Stock Market Needs Certainty, Not Geithner-esque Waffling

February 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

As yesterday's stock market slipped ever lower—Dow down 250 points, S&P Index down 26, Nasdaq down 53—I thought of something said at a symposium I attended over the weekend marking the 20th anniversary of the first Bush administration. Andy Card, former deputy chief of staff for George H.W. Bush, pointed out that in February of 1989 the Dow jumped to 2250. By the end of that administration, the Dow ended up even stronger at 2700 points. Hard to believe, isn't it? And it wasn't that long ago. Amazing what's happened in just 20 years.

It reminds us that everything is relative. While the first Bush administration had its economic problems, such as the S&L bailout and the budget crisis, times were pretty good for most Americans—and yet the Dow was nowhere near what we're now all used to.

Today investing seems stalled, and stocks are taking a daily beating. And while there's plenty of blame to go around when it comes to how we got into this mess, some of the problem seems to be the lack of certainty about how we're going to get out it. There's a "let's wait and see where things go" sort of attitude among most of the people I know who would normally be active in the stock market. People are hungry for some direction from Washington, and instead we're getting Geithner-esque "details will be coming soon" stalling. Maybe we'll nationalize the banks, maybe not. Maybe there'll be a second stimulus package, we haven't ruled that out yet. Maybe we'll sell the toxic assets, but we don't know yet how to value them. Wasn't it Geithner who urged fast, decisive, aggressive action to keep the markets strong? 

Markets need certainty, and there doesn't seem to be a lot of that right now.

For example, I am a member of a volunteer board that supports a local charity here in Washington. We have a small endowment from which we make multi-year pledges to support current programs. Well, when it came time to pay this year's pledge, we chose not to take our payment out of our dwindling endowment funds—all tied up in the stock market—on the advice of our volunteer who is a stock broker. Now is not the time to be selling stocks to pay this bill, she said, and so we're not touching our account when we otherwise would have been selling. Instead, we're paying our pledge out of cash we raised at a fundraiser—money that otherwise would have gone into the investment account to grow. So we're not buying or selling right now. It's better to just wait and see what happens, we all agreed.

It's not just fat-cat investors on Wall Street who are waiting to see what the administration's plans are for the various bailouts and economic recovery efforts. It's teachers pension funds, it's folks holding 401K funds, it's volunteer boards at charities. I'm hoping the President speaks clearly tonight, and gives all of us some idea of what's next. Then maybe investors—big and small—will get off the sidelines and back into the market. Otherwise, we may be back to the days of the Dow at 2200.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
economy,
economic stimulus,
stock market,
recession

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hard to believe we're lucky that it happened sooner rather than later. The world economy was headed for an inevitable crash due to runaway debt financing and resource/environmental depletion. If financial responsibility had not dragged down the banks, a later, larger crisis, a debt bubble of many trillions, would have led not only to what we have now, but also to a devalued currency and a balance of payments panic. Difficult to believe because the bottom has not yet been reached. So when will it end? Somewhere between "soon," ""who knows." and "never." Closer to "soon" than "sooner" but who knows. Laws of unintended consequences. Too many head-fakes ratcheted up over-leveraged financials.

Leonel Ceniceros of TX 7:45PM March 04, 2009

But one era has ended for now, and another has begun. The "confidence" this time around can't be in tech stocks going to the moon, or in houses going to the moon, or in elective wars being cakewalks. We likewise are not going to believe much in CPAs and ratings agencies blessing the likes of Enron and Bernie Madoff. Our man Obama actually has more substance than the two Bushes, McCain and Palin all put together. Time will bear this out. But you're gonna have some slow years regaining the trust that has been blown in 2001-2008.

Muser of NM 1:58PM February 24, 2009

There is another reason people are pulling out of the markets.

Yes, the President needs to stop the "Sky is Falling" crap, but investors also want to know that they have a fair and honest market with which to invest in. During the past 18 months we have heard nothing but scam after scam. It's time to put some of these million dollar boys in jail and seize assets to repay those that were robbed.

Larry of CA 1:52PM February 24, 2009

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement