Has Political Rhetoric Gotten Dangerously Extreme?

January 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

The Arizona shootings have spurred debate about today's political tone. David Brock argued that incendiary political rhetoric is dangerous; Ernest Istook argued that such concerns are misplaced. Your thoughts:

The [accused gunman] wasn't left or right. He was crazy. I can't believe there is even somewhat serious talk about banning harsh rhetoric. If we hold [Sarah] Palin responsible for what this paranoid schizophrenic did, why don't we finish by hanging everybody in Germany because of what Hitler did?

AARON COHN Harlingen, Texas

We have to face the fact that these "celebrities" are being well paid for being offensive, rude, and un-American with their irresponsible, crude, and disgusting (to me) remarks. Apparently listening to this meets some deep-seated need of the audience, whomever they are. It also meets the needs of the networks and advertisers.

PHYLLIS HOYER Frederick, Md.

Has political rhetoric become too extreme? Absolutely. Is Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin responsible for a madman's actions? Absolutely not. Mr. Brock would have us believe that if only all his previous warnings had not been ignored, the tragedy in Tucson would not have happened. Where has he been when for decades the conservative right has objected to pornography and violence in films, video games, and other public domains? The view that this has led to abuse of women and children and more violence in our communities has usually been ridiculed by the left, but now, when it suits their political purposes, they use the very same argument against conservative talk shows.

BEV WILEY Coulterville, Ill.

For me the question is: What did we do, if anything, as a community to prevent these events? Are we doing enough? Are we living up to the expectations of our kids' desires for a better country? I believe we have fallen very short. Why are guns so easy to get by mentally ill people? Why do we allow extended magazines? Why are we fixated with guns? And finally, why are we systematically demonizing good Americans that just happen to think differently than us? I hope we use free speech with great responsibility, with the intent to discuss our ideas to make a better country, not to destroy our adversaries.

JUAN MIRET Shrewsbury, Mass.

Based on his notes, YouTube messages, etc., [accused gunman Jared Loughner] definitely had it in for government officials, especially the congresswoman. He obviously wasn't a serious student of government, so where did he get his notions that he should do something about it? Hardly from musical pieces.

CARL JOHNSON Washington, Pa.

Tags:
Glenn Beck,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Интересно написано, но мне кажеться я уже это где то видел...)))

gruzoperevozki of AL 6:33AM February 10, 2011

Whether any political party is guilty of spreading hate-mongering toward one another and causing physical attacks and even death to members of the opposite political party remains a topic that would need much research. The fact that political parties attempt to "drum up" hate for opposite political parties is a FACT. The problem with this becomes dangerously complex when, literally, millions of citizens cannot differentiate between facts and propaganda. We can blame a vicious attack or assassination on the mental instability of the perpetrator of violence, but who do we blame for deceit, falsehoods, and fraud in the first place?

The dangers of an inability to identify truth is twofold:

1. Presently, the media is no longer charged with telling the truth--the media is now a "public forum," where truth can be replaced with lies, and lies without penalty. Media broadcasters are free to lie, all in the name of "our right to free speech." Is this a valid reason to lie in the media?

Media advertising is required to maintain "truth in advertising;" courts are charged with finding the truth in court cases, and exacting the truth from witnesses; hundreds/thousands/millions of businesses and industries are required to maintain honest transactions with their suppliers and their customers. In fact, without this honesty, we can easily see the complete deterioration of our laws and our commerce.

2. Does no one see that as long as truth in media is no longer expected--even required, democracy WILL die. If the average American citizen expects truth from the media, and does not get truth, how is that citizen to make an intelligent decision

about the leadership ability, veracity, and character of a potential political candidate? How does that citizen ensure democracy will continue?

There are entire Websites by investigative reporters, from all countries, who are dedicated to finding the truth and reporting the truth. Many of them are killed by their own dedication to truth. Their freedom of speech is halted too easily, while propaganda and politically vicious (but untruthful) attacks on good people are allowed in the name of free speech. What is to become of us? What is to become of the United States of America? With so much talk about the Founding Fathers' intentions, I cannot believe that they would regard the lack of truth in media as our right to free speech.

All that is necessary is what we used to do: announce a disclaimer at the beginning of each broadcast, stating whether the following media communication is fact or an opinion, and whether it is the opinion of the station, the person, the corporate sponsors, and/or the corporate owners of the station.

As long as we continue to spread propaganda and not truth, it may not be the isolated maiming or death of one or two political representatives by the "unhinged," it WILL be the death of democracy by our own citizens.

Ann Keenan of MI 12:07AM February 05, 2011

Yes the rhetoric is dangerous and the worst rhetoric is coming form the caustic right wing nuts that have taken over the GOP.

Turns out the accused gunman Jared Loughner was spouting nutty anti-government rhetoric (Glenn Beck sort of nutty talk) and repeating many of the same talking points of the right wing rabblerousers on Fox News and other hatemongers.

How quick the righties think they have absolved themselves of any responsibility for all their hate and lies. How quick the righties want to condemn on democrat for calling out conservatives for using nazi propaganda tactics, when Fox news regularly call nazis anyone they disagree with.

Nothing has changed, the rhetoric on the right is toxic and is indirectly responsible for a political climate with the trend we are in with cop killings, attempted congressmen assassinations, and general malicious hate for this country.

Eric of NJ 7:52PM February 04, 2011

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement