Rock Star Vs. Leader

April 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Regarding your articles on the charisma of Barack Obama and John McCain: Charisma is one of the most dangerous characteristics a candidate or president can have ["Every Prince Charming Has His Limits," March 17].

All too often it leads to groupthink and other decision-making problems. In fact, Irving Janis documented in his book Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes how John F. Kennedy's charisma helped cause the poor decisions leading up to the Bay of Pigs fiasco. There are many other examples of how a charismatic leader has led people into trouble because they just follow without thinking. Charisma is a good thing in a rock star, but we don't need a rock star in the White House. We need someone who can make good decisions based on solid information and careful thinking.

Harold Lillywhite
Aloha, Ore.

 

Senator Obama is young, attractive, charismatic, and offers a message of hope and change. Many of us are drawn to him and the prospect of what he may deliver. And then there's Senator McCain. He is older, his gestures are choppy, and his rallies are smaller and more subdued. And yet when I examine the lives and records of the two men, I come away with a different impression. Obama reminds one of fool's gold: Disappointment sets in when one scratches the shiny surface. With McCain, one may initially underestimate his worth, later realizing he is the real thing.

Ira Chase
Carrollton, Ga.

 

"McCain's Unscripted Inspiration" points out his lack of charisma. While accurate, McCain's problem is much deeper. His self-deprecating, almost apologetic manner of speaking makes listening to him for any length of time difficult, at best. It also raises questions as to how committed he is to what he advocates. He needs to become a more forceful speaker.

John W. Dowdle
Isle of Palms, S.C.

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Justin Ewers HAS taken a condescending, arrogant and somewhat ignorant attitude with a pre-judged concussion . . . Quite a bit like "Some" of the real estate agents he was writing about. In Short, his arrogance is getting in his own way of his ability to communicate.

I happen to have done an comprehensive analysis of this 6 years ago when my son was in high school looking for a problem to solve by high school math. At that time, our two test subject individuals needed housing. One decided to rent, one decided to buy. We set begining rent = to the 20 yr mortgage. Rents increased every 4 years, mortgage was fixed for 20 years. All maintenance, remodling and re-roofing was done at typical periods. When the mortgage was paid off, the home was sold. The 2 individuals met at the bus station with their belongings. The renter had spent more money than the buyer and the buyer doubled his money. This is not a windfall, it is doubling over 20 years with maintenance.

The triviality with which this headline hound analyzed this matter represents criminal misrepresentation of material facts, a matter that would land a real estate agent in hot water, but alas, the headline hound has no such liability as long as he can peddle his drivel to whom? Certainly not USNews?

I challenge you to seek a competent review of his conclussions and will bet my hat that you will need to run a retraction or at least a correction.

All Realtors(r) do not have the same ETHICS as all WRITERS.

A really good article would include something that could be used for a lesson plan in high schools to help our young next generation land on their feet when they enter the housing market.

Otherwise, I enjoy your offerings.

Respectful of your organization but in disdain of Justin Ewers and perhaps his editor,

Olin S. Anderson

704-694-5050

No response requested but still available for comment.

Olin S Anderson, Broker-Owner of NC 3:07PM June 28, 2008

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here several times a week. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement