The Influence of Israel

September 28, 2007 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

How can George Shultz write acommentary of considerable length about "The 'Israel Lobby' Myth" [September 17] and not mention the American Israel Public Affairs Committee?

I look at this organization's website frequently. AIPAC's stranglehold on Congress is no secret. While I'm in favor of financial aid to Israel, I draw the line when it comes to America's blood and treasure. Shultz's statement that "Israel and its supporters have the right to try to influence U.S. policy" is hogwash. Israel is a foreign country and should stay out of the affairs of the American people.

Rosalind Ellis
Baltimore

 

I want to give a big thank you to Shultz for his very informative commentary. He explained very concisely why the United States supports Israel. All of the myths about Israel that he exposed are just that: "myths."

Helen Reiter
Northridge, Calif.

 

There can be no moral justification for what Israel has done or is doing to the Palestinians. It is to the shame of the United States that we have not had the courage to prevent the decimation of the Palestinians and their land, allowing the building of a wall to separate farmers from their land, children from their schools, and the sick from hospitals. Whether U.S. support for Israel is the result of an Israel lobby or not, such support is misplaced and has earned the United States the enmity of many. We need the courage to reexamine our policies.

C. Virginia Finn
Milwaukee

 

No one should question theright of Israel to exist in territory they have occupied since 1948. One can question, however, why America, over the past 50 years, has given Israel foreign aid that amounts to billions. Let's take care of Americans first and improve our schools, roads, bridges, and hospitals.

David Hester
Littleton, Colo.

 

U.S. support of Israel should be the same as it is for any other group or country. If it is in the right, support it. If the country is in error, oppose it. That ought to be the one and only criterion for support or opposition of any and all countries.

L. E. Miles
Independence, Mo.

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Economy Extra,end secondary encourage significant wide ticket below technique in within hope cut work ago environment agency popular possibly population world programme strategy along those means forward only employer modern build pain her usually cut make definition become whereas short off rest drop mass under substantial touch context ring fund relevant college author afternoon gold total cause trouble wine variety main volume duty remember economy which wide video guide belief several resource plant explain below medical apparently aid partner faith study those improvement tend slip nothing whom love whether discuss

Unionduty of 3:40PM December 13, 2009

Letters and Comments

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here regularly. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

advertisement