Obama Should Withdraw From Afghanistan

June 22, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

Tonight, the president will address the nation from the White House. The topic? The withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. How many? Well, we won’t know until the president shares that with us this evening, but most speculate 10,000.

Ten thousand. It sounds like a lot, but it isn’t. We have 100,000 troops in Afghanistan, and we’ve been engaged in that war for a decade now. Ten thousand is only one tenth of the troops who are there.

Now let’s talk about why we’re there. How did this all start?

Briefly: The Taliban was created in reaction to warlordism and lack of Pashtun representation in the government of Kabul. In ’94, they captured Kandahar, in ’95 Herat, and in ’96 Kabul. Then at the end of 2000, the Taliban occupied 95 percent of the country of Afghanistan. At that time, they had the highest infant, child, and maternal mortality rate in Asia. The country was covered in landmines, approximately 10 million of them.

The United States in 1998 sent cruise missiles to attack Osama bin Laden, whose camp was located in Afghanistan. In 2001, we invaded the country of Afghanistan. We bombed that country, a lot, and it had little effect, except for on the mosques, aid agencies, and hospitals we destroyed; and the innocent men, women, and children who we killed, including Al Zawahiri’s wife and several of his children: He’s still alive and now heads al Qaeda. The Northern Alliance fought against the Taliban and won, and most of the Taliban fled to Pakistan, yet the American military remained and still remains there. With just one tenth of the troops being brought home, it would seem we will be there for a very long time. I feel this is a very big mistake. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on Afghanistan.]

So I must pose the question, what was our mission? Was the mission accomplished, to quote G.W.?

Here’s my checklist:

So why are we still there?! To remove those landmines? No, Afghanistan still has one of the largest concentrations of landmines out of any country in the world, despite the efforts of many nations and causes (Australia stated in April they will clear more than 7 million square acres of land fraught with mines). How about those hospitals, mosques, and aid agencies we destroyed? Have we rebuilt them? Well, the good news is that health clinics, roads, and mosques are being rebuilt as part of an effort to support local community development and economic vibrancy, but it’s not enough. There was far too much damage done, and the Afghan people recognize this. And what about those mortality rates? It’s lower, but by less than 2 percent. [See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

We constantly talk about cutting spending, our growing deficit, as well as our growing much-neglected domestic issues. Bringing the troops home from Afghanistan is one of the—albeit it, few—areas where both left and right agree.

President Hamid Karzai said we are dangerously close to becoming occupiers. I believe that is more than a sign that it’s time to come home. We have worn out our welcome. If the mission was accomplished, and if we’re there to train and hand off the country of Afghanistan to its rightful owners, the Afghan people, it’s more than time we take the training wheels off and allow Afghanistan to sink or swim on its own. And, more so, they have asked us to. [Read more about national security, terrorism and the military.]

So, although bringing 10,000 troops home is a start, it won’t put a dent in our debt, and it’s a much smaller pace than sending 30,000 troops at a time when we had a surge.

When the Taliban was oppressing the people of Afghanistan, they needed us; now Mr. President, we need us; America needs our troops, their families need them. Bring our men and women home.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
national security terrorism and the military,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Barack Obama,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

...Contractors in Afghanistan as there are Military Members?

War profiteering is not a new career move. It has been going on for years. Taxpayers are blind to what really is going on. They are being shielded by the media. Apathy and Arrogance are going to be the downfall of America.

Bring KBR and the other large contractors to justice...stop milking lives and money out of people who cannot fight back!

Terry Fillmore of MI 4:55AM June 23, 2011

Obama added 68,000 troops to Afghanistan. Now he promises to cut 33,000 before the 2012 election. That will still leave the number of troops in Afghanistan doubled from when Obama took office.

In 2008, Candidate Obama's promised Afghanistan was the price of would-be President Obama's hoped-for domestic program. ALL THE LEFTIES KNEW THAT FULL WELL IN 2008 AS THEY CRAWLED IN BED WITH THE BUSH-CHENEY NEOCONS OVER AFGHANISTAN.

Now all the late-to-the-party hand-wringing weasel lefties go, "Oh my, bring all the troops home sooner!!!" YOU BIG WORTHLESS SACKS OF S!!!

Well, you got your $787 billion mega-wazoo stimulus. And you got your extra-special little $26 billion something for teachers in Aug. 2010. And you got your Sotomayer and Kagan, and you your pro-abortion president, among other things. AND ALL ALONG YOU WEASEL LEFTIES KNEW OBAMA'S 32,000 to 100,000 AFGHANISTAN TRIPLING ESCALATION WAS GOING TO BE THE PRICE FOR ALL OF THAT!

What you weasel lefties didn't know in 2008, because NOBODY reasonably expected such then, was that PRESIDENT DEMOCRAT MEGA PRICK WAS GOING TO START A MORE-BUSH-THAN-BUSH THIRD WAR, IN LIBYA.

So add Obama's 'non-war' Libya to Obama's tripling of Afghanistan involvement as the price for what you got domestically.

YOU BIG WORTHLESS SACKS OF S!!! And you are such because Obama could start a FOURTH WAR, somewhere, anywhere, between now and the 2012 election and you weasel lefties would STILL vote for his reelection, because even though now that we as a country are beyond plain flat broke you STILL think you can get some more goodies from Obama domestically, like tax increases on the 'rich.'

All along Ron Paul was in front of your weasel leftie eyes beginning in 2008, just as he was in front of everyone's eyes. And with a Paul presidency, we wouldn't have quagged chin-deep in Afghanistan, all four wheels wouldn't have come off in Pakistan AND Yemen, Iraq would have been folded up, we wouldn't have gone DFA in Libya, and we STILL WOULD HAVE GOTTEN BIN LADEN VIA THE CIA. ALL OF THAT, without compromising our national security. But with a Paul presidency, you weasel lefties wouldn't have gotten what you wanted domestically.

So just stuff a sock in it Marshall, about your views on Afghanistan. You and all other lefties have ZERO credibility on the subject. All along the way, even BEFORE square one, President Obama's 'smart' 2009 Afghanistan war was Senator Obama's 2002 DUMB war. The late-2001 smackdown of the Taliban in Afghanistan was short of the best-possible scenario but was as good as it could get. And all along, getting bin Laden was a CIA thing -- WHICH DIDN'T REQUIRE 68,000 ADDITIONAL BOOTS IN AF-PAK.

If things weren't bad enough, THIS is the biggest bone-head move in Afghanistan: Creating a 300,000+ member Afghan army, training it, and STOCKING it -- now, and being on the hook to do so in the future. Whether we leave ten years from now or tomorrow, creating that national army for a country that doesn't exist beyond lines on a map as drawn by the British and Russians will fold like a wet towel and scatter to the four winds. DOUBLE- AND BETTER-DEALING IS THE WAY OF THE WORLD IN THAT PART OF THE WORLD. What we are seeing in terms of double-dealing escalation in Pakistan? That's Afghanistan's future as well.

dom youngross of OH 2:25AM June 23, 2011

it would seem the only expedient thing that might slow his plummeting popularity.

So he's willing to throw our collective security under the bus, disregard the advice of the military charged with the prosecution of the war, fails to provide tangible results showing the Afghan people are capable of sustained self-governance all in an effort to save his re-election?

Sounds just like the guy we want as president of the United States.

david of ID 6:19PM June 22, 2011

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall is a nationally syndicated radio host heard nationwide weekdays from 7-10pm Eastern time on radio and streamed live at www.lesliemarshallshow.com. Leslie is also a Fox News contributor seen weekly on The O'Reilly Factor, America Live, monthly on Hannity and she sits in for Bob Beckel as one of the co hosts on The Five. She lives in Los Angeles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement