Court Ruling Against Rahm Emanuel Devalues Service

January 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Rahm Emanuel would probably be the best mayor of Chicago, considering who is running for the office. But that's not why the ruling yesterday of the Illinois appellate court is so egregiously wrong. It's because the decision totally devalues service to our country.

The court ruled that Emanuel was not truly a resident of the city and so did not qualify for the ballot. [Read 10 Things You Didn't Know About Emanuel.]

Emanuel was born and raised in Chicago. He not only owns a house and votes there, but he served as a congressman from the city for three terms before being tapped as President Obama's chief of staff.

No matter what you think of Emanuel and his fiery temperament, there is simply no doubt that he was in Washington serving the nation.

If he were a member of the military stationed overseas who decided to return home to run for office, would he similarly be disqualified?

Emanuel has filed an appeal with the Illinois Supreme Court, and one can only hope they act quickly to reverse this decision since the ballots are on the verge of being printed and early voting begins next week. [The year in cartoons: 2010.]

It is Chicago after all, and there are undoubtedly many layers of political chicanery behind the ruling, which reversed the decisions of a lower court and the board of elections.

But the Illinois Supreme Court needs to do the right thing. Emanuel was in the nation's capital serving his country, and that fact needs to be acknowledged.

The voters of Chicago should have the chance to decide whether Emanuel will be their next mayor—not a court.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
politics,
Chicago,
Rahm Emanuel

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I too am sick and tired, Joe of CA, and here we are--stuck in the Golden State whose luster has been tarnished by the me generation of politicians in our state capitol(Not, contrary to the blatherings of others,those retired public servants).

Jill of CA 6:25PM January 31, 2011

Cities, big or small, need leaders that are in touch with the city by living in it daily, period. It would be foolish to qualify General "whatzhizname" for a mayorial race just because he/she listed their address as that city but didn't live there for two years while serving in a foreign land.

This author is obviously biased.

John R of AL 6:26PM January 26, 2011

There are many determinants of legal residency, such as where you pay state income taxes, vote, have a drivers license, claim a homestead exemption on real property taxes, stated intent, etc. -- it's not just a matter of where you hang your hat. If that were the case, Cheney would have been ineligible to be VP, as the 12th Amendment, state that the President and Vice-President shall not be inhabitants of the same state. Cheney was an inhabitant of TX for years prior to his election, but, so the story goes, maintained his WY drivers license. I don't know when or if he voted in WY, paid taxes there, etc., but the license was enough.

James of MO 6:20PM January 26, 2011

Linda Killian

Linda Killian

Linda Killian is a Washington journalist and a senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. She is currently working on a book called Swing about Independent/Centrist voters for St. Martin’s Press. Her previous book was The Freshmen: What Happened to the Republican Revolution?

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement