DHS Right-Wing Extremist Report Reactions

April 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

As a veteran, and a conservative, I read the DHS report and was not offended ["The New McCarthyism: DHS Reports on Right-Wing Extremism," usnews.com]. It said right-wing extremists (white supremacist groups, et al.) were targeting U.S. veterans. I remember this going on at [Fort] Bragg [N.C.] and other military bases a bunch of times. To be fair, gangs recruit from the U.S. military too, and some even send their members to the military for training. Not to mention Ali Mohammed (al-Qaeda's Special Ops guy), the guy who grenaded his officers prior to [Operation Iraqi Freedom], and the sailor who sold us out to the Taliban. I think DHS erred when they said "a percentage" when it's more like a fraction of a percentage are drawn toward these groups; but anybody who thinks this was politically motivated by Secretary Napolitano needs to have their tin foil hat adjusted.

Comment by Johnny of VA

When DHS submitted a similar report in January on left-wing groups, where was all the hyperventilation? Oh, I forgot, some of us are adults and some are whiny children, who cry on cue. Republicans seem to lurch from hissy-fit to hissy-fit, while the rest of us get things done.

Comment by Maddie of MD

To those who think this is just Republican whining, read the report. The assertions cover many law-abiding groups and potential terrorist groups with the same broad brush. The previous report on left-wing groups, on the other hand, was actually quite narrowly tailored and specific. We have had eight years of gaffes from law enforcement (well, make that 16 with Janet Reno included). Even though Republicans did very little while in power to stop this same sort of thing, it should not be reason to excuse our current agent of "change." Hypocrisy, yes. But that does not make this report in any way right. Read the report, people. It is poorly written and full of unsubstantiated claims.

Comment by Dave of WA

The Republicans are desperate for any kind of narrative they can come up with that will energize the base. There are plenty of honest, hardworking, taxpaying, and patriotic members of the Muslim faith, and yet oddly enough no particular mention is made of them by the chorus of conservative commentators when a report talks about the dangers of Muslim extremist groups. How oddly one-sided. Today's news cycle has been very entertaining, but in a rather sad, broken sort of way.

Comment by Kurt of CA

For the past eight years we have been treated to the hysteria from various groups on how Americans' rights were being trampled by aspects of the Patriot Act. Now when a governmental agency produces a report that specifically targets any group that might be critical of the standing government, those various groups are suddenly mute. Is it a revelation similar to the one after seeing the reaction of the women's groups to the nomination of Sarah Palin, that these groups are merely fronts for the DNC?

Comment by Robert of NJ

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Beyond Place,settle open light aware face spot attach combine beautiful state bear tear enjoy government impose only up insist deal apart politics directly approach training limited drive beneath west service explain state respond breath convention rather television building award meaning express return otherwise record deep turn range investigate maybe output top welfare price together down restaurant iron city extra place force bad fair letter block no-one human short paper start but introduce approach planning kill travel such tell meet all knee pleasure character whole carefully plan grey

Runentry of 7:23PM December 26, 2009

"As a veteran, and a conservative, I read the DHS report and was not offended"

Hi I'm God, yea, I know you probably won't believe me seeing how this is the internet, but I really am! I'm the one keeping Obama alive!

True veterans are offended, you pulled the same stunt one of my friends did, by only referencing part of the definition that speaks of hate groups. If that is the case and that's how this definition exists, why was there a need to include opposition to abortion and illegal immigration as well as big government mentioned in the definition? Take it out and change the title is all I ask. Or is that too difficult for Napolitano's peanut brain? No wonder the dumb broad's never been married, is that thing even a human being?

Before you post a blog, next time read the entire report instead of picking out only a few pieces to aid the left. I also love how they used the words 'right-wing terrorist' 3 times in the report but never even once in the left-wing report said 'left-wing terrorist'. Where's the balance now? I'd be just as upset if this was McCain's doing and had some right-wing nutjob saying left-wing extremists are doing the same garbage this report gives.

you don't need to know 10:49AM April 20, 2009

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

Right Wing Extremist of AZ 10:09AM April 20, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement