• Comment (7)

Truly a Super Tuesday ... for Democrats

March 6, 2012 RSS Feed Print

It's Super Tuesday! Ok, well it might not be by the time you read this. As of this writing, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich have pretty much divided up the states, the votes, and the delegates. As of this writing, Ohio is still neck-and-neck with Romney having pulled into a very narrow lead.

All of this makes Democrats like me happy. Further, the evidence seems to suggest that at least Gingrich and Ron Paul are in this for the long haul; that makes me happier.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

Many expected that after tonight, Gingrich, Paul, or Santorum would bow out gracefully and to leave the path open for Republicans to put their money, their support, and, of course, their votes come November to Mitt Romney; but it doesn't look like that will happen.

Conservatives who feel Romney's too moderate or not right-leaning enough, or those who can't wrap their head around him being a Mormon are still uncomfortable with him as their candidate and look to Santorum or Gingrich to provide an option for them and for what ails them.

And although it was all about, as James Carville once said, "the economy, stupid," now it's about much, much more. Do we provide military support to the citizens of Syria? What happens if Israel attacks Iran? Do we push for tougher sanctions and wait? Etc.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

Americans are seeing that the president, uncontested as a candidate pretty much nationwide, will no question have the Democratic platform beneath him while seeking that second term. Americans are seeing this is about much more than just our economy, job creation, or the housing market. And albeit slowly, all three seem to be headed in the right direction.

This now comes down to our safety and security. Mitt Romney may have been governor of Massachusetts, and he might have made a lot of money in the private sector; but his experience with foreign affairs? With the military?

The president spoke Tuesday of launching attacks on Iran not being a game, I hope Americans were listening.

[Read the U.S. News debate:  Should the U.S. Discourage Israel From Attacking Iran?]

For it's Super Tuesday, and those on the right are casting their ballots for the candidate they best feel will represent them, their party, and have a shot at beating our president in November.

As a Democrat, I cringed in the past when Ralph Nader split the vote for the Democrats. Sorry, but I am elated that the Republican candidates might be splitting their own votes, not wanting to put their support behind Mitt Romney.

I guess it comes down to what matters more to them: anyone but Romney or anyone but Obama? Or perhaps they'll join many of us on the left, and even some independents, who might say: who won't lead us into war with Iran?

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
Iran,
economy,
Obama administration,
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This now comes down to our safety and security. Barack Obama may have been a Senator, and he might have made a lot of money in the private sector; but his experience with foreign affairs? With the military?

Not to mention his total lack of knowledge when it comes to history.

greta of CA 2:42PM March 14, 2012

Drstudmonkey of HI

Blinder are off and check out Nov.2, 2010 results.

Won't be another 08... We all know obuma NOW...

Bill Hedges of MO 11:56PM March 07, 2012

Every single thing you just said was said by the people backing McCain in 2008. McCain the "maverick," so attractive to independents, blah blah blah. And the conservatives will HAVE to vote for McCain once he's the nominee, right? What else can they do - vote for Hillary? He picked a veep to mollify the conservatives. So it was said in 2008, and the result was...

Um, well?

What frustrates me is the way that people like you keep saying that a carbon copy of the losing McCain campaign from 2008, run for the most part by the same tired-out consultants, is THE path to victory.

According to exit polls, only one half of the people who voted for Santorum yesterday said they would vote for whoever the nominee was. They're probably all lying, right? Because that would undermine the cornerstone of the brilliant McCain '08/Romney '12 strategy: the belief that the base will turn out and vote for whoever the nominee is. So here's my question for you: why didn't the McCain campaign succeed in 2008? And what is different about this year that will make the exact same campaign succeed this time?

Drstudmonkey of HI 1:52PM March 07, 2012

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall is a nationally syndicated radio host heard nationwide weekdays from 7-10pm Eastern time on radio and streamed live at www.lesliemarshallshow.com. Leslie is also a Fox News contributor seen weekly on The O'Reilly Factor, America Live, monthly on Hannity and she sits in for Bob Beckel as one of the co hosts on The Five. She lives in Los Angeles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement