• Comment (30)

Elizabeth Warren and What Really Makes a Native American

May 4, 2012 RSS Feed Print

In an old sepia-toned photo, Greenberry Jenkins sits upright, unsmiling as all people had to do when exposures were agonizingly slow. But one gets the immediate sense that the camera did not matter much to him—this was a man who went through life with a poker face.

Greenberry Jenkins

He wears the black Sunday suit typical of a mid-19th century farmer in the American South. A black, broad-brim hat adds a touch of religious modesty.

The most American thing about my great-great-grandfather, however, is his face. The Asiatic cast of his eyes, cheekbones that cut right under his eyes, a dark complexion, even the whiskers on his chin that managed a thin, white spray, speak to our ancestors who came to North America not by boat, but by walking across the Bering Strait.

[See the latest political cartoons.]

My grandmother, who inherited Greenberry's Native American features, was understandably fearful in the 1930s of how her West Texas neighbors would regard someone with a bit of nonwhite blood. So she maintained that she was of "black Dutch" ancestry (in this context, ancestry from darker-skinned Europeans).

Nowadays, except when noticing my son's straight, coal black hair, I give my distant Native American heritage no thought. It wasn't until this week's news that Massachusetts senate candidate Elizabeth Warren had listed herself as a Native American in the Harvard law school directory for nine years that I got to thinking about it again.

Did checking that box also help Warren, a Rutgers University-Newark law school graduate, get her job on the most prestigious law school faculty in the world? The professor who hired her insists that it did not. But certainly by checking that box, Warren had allowed the school to tout her as a minority hire—which it did.

[Brown, Warren Spar in Massachusetts Senate Race]

I faced a similar moral choice when I applied for college. I had, in fact, checked the box "Native American" when I took the SAT. When the time came to apply to college, I thought the better of it.

I went with "white."

Why did I make that choice? Because I am. I'm at most 12 percent Native American, meaning the great majority of my ancestors were as British as bangers and mash. One doesn't have to look far to find many white, black, and Asian-American people whose ancestry contains such whispers of an Indian past. Example: My office mate Josh Gilder, and contributor to this blog, is a novelist and former Reagan speechwriter, who now takes his family on summer vacations to canoe in New England lakes. He has roots that go deep into New York's Dutch and English colonial past. He is also a direct descendant of the Siwanoy chieftan who planted an axe in the skull of Puritan dissenter Anne Hutchinson.

Does a little blood alone make Josh a Native American? No more than it does me—a view he shares.

Elizabeth Warren's family lore held that her great-great-great grandmother was a Cherokee. Genealogists at the New England Historic Genealogical Society could not validate this claim.

[Elizabeth Warren's Quiet Support for Public School Vouchers]

Seeking clarification, I called the Cherokee Nation and spoke with spokeswoman Lenzy Krehbiel-Burton, who said that to be a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, one must provide proper documentation of direct descent from someone listed in the Dawes Rolls (closed more than a century ago) to obtain a tribal citizenship card.

"We have a running joke in Cherokee country that when you meet someone who knows next to nothing about Indian country, but claims they're Indian, chances are they'll claim they're Cherokee," Krehbiel-Burton says.

People who have—or think they have—Cherokee ancestry may not be able to document their eligibility for citizenship, but they are encouraged to learn about Cherokee history, language, and to participate in the Cherokee National Holiday in Tahlequah, Oklahoma.

So what makes someone Native American? Clearly, genes alone don't do it.

Many members of the Cherokee Nation are fairer than I am. Some are blonde and blue-eyed. But they are genuine Cherokees because they have been raised in a tradition of a people who successfully mixed European ways (and genes) with Native American life centuries ago, and invented an alphabet to express that way of life. They and their line maintained this heritage in the face of Andrew Jackson's terrible ethnic cleansing called the Trail of Tears and ever since.

Let's leave that little box for them.

Tags:
Elizabeth Warren,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (30)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mark,

Sorry my lengthy and detailed responses were a source of annoyance. But a healthy "back and forth" can be a good thing - especially, if there is intelligent and thoughtful dialogue, supported by facts. I still take issue with the premise of your article "What Really Makes a Native American" and your repeated statements that you somehow have "more" of right to make this claim than Warren; and that you might really "have" Native ancestry, while Warren doesn't. This trivializes tribal membership and ignores the real measures of tribal identity. My argument is that you missed the mark completely in that regard. Your claim to Native ancestry is entirely the same as Warren's. And by the way, you do realize that her family has the same family lore that was passed down in the family for generations, right? She didn't just make it up. It was passed down in her family just like in yours. It was based on nothing but pictures, cheekbones and rumors. No documentation or proof of community recognition were ever shown. It is EXACTLY the same with Greenberry descendants. And yet the piece that is missing in your article (and in Warren's claims) is what "really" makes someone a Native American is political and social affiliation to a tribal nation. You should be able to clearly identify an ancestor as being a citizen of a tribal nation, from a family recognized as being part of that community (wheter federally-recognized, or state-tribes, or remant communities working on recognition process). It is important to clearly state that you have an ancestral tie to a tribal family that is recognized by the specific tribal community.

I would certainly agree with you that it would be inappropriate for you to have claimed Native status based on your Greenberry Jenkins "lore," just as it is totally wrong for Warren to have done so (and is still doing!) based on her O.C. Sarah Smith descent. And your closing paragraphs are spot on -- no issues with the thrust of that argument. There are many blue-eyed, blond Cherokees that can lay claim to Native status because their family never gave up on the Nation and always continued their political and cultural affiliation. That is the main point.

Tom of WA 5:38PM July 23, 2012

Tom

The whole point of my piece was, indeed, the speciousness of white people claiming to be Native Americans. My only assertion in response to your many and lengthy comments has been that I had more reason to make such a claim than Elizabeth Warren.

And had I done so, I would have--whether based on truth or family legend--enjoyed the preferences that go with being a minority. Even if true (which I believe it was) it would have been unfair to real Native Americans.

I think most people will see the reasoning behind this piece. At this point, you seem far more interested in my genealogy than I do. I'm done.

Mark of VA 12:14PM July 23, 2012

Mark,

How ironic. You've eschew the need to prove descent from recognized tribal members (with proven tribal affiliation) when you want to assert your supposed Native "heritage" ...while you bash Warren for believing the exact same family stories that run in her family. The phenomenon is EXACTLY the same. And now you mention a DNA test as a basis for proof? What about comedian Larry David's DNA test? His results came back as 37% "Native American" and yet, he is entirely of Eastern European Jewish ancestry. That is the flaw in the so-called Admixture DNA tests. They only look at sequences along SNPs, and prevalence. But, many of these sequences are found in entirely different populations. It is an algorithm, not exact science. And the only tests that could prove direct Native lineage are the Y-DNA and mtDNA tests. What was the Y-DNA test for Greenberry descendants? The only way to put this to rest is if there were direct maternal descendants from Greenberry's mother (and sisters, maternal line aunts and cousins, etc). The mtDNA should be A,B,C,D or sometimes X. That would the the only genetic proof of Native ancestry.

I'm not saying there isn't a chance that Greenery had some degree of Native ancestry. it cannot be proven by admixture testing of descendants 5-6 generations removed, nor has it been established by geneaology and community recognition. This was a man who got a "head right" land grant by the Republic of Texas in the 1840s. He was recognized as a White man in his day (Indians and Blacks were excluded from Texas citizenship then) and was, in fact, a slave owner living in White society with no connection to any Cherokee community. Doesn't matter what he "looked" like, or how you view him in his black and white photos. Just like it doesn't matter what Warren said about Aunt Bea's remarks on their supposed Indian features and cheekbones. Native ancestry is proven by simply stating one's descent from a recognized tribal member. It is as simple as that.

Tom of WA 9:45PM July 22, 2012

Mark W. Davis

Mark W. Davis

Mark W. Davis, co-author of "Digital Assassination", is a former White House speechwriter, now a senior director with the Washington, D.C.-based White House Writers Group.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.