Political Debate on Fox

October 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

I completely agree with Julia Piscitelli. The only way to change people's minds is by showing them why they are wrong ["Why Democrats Should Go on Fox," usnews.com]. You cannot do this unless you know where they are coming from and what their arguments are. As a Democrat, I watch Fox and read Drudge—not because I agree with them. It's actually because I don't agree with them. I want to know what the other side is saying so I know how to respond. How can you fight the opposition if you're not in tune with their thought process? And you know, sometimes (albeit rarely) I agree with some of the conservative pundits' points or concerns. If Obama and White House aides gave their side on Fox maybe they could convince a few people with their informed ideas, but at the very least they will appear confident in their policies and show they can debate the pressing issues with the opposition.

Comment by Bridget of VT

A democracy depends on conflict—disagreement and exploration of all sides will always result in a better product. I'd have more respect for Obama's administration if they defended their positions on Fox instead of trying to silence Fox News. There is room for improvement though—[Sean] Hannity and [Alan] Colmes were much better than just Hannity. Fox News needs more [like] Colmes. Keep at it Julia.

Comment by Brad of TX

There's nothing wrong with thoughtful, well-reasoned debate. Unfortunately, this is not something that Fox or CNBC—to name two particularly egregious examples—are willing to foster on the air. The quality of the reporting and discourse on both of these networks is poor, and as a nation we are paying a steep price: a misinformed public and the decline of reason as a guiding principle.

Comment by Todd of PA

People aren't misinformed because of what they see or hear in the media. People are misinformed because they are ignorant. I work as a part-time manager at AutoZone; we get customers who want to buy a part to fix their car, but can't tell us if they have a 4-cylinder engine or a 6-cylinder engine. These customers are not stupid; they are ignorant of automotive basics because they were never educated. People believe or disbelieve what they hear or see in the media, or are easily influenced not because they are stupid but because they are not being educated about much of anything. In surveys and research we are constantly finding that knowledge of so many issues that we are facing today is sorely lacking both with the general public and elected officials.

Comment by Matt of TX

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This gets tiresome - having individuals referring to our country as such. It is not, nor has ever been, a democracy. It is a Republic. Remember "... and to the Republic for which it stands"?

zenpiper of NY 10:27AM November 03, 2009

Fox is one giant Rupert Murdoch lie. While smearing the POTUS at every opportunity, Fox is busily engaged in propaganda joint ventures with state-run China Central Television and The People's Daily (the mouthpiece of the Communist Party).

"In meeting with Murdoch, Liu, also member of the Political Bureau and of the Secretariat of CPC Central Committee, appreciated the active work Murdoch has done in advancing cooperation with China's news media."

--The People's Daily Online, Nov. 10, 2006

Rupert Murdoch is a man without principles. he is playing the US right wing like a violin, and he's laughing all the way to the bank (yes, he's found a profitable niche market in pandering to the right).

The only people in this Fox charade with fewer principles are Hannity and Beck, who are happy residing in Murdoch's commie-loving pocket.

heartlandboy of OH 11:15AM October 30, 2009

Peole are not misinformed and FOX is not wrong, distorted or lying. FOX uses the own words of your party and obama's followers to show the rest of us how skewered and far removed from America And her values they really are. They loathe free speech that doesn't agree with them, among other things. In America we have many freedoms. I think the most powerful is the freedom to NOT do things. I have the freedom to NOT believe what obama and his people are saying. I listen. You get it Bridget? I LISTEN TO WHAT THE PEOPLE REPRESENTING YOUR PARTY SAY! 20-years ago they would have been called traitors. 50-years ago they would have been investigated by Congress for anti-American activities. 100-years ago they would have been hanged for treason. They are a new revolution of sorts but they are the opposite of our founding fathers in whom the majority of this country still believe. We have no room for people who hate the U.S., a president who apologizes and grovels to our enemies who would kill a democrat, republican, fascist, or druid. Wake up. Do I think Obama is an American-hating traitor? Yes I do! Do I have the freedom of speech to say it? YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT I DO! And that is one thing I will never part willingly without a fight. Obama will be in for a rude awakening come election time 2010. Your party will be marginalized and he will find out the true meaning of democracy and about being a puppet president. What is my main gripe against Obama? I voted for him as a moderate but he lied and showed his true "agenda" which I do not agree with. If I had not been so sick of GWB, I would have listened to the media and all of his associations with people like William Ayers. Look at the people he surrounds himself with. "FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU. FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME."

Elizabeth Hill of CO 11:03AM October 30, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement