How Mitch Daniels Is Pushing the GOP to Rein in Spending

September 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (17)

Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels wrote a great oped in the Wall Street Journal this week, with solid ideas for emergency measures for the GOP to propose in order to jump start the economy.

[Read more about the economy.]

He advocates a one-year payroll tax holiday, which most agree is a good idea, but even better, he says we could “offset the revenue loss twice over”--who doesn’t want that?--with a combination of policies. Those policies are: rescinding unspent TARP funds and unspent stimulus funds; a federal hiring freeze while cutting federal pay by 10 percent, then freeze it after that to bring it more in line with private sector salaries; a suspension of new federal regulations, for a time; allowing businesses to claim full expenses for new investment, in order to free up capital that is “cowering on the sidelines”; and best of all, giving the president impoundment power. Here’s what he means by that last one:

Presidents once had the authority to spend less than Congress made available through appropriation. On reflection, nothing else makes sense. Plowing ahead with spending  when revenues plummet is something only government would do. In Indiana, we are still solvent, with no new taxes, money in reserve, and a AAA credit rating only because our legislature gave me the power to adjust spending to new realities. I promise you that a president who wanted to could put the kibosh on enormous amounts of spending that a Congress might never vote to eliminate, but the average citizen would never miss.

Republicans should not only say no to bad Democratic ideas, but put forth a few good ideas of their own. It’s one thing to give voters an opportunity to vote against bad policies; it’s another thing to give them some common-sense proposals to support. Voters are hungry for an alternative to Obama’s big taxing, big spending agenda. While we’re waiting for the GOP to give them that alternative, take a look at Mitch Daniels’s campaign Web site, MyManMitch.com. (Is that him riding the Harley?)

[See an Opinion slide show of 5 bad Democratic policy ideas.]

President Obama likes to go to Elkhart, Ind., to show his concern for the victims of the Great Recession--he has visited the town three times and first unveiled the administration’s stimulus package there--and MSNBC decided to create “The Elkhart Project” to document the everyday impact of the recession on citizens. But there’s a flip side to the story, which is what Daniels has been quietly doing to turn Indiana around and move from bankruptcy to the state’s first-ever AAA credit rating. Take a look at this video on YouTube, which is from his landslide re-election campaign, and you’ll see why so many of us think the best answers for what’s wrong in Washington are going to come from states like Indiana.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Mitch Daniels,
recession,
Indiana,
2010 Congressional elections,
Barack Obama,
economy,
Congress,
taxes,
federal budget,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mark of VA,

I'm not a big believer in quoting Wikipedia in general, but specifically in this instance I think it presents a simpler view of the idea rather than an Accounting manual.

"Payroll tax generally refers to two different kinds of similar taxes. The first kind is a tax that employers are required to withhold from employees' wages, also known as withholding tax, pay-as-you-earn tax (PAYE), or pay-as-you-go tax (PAYG). The second kind is a tax that is paid from the employer's own funds and that is directly related to employing a worker, which can consist of a fixed charge or be proportionally linked to an employee's pay."

I believe you to be speaking of the first kind of payroll tax required by employers to be withheld from an employees wages, in which were the wage earner to have too little withheld by the employer could produce a "surprise" (nightmare seems abit strong) come April.

I believe the Gov. Daniels to be referring to the second kind where an employer pays from his owns funds for the priviledge of employing a worker.

As an employer, I am happy to withold taxes from an employees' wages (either alittle or alot as she may decide) and then forward those payroll witholdings on to Uncle Sam as he requires.

But (far from a nightmare) I would be REALLY happy to have a suspension of the payroll tax paid from the employers' funds (me in this case) solely because I chose to hire someone and "meet" a payroll on the 1st and 15th.

There is a BIG difference.

Michael of IN 12:29AM September 15, 2010

Mark of Virginia. Pretty sure "payroll taxes"is another term for the combination of social security and medicare taxes. Has nothing to do with income tax (or withholding of same). This would be a huge savings for both businesses and employees (maybe 8% of payroll for many companies and employees)--but would cost those already hurting entitlement funds a ton of money.

Bruce Beaudin of NC 3:28PM September 14, 2010

Payroll tax holidays only put off until next April payment of taxes. It is a feel good move for the uninformed who won't put aside the money and will be faced with a nightmare situation when they actually file their tax returns.

Mark of VA 2:40PM September 14, 2010

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement