Michelle Obama and the First Lady's Role

May 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

How about this: In America we elect the president; we do not elect the spouse [What's Wrong With American Society That Forces Michelle Obama to Tone Down? usnews.com]. It would be totally inappropriate for an unelected spouse of a president to be involved in policy making and policy decisions and potentially military decisions. The "two for one" spouted by the Clintons didn't go over so well did it? Michelle Obama is an influential woman simply by virtue of being first lady and the causes she chooses to take up. She, nor any other first lady, should be involved in policy.

Comment by Arlene of NJ

I think Michelle is making the right choice for her family. She has made the choice to support her husband and take care of her children. Her husband has one of the most difficult jobs in the world right now, and it would not make sense for both of them to be working. When Barack is finished serving his time as president, then she can continue to pursue her own career. Marriage is about sacrifice, and this is exactly what Michelle is doing. Anyways, she isn't the one who ran for president, so why would she make policy decisions?

Comment by Sandy of FL

First ladies should not have policy roles—at least not directly. Let her get elected or I would even agree to an appointment that required congressional approval and oversight. If she wants to directly influence policy let her sit in the chair and take the heat. Being married to the president does not automatically entitle her to anything more than ceremonial duties. We can accept a working spouse first lady—many marriages have both spouses working—but the key here is to earn it. Remember interviewing, being passed over, running through the gantlet to succeed? That's what we are asking for. I for one would be delighted to see a first lady that worked completely outside of government. Imagine her working a 9-5 job, brown bagging it like the rest of us. Now that would be truly inspiring—a real person with a real job juggling the real responsibilities all families have. She would have to sacrifice some ceremonial duties, but don't all marriages require some sacrifice and compromise?

Comment by Kevin Sweeney of NY

It's not over until the fat lady sings. Just you wait, and you will see an evolution. When the first lady feels secure in her role, she will become more of an influence in the political scene. Until then, she is testing the waters. Stay tuned.

Comment by Skye of FL

I think Michelle Obama is doing just fine. I think she does a lot of stuff outside her family, anyway. Furthermore, she developed a legal career on her own, independent of any man. That's pretty darn impressive and a very good example for any young woman wanting to advance herself or make a difference. Wouldn't you be concerned for your daughters and wouldn't you want to spend more time with them to make sure that they were adjusting well to their new life with their dad as perhaps one of the busiest people on Earth? The first lady can define her own role.

Comment by Joe C. of VA

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

HI SWET MOTHER

HOW IS LIFE,HOPE IT WAS BEAUITFUL AS THE PROPHET SAID,DONT FORGET ME I BECOUSE MY PARYER IS TO SEE YOU FACE.I SIMS NOT TO SEE YOUR WONDERFUL SMILL IN YOU WEB.I HAVE COMFIDENCE IN YOU AT ALL TIMES.PLEASE KEEP UP A NICE PEST, BE YOU ARE MY ADICTION.REGARD TO ABLE HERO.LOVE YOU

THANKS

PRINCE CHIDI

OZURIGBO CHIDI PRINCE of MD 8:31AM May 29, 2009

J Boud of LA:

I do not believe that at all. I think her handlers have instructed her to tone it down. The few times she has opened her mouth, she has created controversy, and I don't think the White House wants to deal with it. We know how much O hates controversy.

In the past, the media have tried to pass her off as a new Jackie, but nobody fell for that. Now they are trying to pass her off as a present-day June Cleaver. In another magazine interview Michelle she said that she doesn't even let her husband discuss his work at home because she doesn't want it in the house.

You know, men work outside the home and the little woman keeps the domestic space free of the

taint of the big bad world...Sigh

The last First Lady to move women forward was Hillary. We have stalled since then.

Karen of CA 6:23PM May 24, 2009

I agree that it would be inappropriate for Michelle to get too involved in policy. In a New York Times article I read that she was influential in getting a member of Congress to allow an Americorps bill to be passed regarding volunteer work, which she has often said is a subject close to her heart. This is a rather safe policy decision and I think it would be better for her to stay involved in non-controversial legislation like that. Her husband is the one we elected to make the difficult decisions. If it were the other way around in that she were elected president and her husband became "the first gentleman", I would not want him making major policy decisions either. If first ladies were supposed to influence policy, then they should have to be vetted by the American people the same way the President is during a campaign. She/He would have to be subject to public debates on policy and give town hall speeches about what she/he would do as the first spouse. However, that does not happen for a reason. We did not elect the first lady, we elected her husband. Though many people (feminists in particular) are commenting that somehow she is doing a disservice to women by giving herself the "mom-in-chief" label during her time as first lady, I think it is a wise decision. She attended Harvard and Princeton along with being a successful lawyer and having high powered job as vice president of a hospital. She does not have anything to prove to anyone. She is making it clear who is number one in her life right now and I think she should be respected for that as a woman who can make her own decisions, and as mother. Every child deserves to know that they are the most important thing in the life of their parents, especially during their developmental years and Michelle is making damn sure her girls and the rest of the world knows it. They are now the most famous children in the world with a father who I'm sure loves them very, very much, but he is the busiest man in the world right now with TONS of responsibilities on behalf of our entire nation. One of the parents has to stay home to nurture and help the kids adjust. Also, her "mom-in-chief" label does not limit her as many feminists have also suggested. I think it actually opens her up to many possibilities for the kind of issues she can take on. It weaves a common thread into her support for military families, work-family balance, volunteer work, healthier eating habits, and making the arts more available to children, which we have seen her do in the months since she has become first lady. I am sure there are many more great things she will be able to do in her role in later months and years and I for one, can't wait to see. As a young woman I am in awe of her grace and coolness during this whole process of settling into her role as first lady. herself. She is a very confident and

self assured lady. I wish I could be more like her.

Ari of NY 9:27PM May 23, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement