Obama's Oil Spill Hypocrisy--Where's the Outrage?

May 24, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Yesterday, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said to reporters outside of BP’s Houston offices, “I am angry and I am frustrated that BP has been unable to stop this well from leaking and to stop the pollution from spreading ... We are 33 days into this effort, and deadline after deadline has been missed.”

Angry and frustrated that BP has missed “deadline after deadline”? Yes. Surprised? No. That’s because there isn’t much pressure from the administration to fix the situation. Sure, Secretary Salazar has been saying that BP really, really, really needs to fix this. And sure, President Obama announced on May 14 that he was imposing a moratorium on drilling new wells and granting environmental waivers. But since then, take a look at what the administration has actually been doing, according to today’s New York Times.

Since the April 20 explosion on the rig in the gulf, the administration has granted at least 19 environmental waivers for gulf drilling projects and at least 17 drilling permits similar to projects like the Deepwater Horizon rig. Just since the president’s so-called “moratorium” was imposed, at least seven new permits for various types of drilling and five controversial environmental waivers have been granted. So the administration’s actions are very different from its words.

Here’s the clincher: At least six of the drilling projects that have been given waivers since the leak began are for waters that are much deeper than this one. Some of the wells are classified as “ultra” deep water--in fact, four of them are deeper than 9,100 feet, the Times reports. No wonder BP isn’t getting the message to pick up the pace on stopping the leak. They’re getting a different message: Pick up the pace on drilling more deep-water wells. And pay no attention to that silly “moratorium.” 

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not against offshore drilling, done right. Most of us agree that once we get this leak plugged, we should make sure it doesn’t happen again--and then move on with a forward-looking plan for developing domestic sources of energy.

What I’m opposed to is saying one thing and doing another. If a Republican had declared a moratorium and then continued to grant waivers for even deeper wells--while the live-streaming video of thousands of barrels of leaking oil, and “optics” of oil-soaked birds and wetlands continued for over a month--the screams from the left would be deafening. When it comes to Democrats and the environment, it’s different. There’s a huge double-standard going on here.

Tags:
energy,
Gulf of Mexico,
Ken Salazar,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (37)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I sent a message to the Obama Administration, advising that they use the Russian deep diving submarines to cut the pipeline, flush with the seabed. Then drop 20,000,000 pounds of granite boulders on the hole in the earth's crust. of couse, this advice was rejected, as obama , wants to giv BP the opportunity to rake in as much of ste oil as possible. Please, pressure him to close the hole in the earth's crust.

Ronald L. White, JD of AL 12:08PM June 25, 2010

I understand to a degree, why the oil spill recovery/response is frustrating, slow or even the same as it was thirty years ago... I understand that government ( Any country's government ) has been slow to implement law and/or statues that would make safe oil drilling mandatory. I understand the frustration of the devastation of an ecosystem, financial lifestyle of a town, providence... this is nothing new, this happens every time there is an oil spill, regardless of the magnitude of quantity... especially since nothing has changed in terms of response.

What I don't understand is: considering that a bottom-kill is the most effective way to stop an oil spill, and that drilling that said well is a precise science, since the bottom-kill must meet the spill to work; why aren't these bottom-kill wells in place before a spill happens?

Why aren't these bottom-kill wells implemented as part of the oil rig entire in the first place? Yes i realize that they have to drill to the location of the break,but that drill is a horizontal one. What is stopping any oil company from having a vertical start point in place from the start? Rather than, drilling vertical and then drilling horizontal to the location? Surely, with 21st century technology there must be a way to make platforms vertically so that regardless of the depth of piping, all one needs to do is go to those lengths and then drill horizontally to the damage.

I understand it would probably cost more to build an oil rig using this common sense idea, but doesn't safety, and the ramifications of not doing so outweigh the cost? In the long run it would save money, and bolster profits of everyone affected, including the oil industry themselves.

It seems to me, by having those vertical ports already in place, that would speed up the time for response that would be guaranteed to stop the oil spill leak with the greatest degree of protocol. And that's for all oil wells. Those to be built and those already in existence. The voracity of the spill would be lessened and the most best way to limit the collateral damage of these spills would be maximized.

Wouldn't they?

Jonathan Yard Jr. of NY 5:35PM May 31, 2010

How come these people can selectively choose to bypass the laws we have, then say the problem is they need more power with more laws.

All Salazar's office had to do was not protest against and maneuver around the ruling protecting that area, and then not on top of it give BP an actual categorical exception to the National Environmental Protection Act. Now they act like there wasn't enough laws or power, when they used what power they had to work around the law protecting us.

A of CO 10:49PM May 28, 2010

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement