President, just like they harassed Clinton for 8 years. It would be truly innovative if the House were to try to help not hinder. To support not subvert. Or, how about if the house were to just do their job and not demagog.At any rate they are not going to innovate. They will keep on harassing Obama just like they harassed Clinton. A wing nut always does the same thing over and over. That's why they call themselves conservatives, as if it were something to be proud of. I think a smart man said once "to do the same thing over and over and expect different results is insane".

Temblor of CO 1:56AM September 06, 2011

This is sounds strange coming from a conservative. So far the house has shown no new ideas . Their eforts and focus have been merely to strangulate, to stifle, and to squash. Their goal seems to ennervate, not to innovate. They have worked hard to subvert and sabotage our government. To treat the President with disrespect. To dismantle environmental and consumer laws. They squabble . Instead of trying to improve the economy they harass the President, just like they harassed Clinton for 8 years. It would be truly innovative if the House were to try to help not hinder. To support not subvert. Or, how about if the house were to just do their job and not demagog.At any rate they are not going to innovate. They will keep on harassing Obama just like they harassed Clinton. A wing nut always does the same thing over and over. That's why they call themselves conservatives, as if it were something to be proud of. I think a smart man said once "to do the same thing over and over and expect different results is insane".

This is sounds strange coming from a conservative. So far the house has shown no new ideas . Their eforts and focus have been merely to strangulate, to stifle, and to squash. Their goal seems to ennervate, not to innovate. They have worked hard to subvert and sabotage our government. To treat the President with disrespect. To dismantle environmental and consumer laws. They squabble . Instead of trying to improve the economy they harass the President, just like they harassed Clinton for 8 years. It would be truly innovative if the House were to try to help not hinder. To support not subvert. Or, how about if the house were to just do their job and not demagog.At any rate they are not going to innovate. They will keep on harassing Obama just like they harassed Clinton. A wing nut always does the same thing over and over. That's why they call themselves conservatives, as if it were something to be proud of. I think a smart man said once "to do the same thing over and over and expect different results is insane.

Temblor of CA 1:47AM September 06, 2011

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement