Historical Connections

August 18, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Michael Barone's "We're Not Leaving," [July21-28] has shown the striking parallel between President Truman's determination not to leave Berlin in 1948 at the mercy of the Soviets and President Bush's determination (often labeled "unreasonable stubbornness") not to leave Iraq at the mercy of terrorists.

 Thus our president last year ordered a surge of U. S. troops, which was opposed by most Americans causing his approval rate to go down to 29 percent. Yet, the terrorists in Iraq got the message. Thanks to the surge, their ability to kill our soldiers and peaceful Iraqis has dramatically decreased this year. Now President Bush can see, not a fixed date, but "a general time horizon" for scaling down troop levels and at the right time reaching the goal of having the Iraqis handling their own security without a U. S. military presence. To me, George W. Bush's "stubbornness," regardless of public approval rates, in seeking to defeat the terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere makes him one of our greatest presidents.

Hans Andrae
Jeannette , Pa.

 

Leadership is not about popularity! Besides President Truman saying "We're not leaving Berlin" there was another brave man who made it clear "We're staying and so is my family". That man was my father, Brig. General Frank L. Howley, a reservist and the military commandant of Berlin, Germany, from 1945 until 1949 when we all returned to the USA and civilian life again. Our home was under the flight path into Templehoff. Later my father was asked if the noise of planes overhead every 90 seconds 24 hours a day didn't keep him from getting a good night sleep. His answer: "Only when I didn't hear them!" Our life depended on those planes and their brave candy dropping aircrews. Before the blockade started, my father, anticipating it, stored a large supply of powdered milk saving the lives of numerous infants and later earning him an honorary medical degree from the Free University of Berlin. Leadership is about a lot more than popularity.

Peter Howley
Petaluma, Calif.

 

Maybe we are not leaving, but the world of today and the United States place in it is far different from the world of 60 years ago. Sixty years ago the US had prevailed in mankind's greatest upheaval. In 1948 the US had the bomb and had used it, we were the world's only super power. Today we are the world's largest debtor and that is the difference between then and now. Of course Iraq is not the USSR. There is no question that we can and will prevail in Iraq, but we, those of us who are blessed to be able to remember the "Berlin Air Lift", will always stand in awe of that feat.

Robert Wilkins
Apple Valley, Calif.

 

How can it be argued the invasion of Iraq and the Berlin airlift are comparable and therefore, President Bush should "stand fast" as President Truman did in 1948? Is dropping food and candy from airplanes for less than a year and without shots being fired at American pilots the same as troops on the ground being killed by an enemy in a war that has been going more than five years?

Sidney L. Willens
Kansas City, Mo.

 

If we hadn't had the surge we would have the troops to send to Afghanistan where Marines are being killed due to the shortage. And I remember the purpose of the surge was to give the political leaders in Iraq time to make progress. I don't see the political progress. I do agree with the clear lesson that the men and women of the American military are capable, but that has nothing to do with decisions made by Bush.

Chet Briggs
Penn Yan, N.Y.

 

Michael Barone could not have selected a more inapt analogy than a comparison of Bush and our current circumstances in Iraq to Truman and the Berlin Airlift in 1948. In 1945 the United States had led the United Nations coalition to decisive victory in the greatest war in history, a necessary conflict against genocidal Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and Fascist Italy. In the Berlin Airlift we used airpower to avoid direct confrontation with the USSR and consequent casualties by flying over the Soviet blockade to supply newly democratic West Berlin. In Iraq we have not won (Gen. Petraeus constantly emphasizes how tenuous our gains are) a long conflict with an insurgency that we spawned in our unnecessary and misbegotten aggression against a smaller country. We have suffered nearly 40,000 casualties and inflicted untold death and destruction upon Iraq, while losing ground in Afghanistan against the warlords and the Taliban, the original source of 9/11. Barone's resort to praising our soldiers and fliers cannot save his fundamentally flawed analogy.

John H. Morrow, Jr.  
Athens, Ga.

 

In Michael Barone's National Interest, he says "....the kindness of American soldiers can be a national asset. ....today's national media are not disposed to tell them." U S News is part of the national media—so tell the stories of our military in Iraq, Afghanistan, wherever. In the same issue was a photo-essay about nurse Anisa Mertiri, very powerful. The positive effect of a photo-essay about the good deeds of our military in each issue would do wonders to neutralize the negative press.

Janine Macy
Toledo, Wash.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

After 5 1/2 futile years, the "surge" would not have been needed if common sense had prevailed after the initial shock and awe and invasion that toppled the Saddam Hussein regime.

The people in the streets understood it and waved to the troops and shouted, "Thanks, now go home!"

Their common sense and knowledge of what would happen if our far too few troops hung around and attempted an occupation. As the months wore on and no progress was made to bring order nor rebuild infrastructure and the once feared Republican Guard troops that melted into the general population gradually joined the various sects and brought on the guerilla war that Saddam had predicted before the invasion.

All these years later, all the injured and maimed young and old military personnel later and all the dead and still dying and still being maimed--we are told how wonderfal the "surge" succeeded.

Succeeded in what? Iraq is still a war-torn wreck. Our troops are still there being car bombed, booby trapped, shot, etc.

The elected government of Iraq now agrees with those first people in the street and wants the U.S. to withdraw combat troops on a timetable.

GWB said many times that we would withdraw when the elected government of Iraq asked us to.

So, what's the hold up now?

How many more brave young Americans must die and be maimed?

HillbillyBill of TN 6:58PM August 18, 2008

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here several times a week. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement