Meghan McCain, Reagan Republicans, and RINOs

April 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

I am a young female fiscal conservative, and I cannot associate myself with the Republican Party due to its position on social issues ["Reagan Republicans Know Meghan McCain Is Wrong About Gays," usnews.com]. Meghan is correct in her assessment; the Republican Party cannot get the votes of most young adults when religious nuts are allowed to drive policy. I won't vote Republican, because they do not represent me. I am a third-party voter forever. The tea parties were a ground swelling of libertarians and fiscal conservatives and have nothing to do with the Republican Party. Fox tried to spin these protests but the majority attending would tell you they are not Republicans.

Comment by Dawn of TN

Peter Roff hit the main point right on the head. John McCain ran on positions nearly indistinguishable from Obama's, and lost. "Me too" politics will only help the Democrats, and deny the Republicans any chance to profit from Democratic mistakes. Meghan McCain's claims are a recipe for defeat, written by the daughter of a loser.

Comment by Dave of IL

Doesn't small government mean that government should stay out of the bedrooms and personal relationships of citizens? The only arguments I hear against same-sex marriage are religious. The Constitution prohibits established religion. How is banning gay marriage going to help the 50 percent divorce rate among heterosexuals? A gay marriage ban is big government run amuck. Rest in peace, GOP. You are toast!

Comment by Teddy Hilton of MO

John McCain lost the election not because of trying to capture the middle of the political spectrum and be more like Democrats, but because he had to maintain too many far-right positions for the sake of expediency and to please his base. McCain in 2000 was a much stronger candidate, without all that "Drill Baby Drill" hubris that he needed to engage in, in order to placate the small but vocal crowd of Limbaughites. Meghan McCain is right; the Limbaugh and Hannity crowd are the irrelevant ones, and the Republican that can communicate acceptance of the real American values like tolerance and multiculturalism will be the next savior of that party.

Comment by Bob of NC

It is amusing to once again see a Republican talk about limited government while trying to stuff the government into the most intimate parts of people's lives. Barry Goldwater himself believed that gay rights were a personal issue and opposed the don't ask, don't tell policy as inappropriate, believing instead that gays should be allowed to serve openly. He was strongly opposed to religious litmus tests for political office and was a strong supporter of the separation of church and state. It just goes to show how far right the GOP has shifted when it finds the positions of the founder of the American conservative renewal to be "too liberal." As far as John McCain ... he lost his mainstream support because he pandered to the extreme right to get nominated. Moderates were his strongest supporters and guess what? They threw in their lot with Barack Obama.

Comment by Cal of CA

At least someone in the party is trying to think of ways to move forward. We live in a new world, now. That tends to happen as the decades pass. We can admire Reagan's ability to lead the people on sheer charisma. We can look at some of his policies and see how they might fit into the global landscape we are seeing, but to suggest the answer for the Republican Party is to revert to a 1980s vision of the world is not only appalling, but dangerous. Meghan McCain may not have all the answers, but at least she is stimulating constructive dialogue. I admire her for being brave enough to speak out against the tired, befuddled, misguided, arrogant, blind leaders who drove this party to its ruin. George W. Bush did not single-handedly destroy our country. He had the help of the whole Republican machine. Every Republican in Washington and elsewhere owns a piece of that culpability. Thank God there is someone finally saying, "ENOUGH!"

Comment by Tim of NY

Holding to the fundamental values of most Americans—marriage between a man and woman, support for families to build a strong social fabric, economic opportunity, growth, progress not just change—will prevail, not Meghan's recipe for pablum.

Comment by Edward G. Stafford of TN

Her [Meghan McCain] latest sentiments indicate she would like for all Republicans to become the dreaded RINOs [Republican In Name Only]. Meghan is poorly mistaken if she thinks that conservatives are a dying breed. She says she is conservative, but she wants us to be more liberal, she wants us to be more like, what's the word? Oh, the Democrats, that's right. Myself included, over 95 percent of our tea party attendees were participating in their first political rally. We're motivated, and we're ready to be heard. What we are NOT willing to do is roll over and paint ourselves in a Democrat suit just to get in office. After all, that's what too many Republicans in office have been doing and one of the main reasons we're so ticked off and mobilized to put an end to it.

Comment by Natalie Nichols of TX

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Meghan's not alone. The Libertarian party is looking mighty good to a lot of us fiscal conservatives who have had enough of the nanny conservatives.

The self-appointed and self-proclaimed "true conservatives" are holding the Republican party hostage. They're determined either to take the party over or to destroy the party forever. They tried their best to hijack the Tea Parties. They claim to support our troops - but never miss a chance to attack a genuine war hero (McCain) with more vitriol than they attack Obama. They made sure McCain lost this election and cursed us with Obama.

The so-called "true conservatives" are desperate and thus using whatever bully tactics they can muster for their attempted coup, dividing the party and deliberately making it impossible to stop Obama. If they can't have what they want, then they don't care. Self-serving, self-centered, and self-gratifying scum.

May they soon rest in torture.

Mia of AZ 6:28PM April 28, 2009

We watched McCain suck up to the liberal press corps and actually refer to them as his base! Conservative, my eye! We warned him for years and routinely predicted that the moment he would run against a democrat instead of undermining Republicans - he would be in for a rude awakening. As soon as he opened his mouth the NY Times started slamming him left and right and left him whining like a scorned woman. After years of undermining and slamming conservatives while bending over for liberals, McCain thought he could be a RINO and get away with it. Truth be known - Obama won because he campaigned as a moderate to fiscal/social conservative while McCain did nothing but attempt to water down whatever few conservative beliefs he had thinking he could fool genuine liberals.

Now Meghan McCain - following in the same inept steps of her father - thinks that the quickest way to get liberals to vote for Republicans is to advance homosexual marriage. After getting creamed in an election where her stupid father had the nerve to act surprised when liberals voted for a genuine liberal and conservatives like me refused to reward such intellectual dishonesty - she advocates that the quickest way to make the Republican party strong again is to start acting like a bunch of pandering liberals!

Here is a flash for you honey - Conservatives have MORE RESPECT for liberals who act like liberals and believe in what liberals believe in than half-assed Republicans like your witless father who is too cowardly to run on the party ticket where sophestry like yours works.

Tyler of CA 11:05AM April 22, 2009

Edward G. Stafford: "Holding to the fundamental values of most Americans—marriage between a man and woman, support for families to build a strong social fabric..."....

OK, Mr. Stafford...same-sex marriage is now legal in an increasing number of countries, as well as Massachusetts and Connecticut, (and soon, Vermont, Iowa, and probably New York). Can you point to a single documented way in which the "social fabric" of Canada, Spain, or Boston has suffered as a result of this? I mean, a SINGLE WAY? Has the already astronomical divorce rate increased? Are even more heterosexual men shooting their wives and children? Is Belgium suddenly going down the tubes? At least most kids raised by same-sex couples are actually wanted. I'd sure rather be the kid of my child-rearing pals Joseph and Jon than of Bristol and Levi.

mishi of CA 5:39PM April 21, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement