Obama Was Wrong to Criticize the Supreme Court

January 29, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (82)

As the dust settles on the State of the Union address, I can't stop thinking about the one memorable part of the evening. My mouth dropped open when the president looked the justices of the Supreme Court in the eye and criticized their recent decision on campaign finance law. Here's the video of what the president said and Justice Alito's reaction. Vice President Biden piled on the next day, telling ABC News, "The President didn't question the integrity of the court. He questioned the judgment of it." The decision was "dead wrong," and an "outrageous decision," he said. "Not outrageous in the fact that these guys are bad guys, but outrageous in the way you read the Constitution." Leave it to Biden to tell us what the president really thinks: the justices are "dead wrong" in reading the Constitution and he questions their judgment as "outrageous." Now opinions are flying on both sides. On scotusblog.com, there's a round-up of the commentary with links to interesting articles, but I'm going to leave the legal analysis to the lawyers and just say I thought the President and Vice President were disrespectful.

I come from a family of courtroom lawyers, and I know that a good lawyer never publicly criticizes a judge. Of course there are exceptions--for judges who engage in openly unethical behavior and must be removed from office, for example--but on matters of case law and legal judgment, it's just not good form. There's a good reason: questioning the wisdom of judges--especially the ones sitting on the highest court in the land--undermines public faith in our judicial system. It chips away at its legitimacy. 

Imagine if Ronald Reagan had given a State of the Union address and turned to the justices in the front row to say that Roe v. Wade had been wrongly decided. Unlike this time, I don't think the Democrats in the chamber would have stood and applauded. 

It was upsetting when the president first criticized the justices' decision in his Weekly Radio Address--in what the Christian Science Monitor called "unusually testy language"-- and I'm sorry now that I didn't write about it then. Maybe if more people had reacted to his criticism as over the line right away, President Obama would have thought twice about going after the court for a second time in front of 48 million viewers. The president knew that the Supreme Court justices would be powerless to defend themselves in that setting, and he did it anyway. It seemed like bullying to me. 

Justice Alito doesn't strike me as a hothead. I've seen him give a speech, and he's a pretty unemotional person. For the justice to react even just by shaking his head, says to me he felt provoked. Despite the president's cool, aloof, lecturing way--or maybe because of it--Barack Obama has a way of really provoking people. 

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (82)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"For the judiciary, resisting this temptation is particularly important, because it's the only branch that is unelected and whose officers serve for life. Unfortunately, some judges give in to temptation and make law instead of interpreting. Such judicial lawlessness is a threat to our democracy -- and it needs to stop."

Pres. George W. Bush, 2007

Did your mouth stay shut that time?

Valerie Fahey of WA 9:58AM April 07, 2012

Obama is an embarrassment to all American and should show respect for the rule of law and our Supreme Court Justices. He might be interested to learn that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is…….…not his.

Obama has failed, and is continuing to fail to faithfully execute the office of President. Presidents do not get to pick and choose which laws to respect and which to ignore.

Obama may not like some of the federal laws enacted by Congress and may not like some of the decisions determined by The United States Supreme Court – the man took an oath and should not be allowed to attack our independent judiciary during a State of The Union.

Citing duration of settled law does not illuminate any basis for maintaining or overturning any law but rather it shows incompetence and disrespect to the Supreme Justices which were in an environment where they could not respond.

The president cites duration of law when it suits his political ambitions, and on the other hand cites policy when long standing law contrasts with his political ambitions – such as federal immigration. The administration’s decision to cause the DOJ to bring suit against Arizona even though State Law advanced the specific purposes of federal – because it would benefit him in the Hispanic community.

In America we advance legislation properly, we do not abuse the judicial process for personal political gain, nor do we use the judicial system secure de facto legislation which prevents States’ from enacting laws to advance federal law.

E.M.

Scottsdale, Arizona

E.M. of AZ 7:59PM August 07, 2010

The president is part of a political system. the supreme court is the judiciary. One represents the people and one the law. That the representative of the people can't express dissent against the determiners of the law is silly. The representative of the people can be voted out, the court can't. As well, this conservative court has been very out front with expressing there conservative agenda and what they believe is a strict interpretation of the constituion. The constitution is a living document. Not one that the founding fathers believed infallible or else why would we have the ability to change it. The conservative majority on the court seems to have no qualm about changing law. Too bad reagan (alzheimers) and both dolt, silver spoon bushes saw fit to load the court with ultra right dogmatic conservatives. Great judgement.

clay of TX 7:14PM March 10, 2010

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement