Extending the Home Buyer Tax Credit?

September 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

By extending this credit, it would give a lot more people an opportunity to utilize it ["Will the $8,000 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit Be Extended?" usnews.com]. My husband and I have been saving for our down payment on a house when we had to move my sister and her two children in with us, so money is very tight right now. But we are so close to having the full down payment. We expect to have all of it by January, which doesn't help us at all with the first time tax credit. Please extend this wonderful gift to allow more Americans to purchase our first home!

Comment by Lindsay of KS

I'm tired of seeing the government transfer funds from the general treasury just to prop up certain industries or sectors of the economy—autos, major appliances, home improvement or, in this case, home ownership. The government is supporting home ownership enough through the deductibility of mortgage interest, which has the unfortunate effect of anchoring people to wherever they are currently located, instead of being able to move to other cities where there are more jobs. We would be better off with more renters.

Comment by Gene of TX

I may be biased, because I work in sales related to home decor (hey, honesty is a virtue), but extending the home buyer tax credit would be absolutely wonderful for the economy. First off, when a new home buyer gets a tax credit, he or she (or the married couple, perhaps) will not only buy the home, but will also put in some work decorating it. Buying homes when prices are at their best in years (in terms of the buyer, of course, certainly not the seller) means that those who can get a mortgage and a good price on a home will then also spend to furnish and decorate, thus giving a boost to the retail sector as well as the housing sector of the economy. Extending the tax credit would definitely be a wise move for a number of reasons, all having to do with moving this economy forward.

Comment by Angie Koutrotsios of IL

I purchased a duplex for budgetary reasons a couple of years ago. I live in half [the duplex] and rent out the other half to help subsidize the mortgage. I recently got married and my wife and I would like to live in a real house and start a family. We've found a house that is within our means to make the mortgage payment, but the home needs a lot of repairs. We certainly could use the tax incentive to put back into the house (and the economy), however I am not eligible since I have purchased before, and she is subsequently penalized for having married me. We would love to see an extension of the parameters of this bill to aid responsible bill/tax paying couples.

Comment by Aaron of TX

With short sales taking 4-9 months to complete a sale, the first time homebuyers are now eliminated from buying these distressed properties since they would "close" after the November 30 deadline. This credit helps young people to get into a home and helps get these distressed properties off the market. If the banks would hire more staff to process these short sales on a more timely basis, the recovery would build and the credit may not be needed past next June of 2010. To stop the momentum that the credit has helped to build, at this critical juncture, would be a big mistake. Congress needs to put more money in the hands of real homeowners on main street, rather than line the pockets of big banks with billions of taxpayer dollars.

Comment by Bob Benson of CA

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's very clear that the previous first time home buyer's credit programs have worked to stimulate the housing market, and the U.S. economy. We need to keep those sales growing and allow as many first time home buyers as can qualify, to take advantage of a continued program to further stimulate this tremendous growth in our ecomony. I haven't seen or heard of any government intention to continue the first time home buyer's credit program past April 30, 2010 and closed sales on or before June 30th, 2010 except a 90 day extension to those who are currently serving in the military. That isn't right, Why isn't there an outcry to conintue doing something that is such a great advantage to our economy?

Could someone please look into this and let us know what's going on. We need this program.

Larry Manchester of CA 1:53PM May 06, 2010

My husband and I are in the process of buying a short sale home. We're concerned with whether we will close before the November 30th deadline. The process is long. Part of the reason we moved quickly on buying a home was that tax incentive. The majority of homes in the area that we live in are short sales or foreclosures. It makes complete sense to extend the credit. It will give buyers more incentive to buy, which in turn helps those that need to get out, and will keep the banks from owning homes for those people that can't afford to keep them. It's really a win win situation for all involved!

CB of CA 4:20PM October 12, 2009

I qualify for the NSP down payment assistance program as well as the First Time Homebuyer -- tax credit. This is the MAJOR FLAW with the program: The NSP program requires that the sales price of the home be 1% less than the appraisal. I live in Phoenix, AZ. We are competing with a frenzy of investors who are plunking down money to buy everything under $200,000 on the market. The NSP purchase requires that the home be a 'foreclosure'. It cannot be a short sale or a normal sale. The lenders who own the foreclosures are taking cash sales for less than the NSP offer because of the verbiage in the 'Eligiblity Letter', the strict requirements to get the down payment, and the 1% less than appraisal. As a result, this program; at least here in Phoenix, AZ is failing. It is October 10th. There has been only 3 NSP -- Phoenix closings with 75 families identified as eligible for the program. The City of Phoenix estimated that 700 families would be helped by the program. These families would be first time homebuyers and don't have a chance of "snow in July" of getting a home, much less the first time homebuyer credit. It is disheartening, especially since we (the homebuyer) have paid the $50 for the HUD classes, left work early and taken days off to meet with counselors and attended the classes, all to find we don't have the chance of purchasing a home for the amount of which we have been approved. We have spent the time of the mortgage people qualifying us for our LSR and to find a Realtor willing to work with us is pretty near impossible. The Realtor's as well as the 'approved' lenders and their appraisers are scared. The lender's don't want to waster their time, the Realtor's definitely consider this program a waste of time and are incredibly negative about a NSP person finding a home and don't want to write offer, after offer, after offer for 1.5% of the sales price. Plus, they don't want to spend the time understanding how to write the offer when the Realtor believes that there is not one appraiser out there willinging to do an appraisal for over 1% of the sales price.

I'd like to thank the people who thought this incentive up -- but for us; those who desperately needed a chance. This is not working. And, those of us who needed that chance -- have no hope of meeting the November 30th deadline. And, the 'monied' investors who walked away from all those financed foreclosures and the people who have lived in their homes for a year or longer without paying their mortgage: these are the people who are working the system and receiving the benefits. Wouldn't we all like to live by paying only the utilities for a couple of years.

Sharon Garno of AZ 1:35PM October 10, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement