Public Doesn't Like Healthcare Bill, So Democrats Must Buy Votes

December 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (38)

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

It hasn't been pretty today. It's all coming out, the deal-making by Democrats trying to secure the 60 votes needed to move their healthcare bill forward in the Senate last night. The Hill newspaper reports on some of the goodies, including $300 million in extra funding for Sen. Landrieu's home state of Louisiana, and millions in extra Medicaid dollars for Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson.

On Good Morning America this morning, Sen. John McCain was asked why Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was trading so much money for so few votes: "Because they [Senate Democrats] haven't got the American public ... 60 percent of the American people are against this. They want it stopped and they certainly—as they find out more about this unsavory process we've been through, the Cornhusker Kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, the Florida FlimFlam and all of the other kinds of dealing that went on—they'll find it very distasteful." Earlier, on Fox News Sunday yesterday, McCain said that by not going in a more moderate, bipartisan way with Republicans, Democrats were down to the wire, buying the votes of lawmakers within their own party. "That's why they're in the position of having to buy the last voter," he told Chris Wallace.

He's got a point. An ABC News/Washington Post poll confirms how unpopular the bill is, and one of the most interesting findings is that two-thirds of those polled think the legislation will increase the federal budget deficit—something 43 percent said was "not worth it." Taxpayers may want some form of healthcare reform, but at what cost?

I just don't think anyone has a good feeling about this—not only about all the deal-making and special treatment in exchange for votes, but about the legislation itself. It's been very confusing and not very many people can tell you what's in the bill and what's not. Yet when White House Advisor David Axelrod was asked about the polls on Meet the Press yesterday, he said, "What I suggest is that you guys wait until next October to talk about polls, when they're actually germane to an election, because that's an eternity away." What Axelrod is saying is that the only polls that count are the ones held on Election Day, and by raising the stakes and predicting that the Democrats will prevail in the 2010 mid-terms—which he did in that interview—he's making the same bet that Republicans are. Which is why not one Republican voted for this. Republicans in the Senate think the American people are with them as they try to slow this massive spending down, and I think they might be right.

Tags:
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (38)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

scale browsers past developers

sheffieldb of AR 1:32AM February 27, 2010

Whether someone is for or against this health care bill, they need to write THEIR REPRESENTATIVES and demand they stop spending our money on earmarks. When people realize that the bill includes billions (or more) of needless spending and bribes and that this will cost EVERYONE huge tax increases, they may think twice about supporting it. I say, tell your senators to pass the bill WITHOUT earmarks! Then they will pass it based on it's merits, not on it's bribes. It won't happen because these people are greedy pigs, who don't care about us at all. Why are all the Senators millionairs? These back room bribes should be illegal!

Regardless what party you support, vote in new blood at the next election. We need young people who actually care about this country! Time to vote out the "old boys club"!

donna of FL 3:11PM December 31, 2009

Well, it seems like Congress is up to not so old tricks; Bribery can be defined as, "Financial gain, for the promise of a vote". I guess this is practiced, because the American public sits by and does nothing about it.

I think there are anti-bribery laws in place for such conduct amongst Congress? US CODE, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 11, § 201

This can be debated...

One thing is for sure, if they intend to stick me with large fees for not having healthcare, due that I can not afford it, they better get ready for a fight, cause I will not pay fees associated with legislation that is passed in a corrupt manner. That is against every American's Constitutional rights.

I would hope, that a jury of twelve, would not subject anyone to pay fines, associated with corrupt legislation, which is passed in an un-lawful manner?

Greedynewscom of NY 8:30AM December 27, 2009

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement