AIG Bonus Demagoguery Is a Distraction. Turn the Page.

March 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I've been avoiding writing about the AIG bonuses, because my children need a mother. Really, I've been taken aback at the level of vitriol this week on TV, in newspapers, and in the blogosphere: the calls for Treasury Secretary Geithner to resign over what he knew about the AIG bonuses and when he knew it; the anger at Senator Dodd for allegedly inserting the loophole that allowed the bonuses in the first place. On Tuesday, there was the appalling statement by one Republican senator that AIG executives should resign or "go commit suicide." Then, CEO Ed Liddy told lawmakers yesterday he'd gotten E-mails suggesting AIG leaders be executed "with piano wire around their necks." Take a look at the language in Maureen Dowd's most recent column on the subject of the "arrogant, greedy creeps who knee-capped capitalism." Columnist Tom Friedman said the anger among Americans "is reaching a 'Bonfire of the Vanities,' get-out-the-pitchforks danger level." The amount of grandstanding on Capitol Hill and in the press is approaching demagoguery.

"The desire for culprits at times like this is strong," former Labor Secretary Robert Reich told the New York Times in the understatement of the week. He's a short list of culprits in the crosshairs these days: AIG's Ed Liddy, CNBC's Jim Cramer and Rick Santelli, Secretary Geithner, radio host Rush Limbaugh, Merrill Lynch's John Thain, and countless hedge fund managers. (Not to mention the top 10 percent of taxpayers, but that's a blog for another day.)

That same Friedman column is the best thing I've read lately. In it, he explains what he thinks the administration will propose to fix the toxic assets problem. Friedman also mentions that as aggravating as these AIG bonuses are, the fact remains that they are part of signed contracts agreed to between two legal entities. And under our system of law, a signed contract is a binding legal promise. We believe in the rule of law, and if the government goes around abrogating contracts, Friedman points out, no one will ever invest in the United States. A contract is a contract.

So as much as these bonuses make us all angry, I think it's time to get back to what's important here. Am I the only one struck by the fact that these bonuses total $165 million—a drop in the bucket when we're talking on a daily basis about billions and trillions of taxpayer dollars? They're infuriating, but in the scheme of things they pale in comparison to what's at stake here. We've got to let them go. In the words of the country song, they're whiskey under the bridge.

With the Fed stating that we remain in a severe recession yesterday as it announced it was purchasing another trillion dollars' worth of bonds to pump money into the economy, we might want to direct our energy toward the larger questions here—like whether that move will lead to inflation and higher consumer prices, or whether it will encourage more economic activity and lower interest rates. We should be debating the proper role of the Fed in a crisis and the level of federal intervention in our markets we want as a society. We should figure out how to prevent this from ever happening again. We need to focus on things like how to get people back to work, how to revive our economy without bankrupting America, and most importantly, how to rescue the banks. You can't tell me that fighting over pay for executives at one company is a top priority right now.

It seems President Obama feels that way. He stepped up to the plate yesterday and took responsibility for the AIG bonuses, in an effort to close the book on that one. Then he held a town hall meeting in California to explain his economic proposals; I caught the tail end of it and thought he did a great job. I'm not crazy about his going on Jay Leno tonight, but holding a second town hall meeting today with Republican Governor Schwarzenegger is a good idea. So is his prime-time press conference scheduled for next week. Time to get the American people to put down the pitchforks and talk about the important stuff.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
AIG, Inc.

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

+1

soundtracks of AL 7:42AM July 17, 2009

As I suspected, the only thing president O'Bama is good at is campaigning-talk is cheap-although he sounds good.sid

sid peterson of IN 12:51PM March 23, 2009

Mary Kate... you open with "I've been avoiding writing about the AIG bonuses..." yet here you are, writing about it. And where did you get your $165 million figure from? Another of you TJ Street bloggers quotes you with that figure and in the same story quotes Washington Post story that the figure is over $400 million. Did you "fact check" the number? Did your TJ Street commrade "fact check" it? He definitely didn't note any reason for the discrepancies for what he was "reporting"? Did the Post report/editor/publisher "fact check" their number?

Personally I feel there is too much blogging and too little reporting. We the people know too little about the federal budget and money process because the news media doesn't "report" on it, they "blog" about it with a few "facts" they don't explain. Then the people, and our government representatives, with too few facts and even less knowledge about the subject get outraged and propose knee jerk reactions because they don't have the facts.

Example... lots of stories and blogs talking about the FED buying trillions of dollars of bonds to pump money into the economy (even stated by you above). WHAT??? Is this one US government agency spending money to buy bonds from another US government agency? Where did the FED get this trillion dollars? Did they print the money? Wait, I think the Treasury prints the money, so if the FED did then that would be counterfeit. Did they borrow it? Was it just lying around? SOMEBODY needs to REPORT about this process and let us know what's really going on? This could be just as diabolical as the selling and reselling and reselling and reselling of risky mortgages and the derivatives and insurance polices for these mortgages and derivatives that put us in this mess to begin with.

Your "story" quotes this media source and that media source. Do you go out and get any of this information on your own? How much does USN&WR pay you to sit and read other stuff then quote a line or two and add your twist on it? And how do I get a cushy gig like that?

Phil of NJ 11:54AM March 21, 2009

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement