Democrats Spinning New York Special Election Results

May 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (52)

The New York Times’ Gail Collins calls it the “Democratic Happy Dance”—that breathless, gleeful coverage of the Democrats’ win in the special election held this week in New York’s 26th Congressional District. Charlie Cooks suggests that perhaps some decaf would be in order, and I couldn’t agree more. The left is trying to portray the win as a repudiation of the Ryan Medicare plan that puts Democrats back in the speaker’s chair by 2012, but let’s take a look at what the mainstream media is not reporting:

First, here are the actual results: Democratic candidate Kathy Hochul won with 47 percent of the vote, GOP candidate Jane Corwin got 43 percent, and “Tea Party” candidate Jack Davis came in with 9 percent. Clearly, Davis’s attacks on Hochul split the Republican vote, which would have been 52 percent if you add Davis and Corwin’s together. This is less than other statewide Republican candidates have won recently, but it would have been enough to defeat Hochul, and it would have been a majority of voters, which, let’s remember, Hochul did not garner. Why the media didn’t pick up this narrative—that the much-feared Tea Party is drawing votes away from GOP candidates—is a surprise to me. Instead, they’ve all jumped on the Medicare bandwagon instead.

[Read: New York Special Election Medicare Fight Enters Spin Mode.]

Michael Barone blames the New York GOP establishment for continuing to pick losing candidates in the last three special elections:

Under New York law, candidates in special elections are nominated by county party leaders, and in all three recent New York special elections the party leaders chose a member of the New York Assembly. All three lost. Polls show that New York voters have a particularly low regard for their state legislature ... Assembly Republicans are a particularly forlorn group, since they are hugely outnumbered (100-48 after the 2010 election). There must be some smart Assembly Republicans, but serving in a heavily outnumbered party in a chamber dominated by one individual during sessions that place take in Albany in the winter—well, let’s just say it doesn’t sound like the most attractive job for a politically talented individual. Memo to New York Republican county leaders: next time you have a special election, nominate someone who is not a member of the Assembly.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Tea Party.]

So, Jane Corwin was not the best candidate for the job, and my sense is that an earlier defense of the Ryan plan would have turned the vote around. Instead, she sat on her hands and didn’t respond to Hochul’s attacks until the final weeks of the campaign. There’s no need for Republicans to drop the Ryan plan—I still believe that voters will reward political courage in the long run—but they could have done a better job helping Corwin sell the plan to voters. Republicans need to point out that the Democrats’ plan is to simply do nothing and allow the status quo to take Medicare into bankruptcy. There’s no need to demagogue when the truth is on your side.

Tags:
Tea Party,
Republican Party,
Democratic Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (52)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It was Bush's fault that the democrat lost the NY congressional seat they held forever.

ngcfla of FL 7:55AM September 14, 2011

"Get used to this trend - to vote out Republicans - as long as the Republicans won't tax the wealthy, who are enjoying lowest tax rates in 80 yrs and continue to give away corporate welfare to oil companies."

Yes Democrats say less revenue for government with lowe tax rates for wealthy. Did you ever see the proof of the $$$ they suggest ? Oh they will say if you reduce tax rate "x" you lose "C" $$$. But that is not how it works.

Let JFK quote explain:

"Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits… In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now."

_____

Bush tax cuts for rich increased government revenue, just like JFK said:

" According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

_____

Lisa, as far as "corporate welfare to oil companies." Senator barry was in the thick of it and helped him get elected president:

But you complain didn't you. Well look what Clinton and obamaoil did to us...

“The 1995 Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (DWRRA - courtesy of Bill Clinton) exempted royalties on defined amounts of deep water production. After its 2000 expiration, the law was redefined and extended to promote further deep water drilling. ”

_____

Senator barry’s involvement:

... "the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) reporting that its employees and political action committees gave more to him (obama) than to any other federal candidate in the past 20 years.”

“During his 2008 campaign, CRP reported that the oil and gas industry overall gave him $884,000, more than any to other lawmaker except John McCain, and no wonder. His Senate voting record showed what they bought:"

“the right of mining companies to strip mine everywhere, including on government lands;

vast new powers and handouts to the nuclear industry;

harmful biofuels production;

lax regulation; and

other pro-business, anti-populist measures - besides supporting the 2005 Energy Policy Act."

Don’t forget barry’s waver to worst polluter in Gulf, Who else, barry’s buddy, BP. There is more, enjoy reading link...

http://warisacrime.org/node/52692

Bill Hedges of MO 4:30PM May 31, 2011

“Paul Ryan’s premium support plan is preferable to Obama’s rationing panel”

“Here are the highlights."

“Beginning in 2022, the Ryan plan offers each new Medicare enrollee a choice of private health plans and a premium paid to the plan they choose. The key is that the premium will be equivalent to what Medicare is projected to spend under the Obama health law: $15,000 a year on average, more for the oldest enrollees, less for the youngest, all inflation adjusted."

“The Ryan proposal also includes a $7,800 annual medical savings account to help low-income seniors with out-of-pocket costs. Amazingly, the CBO analysts exclude this $7,800 benefit from their calculations. Their warning about low-income seniors suffering is baseless."

“The Obama health law leaves that up to an unelected board of presidential appointees called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a cost-cutting panel. The board is a radical departure from Medicare as we’ve known it. Congress cedes nearly all control of Medicare spending to the board on the rationale that budgeting decisions should be shielded from outraged seniors and political pressures.“Will Americans now in their 40s and 50s choose to put their health care in the hands of this cost-cutting board, or pick their own health plan when they retire?”

http://www.lincolnclub.org/2011/04/paul-ryans-premium-support-plan-is-preferable-to-obamas-rationing-panel/

_____

"Why Paul Ryan’s Medicare Is So Much Better Than Obama’s"

"Cuts in payments to doctors and hospitals under Medicare as provided in current law due to Obamacare and President Obama’s Medicare reimbursement policies is $15 trillion!"

"These Medicare cuts were the foundation for CBO finding that Obamacare would actually reduce the deficit, despite adopting or expanding three entitlement programs.

"Medicare’s Chief Actuary reports that even before these cuts already two-thirds of hospitals were losing money on Medicare patients."

"The unworkable, draconian effect of these Medicare cuts is why the U.S. Government Accountability Office issued a disclaimer..."

"Seniors would do far better each choosing their own health insurers themselves in a competitive marketplace, which is the system that has generated the highest standard of living in the world in America for all goods and services."

http://blogs.forbes.com/peterferrara/2011/04/28/paul-ryan-medicare-better-than-obamas/

http://www.912superseniors.org/2011/05/why-paul-ryans-medicare-is-so-much-better-than-obamas/

Bill Hedges of MO 3:58PM May 31, 2011

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement