Health Insurance Companies Invest in Fast Food Chains

April 16, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Outrage of the day: Harvard researchers have discovered that some of the biggest health insurers have invested billions in fast food companies. CBS is reporting a study from the American Journal of Public Health, which found that nearly $2 billion has been invested by insurers such as Prudential Financial, Northwest Mutual and Massachusetts Mutual--who are among the life, health and disability insurers named in the article--in fast food companies such as McDonald’s, Jack in the Box, Burger King and Yum! Brands. According to CBS News:

The authors write that the recent passage of health care reform will likely expand the reach of the insurance industry, arguing that if insurers are to play a greater role in healthcare then they should be held to a higher standard of corporate responsibility.

 "There’s a ton of irony in it," said Boyd, a psychiatry professor. "In order to generate profits, they will invest in any area they need to … to make money, even if what they invest in, in this case fast food, is an industry that is known to cause people to get sick and to die early."

I recently attended a briefing on childhood obesity at Children’s National Medical Center and listened to an expert explain the metabolic weight obesity places on every cell in the body. When someone is obese, every one of his or her organs is affected, and it reduces life expectancy dramatically. The fact that insurance companies are investing in fast food joints confirms the negative image many Americans have about the insurance industry. As Jerry Seinfeld would say, “Who was the marketing genius who came up with this one?”

If they were smart, they’d switch those fast food investments over to companies researching a cure for diabetes, or promoting organic and sustainable food, or building affordable sports equipment for kids in underserved neighborhoods. Wouldn’t you think they’d be investing in ways to have fewer claims in the long run? Don’t life insurance companies want fewer payouts because everyone is living longer and paying premiums?

What’s next--they’ve invested in Big Tobacco too?

 

Tags:
McDonald's,
obesity,
diabetes,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
weight loss

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"At $585.3 million, Massachusetts Mutual owns even more stocks in tobacco than in fast food. Philip Morris, one of the nation’s leading tobacco firms, is the insurance company’s greatest investment, at $412.6 million. "

http://www.baystatebanner.com/health18-2010-04-22

colin of TX 12:53PM April 21, 2010

While it is immoral... it makes sense. While health insurance is meant to protect us, it IS a business. The goal of a business is to compete and bring in profits. Can anyone really be surprised? It would be different if it were a non-profit organization and/or received government funds, then they would be held to higher standards. Because they are private, it is up to us, the consumers, to demand better practices. Easier said than done.

My Insurance Life of CA 5:59PM April 20, 2010

Is it "immoral" for companies that market themselves as providing "health maintenance" and "health care" to invest in businesses whose products make their own customers sick, reducing their life expectancy?

In this land one can claim anything (PR), yet do the opposite, claim the moral high ground and then go play 18 holes of golf, happily knowing that you'll not lose a dime of profits. Because, as the original commenter implies, profits are all that matter.

And yes, for anyone with an understanding of ethics, it is immoral.

Jonathan Quimbly of NY 5:04PM April 17, 2010

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement