Border Security Bill a Good First Step for Democrats

August 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

This just in: Following a similar measure in the House, the Senate passed a $600 million package to improve border security. The funding will pay for 1,500 new National Guard troops along the border, a pair of unmanned aerial drones, and military-style bases on the Mexican border. The legislation is paid for by higher fees on foreign companies who have more than 50 employees here on H-1B work visas, which is a good thing because it means perhaps the Democrats are starting to abide by PAYGO. Politico quotes Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer:

“In my many meetings with folks on the other side of the aisle to try to gain their support for comprehensive reform, I repeatedly heard them say that once we showed we were serious about passing border security legislation, they would be able to begin working with us to fix other aspects of our broken immigration system,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the Democrats’ point person on immigration reform.

“It is my hope that the bill we are passing today will break the deadlock that has existed in Congress and will clear the path for us to finally resume bipartisan negotiations in good faith,” Schumer said. “With this bill’s passage today we have clearly shown we are serious about securing our nation’s borders."

[See who supports Schumer.]

This is only a first step, and clearly more needs to be done to secure our borders. But it’s a first step that Republicans stated Democrats needed to take, and to their credit, they have. It’s about time the administration started taking the federal government’s duty to protect our borders seriously. (Democrats should have passed this bill before they filed that lawsuit against the state of Arizona.) 

Republicans should give Democrats the benefit of the doubt and move forward on immigration reform now--which hopefully will include additional border security measures beyond this in the legislation. Today’s NBC/Wall Street Journal poll shows that more people now think Republicans would do a better job than Democrats in dealing with immigration, by a 32-27 margin. Not exactly a landslide, but it shows Republicans should not be afraid of the issue. Despite what Harry Reid said earlier this week, there are plenty of Hispanics who are Republicans--and plenty of Americans of all stripes who want illegal immigration under control.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Mexico,
Arizona,
immigration reform,
Hispanics,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Harry Reid,
Chuck Schumer

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That was my point about the judge's ruling retard Bill. She put many of the law's provisions on hold due to constitutional matters like forcing the cops to check anyone looking Hispanic.

steve of IL 11:16AM August 17, 2010

@ oldmomster: you can't blame only the Democrats. The amnesty law was passed in 1986. There have been many Republican administrations since then. Both parties are to blame. The Border Patrol has almost doubled in the last ten years to nearly 21,000 agents. In March 2004 there were 11,110 agents. In 1997 there were 6,817 agents. In 1975 there were 1,746 agents. Conclusion: both parties have made a show of stopping illegal immigration by increasing the number of Border Patrol agents. Is it successful? Not at all. Why? Aliens will find a way to get in after many tries, if not through the border, through the ports of entry with fake documents, hidden in vehicles, etc. Additionally, 40 per cent of the aliens illegally in the U.S. come to the U.S. through airports and seaports WITH visas. Both parties are derelict in their duties to the people. A big step towards solving the problem of illegal immigration would be to pass a law requiring: 1) issuance of "counterfeit-proof" Social Security cards, 2) requiring ever new employee to present a Social Security card AND checking it through a Federal government database, 3) requiring every employee to present a government issued ID in the same name as the card, and 4) after getting that process instituted, having every current employee not already checked go through the same process.

@Jose of CA: why hasn't your U.S. citizen wife filed a visa petition in your behalf so you could leave the country, pick up your immigrant visa, and return as a "green card" holder?

The Eagle Knows of CA 9:03AM August 16, 2010

Well JUDGE Sue Bolton didn't agree with you.

Sheriff Joe of Arizona continues.

Steve says:

"Obviously Bolton's concern was constitutionality"

How untrue. Police can not be forced to check. They already have that right on other laws.

Ruling did not STOP checking at all. Judge would have if unconstitutional.

Focus.

I will not respond to you on this subject if you do not call her JUDGE. Expect you are disrepecting her because of her ruling. I respect all Judges.

Bill Hedges of MO 10:49PM August 13, 2010

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement