6 Myths About Obama's Libya Policy

March 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (31)

I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!

What am I mad about? The attacks on the president coming from both the left and the right. Well, here are the accusations and here is my response:

The president violated the Constitution with our involvement in Libya

The president did not violate the Constitution. First, this isn’t a war; we, as followers of the international community through the United Nations, imposed a no fly zone and a cease fire, to which there were consequences specifically outlined in Resolution 1973. Second, according to The War Powers Act of 1973, the president can send troops without congressional approval if there is an emergency. I ask you, is genocide an emergency? The answer is yes. The president has to notify Congress within 48 hours. The resolution was passed on a Thursday, he notified Congress on a Friday, that’s 24 hours by the way.  And the president has 60 days to get congressional approval (we’re in day six of this now so he has 54 left), and if they do not give him that approval, he has 30 days to bring those troops home. When George W. Bush got congressional approval to invade Iraq, he received that approval based on a lie. Is presenting false information to Congress to get the vote and outcome you desire unconstitutional? I wonder. [Read Robert Schlesinger: Is Obama's War on Libya Constitutional?]

The president should be impeached for his actions in Libya

Then so should have Harry S. Truman for the Korean War, Bill Clinton for the Bosnian War, and George W. Bush for the second Liberian war and the 2004 Haitian Rebellion. On at least 125 occasions, the president has acted without prior express military authorization from Congress. These include instances in which the United States fought in Korea 1950, the Philippine-American War from 1898–1903, and in Nicaragua in 1927. [See photos of the unrest in Libya.]

We can’t afford this!

Then where was the outrage when we dropped bombs, then sandwiches, then overthrew the Taliban who seem to be in control of Afghanistan again to the tune of nearly $500 billion!? And how about Iraq? The invasion of that sovereign nation has cost us $802 billion. And by the end of fiscal year 2011, that total will be $1.29 trillion, with a “t” folks. And they’re talking about Libya costing us approximately one billion in months!? [See political cartoons about Afghanistan.]

The American people don’t want this!

The American people also don’t want us to remain in Iraq or Afghanistan and haven’t for years. Unlike his predecessor, this president, Barack Obama, will listen to the people and bring our troops home as he already proved with the troops who were brought home from Iraq. By the way, the American people also want immigration reform, public workers to keep their collective bargaining rights and affordable healthcare. Obviously the president isn’t the only one who hasn’t been listening to the people.  [See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

The president was out of town when this happened and troops were injured!

The president doesn’t need to be sitting in the Oval Office, the war room or the situation room when a resolution is being carried out by international forces any more than George W. Bush had to stay in D.C. during the majority of his presidency while we were involved in two wars: Iraq and Afghanistan. Why was it okay for George W. Bush to go to his ranch in Crawford or to Camp David and not okay for President Obama to be striking deals to help us have more affordable oil, advanced technology, and perhaps job creation due to future consumerism in Latin America at this time? It is terrible that anyone is injured in a military conflict. Our military is the best without a doubt. The brave men and women who defend our freedoms along with those people in other nations, whether it be Iraq, Afghanistan or yes, America, Libya, that is unfortunately a risk they take in fighting for such freedoms. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

We’re failing in Libya!

Hello. This started on Friday. Let’s give it more than a week, shall we? No wonder we have a 54 percent divorce rate; people don’t want to stick with something until it’s finished. The president said this mission will be handed off to the allies leading the mission, perhaps within days. He also stated our military will not step foot in Libya–no ground troops will be sent in. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Middle East protests.]

 

Tags:
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush,
Libya,
immigration reform,
Congress,
politics,
Bill Clinton,
national security terrorism and the military,
healthcare reform,
Harry S Truman,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (31)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What an Obama sycophant. The current president gets flak and this commentator goes into a rage. We have a sick, compromised media in this country.

Steve Jones of GA 3:12PM February 10, 2013

You are completely incorrect about the War Powers Act. It DEFINES War as putting armed forces into "hostilities" or where they would be imminent, and specifically says that the President may only do so from 1) Declaration of War, 2) Authorization by Act of Congress or 3) if we're attacked.

Yes, he may act alone if attacked, but it's not the threat of attack or imminent attack, it's IF ATTACKED.

The mistake you and many make about 48 hours notification 60 days fighting and 30 days withdrawal is what he is required to do AFTER sending forces in VIA ONE OF THE THREE INSTANCES STATED ABOVE.

It's Section 2(c). That's why Obama only said his reporting was "consistent" to the act.

The UN Participation Act of 1945 (a US law)allows a President to negotiate an agreement that MUST be authorized by Congress. If they call out forces via Article 42, he may act without their authorization PURSUANT TO an agreement that they've already authorized. He cannot, in any circumstance, send in the troops without Congress' Authorization, PERIOD. It's not well worded, but it's undeniable: he can only send them in without getting FURTHER approval from Congress IF HE ALREADY HAS THEIR AUTHORIZATION.

He is specifically in violation of both of these, and hence, the Constitution.

Ya know what? I'm a left-liberal Democrat; I just like the law. The more people allow addle-headed hearsay incorrectness to hold sway, the more we condone and enable trigger-happy Presidents. Look it up: I'm undeniably and clearly CORRECT about this, and you are WRONG.

Please have the decency to post a correction; if not, you're deliberately deceptive in a realm where lives are being spent.

Withheld of CA 9:35PM March 27, 2011

Nice language- is that the best you can do... why bother commenting at all. If you have nothing intelligent to write- how about not writing anything at all.

Dakota of NJ 10:55AM March 25, 2011

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall

Leslie Marshall is a nationally syndicated radio host heard nationwide weekdays from 7-10pm Eastern time on radio and streamed live at www.lesliemarshallshow.com. Leslie is also a Fox News contributor seen weekly on The O'Reilly Factor, America Live, monthly on Hannity and she sits in for Bob Beckel as one of the co hosts on The Five. She lives in Los Angeles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement