• Comment (8)

The Super Committee's Super Failure Was Super Predictable

November 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print

I told you so. When the president put forth conditions on a bipartisan committee made up of an equal number of both Democrats and Republicans to work out a solution to our debt problem; perhaps it's the pessimist in me, but I knew it would fail.

Or, perhaps the realist?

Now I know Democrats have their own political agenda, I'm a Democrat. But, the Democrats have been willing all along to work with the Republicans and that is not the case with the GOP. Now more than ever, the GOP has shown its  allegiance to a man they made a promise to and a dying political movement. I am speaking of Grover Norquist and the Tea Party. And I'm not surprised, but it's political suicide for the Republicans.

[Read Robert Schlesinger: No, Both Sides Aren't to Blame for Super Committee Failure.]

Since March of this year, polls show there is waning support for the Tea Party; and month after month more of that support falls off. Much more attention has been given to those 99 percent-ers protesting throughout the country as part of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

And polls show that a larger percentage of Americans blame the Republicans for this "super committee" failure than they do the Democrats.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the deficit super committee.]

Perhaps it's because the American voter is more educated, more aware. Perhaps it's because they're tired of being treated as if they were stupid or mindless by politicians.

The bottom line is that the Republicans care more about their pledge not to raise taxes and care more about Grover Norquist than they do the people that elected them to the positions they hold.

[Debate Club: Is a flat tax a good idea?]

Although I commend the president for thinking the best of this group; the failure of this committee was predictable and history proves it. When the Republicans say they want to drastically cut spending and the deficit, and the president offered over 4 trillion (with a "t" folks) in cuts, they walked away and settled for nearly half.

And what of their promise? With the non-extension of the Bush tax credits and the estate tax credits, their rich buddies are getting that tax increase the Republicans feared so. 

So, they didn't let Norquist down. They didn't let the Tea Party down. But in the end, they let their rich, corporate Wall Street base down, and they also let the fastest growing segment of our population down: their parents and their grandparents, our seniors.

When former Gov. Sarah Palin said there would be death panels, who knew she would've been right all along? Not because of the president's legislation to reform health care, but because of the inability of a party to put politics aside in the best interest of the American people and our economy.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Sarah Palin.]

With the upcoming Medicare cuts, hospitals and doctor's offices will have to close. And with 10,000 people a day since January of 2011 entering their golden years, a rate that will last nearly the next two decades, who will provide care for them?

My husband is an orthopedic surgeon. He gets paid $18.37 to see a Medicare patient after their first visit. What will they cut that down to, pray tell? With that low amount, he and other doctors will not be able to provide quality care, even if they want to; heck, with that amount of money, how do you pay the staff, their insurance, keep the phones and the lights on, not to mention the malpractice insurance?!

So America, thank the Republicans. In 10 years when we don't have enough money to properly fund the military, and going forward when being a senior who is sick will surely be a death sentence because there just will not be enough medical personnel or facilities to accommodate the growing number of seniors.

I have an idea—why don't we send the bill to Grover Norquist? Since he is the Republican's messiah, he should be the one doing the saving….but I wouldn't hold your breath.

Tags:
Obama administration,
debt,
deficit and national debt,
Sarah Palin,
Grover Norquist,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

“Remember, not only did you contribute to Social Security but your employer did too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes. If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that’s close to $220,500.”

“If you calculate the future value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer’s contribution) at a simple 5% (less than what the govt. pays on the money that it borrows), after 49 years of working you’d have $892,919.98.”

“If you took out only 3% per year, you’d receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you’re 95 if you retire at age 65) and that’s with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit! If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you’d have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month.”

“The folks in Washington have pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madhoff ever had.”

“Entitlement my ass, I paid cash for my social security insurance!!!! Just because they borrowed the money, doesn’t make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!”

“Congressional benefits —- free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days, now that’s welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security retirement entitlements?”

“We’re “broke” and can’t help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless”

“In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti , Chile , and Turkey . And now Pakistan ……home of bin Laden. Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!”

“Our retired seniors living on a ‘fixed income’ receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions of $$$$$$’s and Tons of Food to Foreign Countries!”

“They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when it’s time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place? Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave ‘US’ the same support they give to other countries.”

“Sad isn’t it?”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2782579/posts

Bill Hedges of MO 8:49PM November 26, 2011

Rich of CO

I am very aware they STOLE THE MONEY. I carefully worded “Got, in theory, interest for 40 years +.”

I was arguing against david statement “DAIVID MISTAKING SAYS “Really, why should the “” It's the white elephant in the room question that everyone tries so hard to ignore” which I quoted first thing.

Was NOT SENIOR'S FAULT !!!

In the beginning Congress closed the loopholes and we were all required to buy into this. Necessary funds was paid in to support the program so we are not the Albatross around “American tax payer”...by... “decrepitude of our seniours” neck.

Now you redirect your blame to government_ “They lied to you.” Had david did that in first comment I would have written a different comment.

“American tax payer be a hook to fund the decrepitude of our seniours?!” was OFF THE SCALES of proper blame. We PAID OUR DUES...

I personally have cash, which I invest, and a job retirement to supplement my social security. I early on planned for my retirement. All I earned and paid for. “ Decrepitude” is not in my vocabulary...

You crazy liberals say “tax cut” cost. They do for “non-rich”. You use simple math and say lower tax for rich cost this much. Well it doesn't work that way. John F. Kennedy said best way to make rich pay MORE is to reduce their taxes. When not incumbered by government as barry's laws and EPA is doing, rich invest instead of hiding their money:

“According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

So are all wars bad ? Barry continued Iraq war and Senator barry was for Afghanistan war. President barry who got Nobel Peace Prize started a war encounter. I don't know about our 12 operatives arrested in Iran. Was barry planning a intervention there ? Interesting isn't it Rick ?????????????????????????????????? barry continued Bush's drones. I don't give a hoot the liberals point of view on war. I simple give the actuality of barry's actions and NOT HIS WORDS.

Barry is DEBT CHUMP___ personified___, pushing liberal ideology. You, your children and their grandchildren will be paying on that. Doing Bush 8 year debt in little over 2 years. Voters ended that trend Nov. 2, 2010. Clinton caused recession by bad home loans to poor helped by lawyer obama along with Acorn. Barney Frank said NO PROBLEM and democrats voted down Bush & McCain's regulations to try and stop the downfall on Wall Street and our Nation. Barry's HUD program was to help people across this Nation, it was like 3 States that got SOME HELP. HUD program was just TRASH as a FAILURE. NORM for barry. The GREAT obamacare doesn't go into full affect for years. Think of all those families going broke over medical bills without that insurance. NEVER MIND CBO SAYS OBAMACARE IS A---DEBT--- OF A IDEA. Proving once again we can not live with barry for 4 more years. He already replaced the peanut farmer as worse of the worse presidents...

Bill Hedges of MO 5:54PM November 24, 2011

Rich of Co.,

I take it you are all for privatizing social security , the way it was meant to be . Bill Hedges , myself alot more people would be better off . How about if the goverment spent within it's means . How about public sector unions and their drain . How about what the goverment pissed Bills and others money away on , whether we wanted to or not . Have you or any in your family gotten help ? If so thank Bill Hedges .

Hunter of WI 12:26PM November 24, 2011

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall is a nationally syndicated radio host heard nationwide weekdays from 7-10pm Eastern time on radio and streamed live at www.lesliemarshallshow.com. Leslie is also a Fox News contributor seen weekly on The O'Reilly Factor, America Live, monthly on Hannity and she sits in for Bob Beckel as one of the co hosts on The Five. She lives in Los Angeles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement