Obama's State of the Union Address Had Everything and Nothing

January 28, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Linda Killian, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The obvious question following President Barack Obama's bravura State of the Union performance is what happens now. As so many have said and written, it was a good speech. And Obama delivered it in the same smooth, effortless way he might perform if he were playing a basketball pick-up game with members of Congress--a little humor, a little self-deprecation, some spine-stiffening encouragement for his teammates, and some taunting of his opponents thrown in for good measure.

The speech hit all the bases. There was something for everyone. There was talk of a jobs bill and concern over the economic plight of anxious middle-class families. There was a call for a spending freeze and acknowledgement of the importance of reducing the deficit for independents and blue dog Democrats. There was a proposal for a small-business tax credit, elimination of capital gains taxes on small-business investment, and tax incentives for businesses investment, which elicited a tremendous cheer from Republicans in the House chamber. And for his liberal base, he made sure to blame George W. Bush and the Republican Congress for the deficit he inherited, called for gays to be permitted to serve openly in the military, and vowed to fight on and not abandon healthcare reform.

There were optimistic Reaganesque references to the American spirit and greatness, such as, "I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight."

The speech had everything and yet in a way it had nothing. People could hear in it what they wanted to hear and take from it what they wanted to take. What it didn't have were details about a path forward on actually passing healthcare reform or forging bipartisan solutions to the problems and issues the speech raised.

Halfway through the speech, Obama finally addressed healthcare reform. And when he told the members, "If anyone from either party has a better approach…let me know," Minority Leader John Boehner raised his hand. But I don't think he really meant it. Some level of cooperation from Republicans might have been possible six months ago, but following the elections in Virginia, New Jersey, and most notably Massachusetts, the GOP smells blood in the water and will probably see little advantage in helping the Democrats out of their health reform quandary.

Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York told me after the speech he thinks Obama was "the game changer in chief." Weiner said health reform may have been near death but Obama's speech was "the equivalent of an EMT with those paddles." Although Obama gave no specifics about the way forward in passing health reform, Weiner said the speech "did enough for me." Weiner said he doesn't think Democrats want to abandon six months of work and are determined to pass something. But Jason Altmire, a moderate Democrat from western Pennsylvania's 4th District who voted against the House healthcare reform bill last fall, doesn't see it that way. "I think the opportunity to do that has passed," said Altmire.

Altmire said he doesn't think the House will pass the Senate bill, there are mixed feelings about trying to do something through the reconciliation process, and doing reform in pieces won't work. "I don't know that Congress has the appetite to continue the fight," he said. Altmire was cheered by Obama's talk of a spending freeze and trying to tackle the deficit, and he believes that is what the American people are most concerned about along with jobs and the economy. "They don't feel like Congress is addressing the issues that are important to them."

Altmire and Weiner, at different ends of the ideological spectrum within the Democratic Party, represent the challenge for Obama in trying to hold together the Democratic congressional coalition as well as include Republicans in the process.

Obama can talk about coming together and finishing the job for the American people, but based on the past year, it's not at all clear that Democratic congressional leaders, chief among them Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have any real interest in working with Republicans or including their ideas in legislation. And now, the Republicans may not have much incentive to try.

Tags:
speeches,
State of the Union,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Yes I have read Marx and he was a racist. Maybe that is why Belarus means White Russia. You are right about programs that take money from those that have and give it to those that have not being socialism. Thats why Wilson, FDR, Truman (who created the CIA) and Johnson are the antithesis of the American way.

One thing that Hitler and Marx and Sanger had in common. They loved Darwin's theory of evolution. He is the racists ultimate leader of foolishness. You aura dawn appear to be a racist also.

There is one race in this world.... The Human race and you are defined by your working sexual organs. Male or Female. Nothing else!

Facism is government control without government ownership. That is where this Obama wants to go!

Jeff of WI 6:23AM February 02, 2010

Hey, Mr. President, What are you going to do about the Thirteen Millon Illegals? Are you going to include them in the Census and gradually allow them the benefits of American Citizenship? They don't pay taxes and they don't vote, but they do cost our country money by having all of real Americans pay taxes to provide benefits for these Illegals. Most of the time it appears that you are sticking your head in the sand so you don't see this problem. How can we have Security in our country when our government can't control the Illegal People who have sneaked into our country. Perhaps you would say that you are aware of who is a dangerous illegal; but if that is the case, then why haven't you deported them? Our economy would be better if they were deported and Americans would have healthcare because the government would not have to provide the expense of providing care for them. Children born in this country should only be given American Citizenship if at least one of the parents were in this country legally.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY 2:20PM January 31, 2010

“Preamble”

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Note_ “provide for the common defense”

Your absolutely nuts.

Military is funded by taxpayers, but not socialism. Your definition of socialism is very self-serving.

Bill Hedges of MO 5:14AM January 31, 2010

Linda Killian

Linda Killian

Linda Killian is a Washington journalist and a senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. She is currently working on a book called Swing about Independent/Centrist voters for St. Martin’s Press. Her previous book was The Freshmen: What Happened to the Republican Revolution?

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement