Should Congress Ban High Capacity Gun Magazines?

February 22, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter argued that gun magazines should not exceed 10 bullets; the NRA's Chris Cox wrote that such a ban would lead to innocents being harmed. A sampling of reader comments:

I have two pistols that I routinely carry legally for self-defense. Both of these pistols have magazines higher than 10 rounds. I did not commit a crime using my firearms, so why am I to be punished? The next time someone commits a mass murder with a vehicle, are we going to see pushes for stricter licensing, lower capacity fuel tanks, and walls built around all roads? Remember, mass murder can be committed with five gallons of gasoline and a match, both perfectly legal to own. Change your argument from pistols to cars or word processors or some other legal possession and see if your argument makes sense.

PHILLIP CLEMMER Leesburg, Fla.

Yes, of course the Congress should ban high-volume ammo clips. When all else fails, common sense should prevail.

JIM HALL Vienna, Va.

This proposed ban is nonsense. The assault weapons ban and the 10-round mag ban did nothing to curtail crimes with guns. Notice I did not use the term "gun crimes," because guns by themselves, being inanimate objects, cannot perform any actions or crimes. A person must use the gun in an illegal manner. Every time some evil person uses a gun to perpetuate a tragic event, the gun grabbers and control freaks seize on the incident and exploit the victims' pain for their own twisted agenda.

JOHN FARRAR Mansfield, Texas

After reading Chris Cox's position on large-capacity magazines, it just goes to show how the NRA has helped to create mayhem in this country. I am not opposed to the Second Amendment or the right of citizens to own guns. However, I would like to see the NRA become more responsible in encouraging saner gun use. Large magazines have one purpose, and that's to kill as many people as quickly as possible. To use the lame argument that you would want this capability if you were being attacked shows what little common sense the NRA uses in promoting the abusive use of automatic guns and large-capacity magazines. I would like to know how many cases the NRA knows of where a private citizen had to and successfully used a large-capacity magazine to fend off multiple attackers.

GEORGE MAVROS Lancaster, Pa.

Banning guns, magazines, clips, or cosmetic features has never worked. Never will. There are already millions of magazines in circulation. You can't confiscate them all, and banning further sales will only make them more valuable. If such a law passes or is in the process of being passed, expect the market to be flooded with millions more magazines before it takes effect. The only difference between magazine capacity is about two seconds to change magazines.

JOHN THOMPSON Stoughton, Wis.

Tags:
NRA,
Congress,
gun control and gun rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

banning the mags

will make them worth lots of money

cj of PA 10:01PM May 27, 2012

So now it is the magazine's fault that some yo-yo can go on a killing spree and kill 12-30 people with one magazine. Figures the liberal agenda at its finest. If we can't ban the gun lets make it harder and more expensive to shoot until the point no one wants/can afford a gun. Brilliant. I have an idea put a ban on gun ownership by criminals, also make sure they can't use more than a 10 round mag because god knows most would need 30 to hit something 10 feet away anyways. When will gun control nuts realize guns are only as dangerous as the person behind it. We as citizens have to jump through hoops in some states to exercise our 2nd Amendment right, once approved it is an accomplishment because you have been blessed by the government with trust. So while they say they trust you to give you a gun, they do not trust with a gun that can shoot more then 11 rounds per reload, ridiculous!!!!!

james rumann of MD 7:21PM April 15, 2011

Certainly reducing magazine size is a worthy goal but it is not enough. Such measures skirt the real problem: Too many guns, too easy access. Instead of addressing the real problem, most everyone in DC seems to be hiding under their collective desk in fear of the big bad NRA and the gun netherworld beyond it. I've watched for two decades while our leaders in DC have avoided addressing this head-on. I've had enough, so I'm running for Congress to submit appropriate Resolution and Legislation as often as necessary to Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, including the Second Amendment, Along with collected links to articles and lead comments urging repeal, the resolution and legislation are at http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm . Join me. Run for Congress. Fix this.

Best wishes, --Mike, Candidate for Congress

Mike Barkley of CA 5:19PM April 07, 2011

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here several times a week. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement