Colorado Could Become First State to Regulate & Tax Medical Marijuana

November 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Laura Chapin, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

DENVER—There was an old hippy saying in the '60s: "If the government figured out a way to tax it, marijuana would become legal." As of last week, Colorado has apparently crossed that Rubicon—at least for the prescribed version.

John Suthers, the state's Republican attorney general, issued an opinion on Nov. 16 that yes, the state of Colorado does have the authority to tax medical marijuana. The opinion was in response to a request for legal clarification from Colorado's Democratic Governor (and former Denver District Attorney) Bill Ritter. The governor's office hasn't indicated whether they support taxing medical marijuana, they simply wanted an official opinion on the state's authority to do so.

Still, Conservatives clapped their hands over a new revenue stream. Liberals are happy that people who are sick and need help will get it. And a cash-strapped state may have found a way to relieve a bit of its budget crunch.

Legally, though, it's still tangled. Between Colorado voters approving a constitutional amendment allowing medical use as an affirmative defense against pot possession, and the Obama Justice Department announcing they would not go out of their way to prosecute medical marijuana users, dispensaries have been popping up like...weeds. There are 50 dispensaries in Boulder County alone (at last count).

The growing, uncontrolled market has led to calls for regulation, so Colorado could soon become the first state in the nation to set up a regulated business model for medical marijuana. As patient Janice Beecher, who uses marijuana for osteoarthritis, said, "I am alarmed by the ease in which I obtained my permit and would love to see some defined laws set down that puts some controls on the whole process, as I am afraid that it's spiraling out of control."

State Sen. Chris Romer plans to introduce comprehensive medical marijuana legislation in the next Colorado General Assembly, which begins in January. And his co-sponsor on the House side is Rep. Tom Massey, a Republican from rural Colorado.

"I think it's a generational split, not a partisan one," says Romer.

Unlike California, which treats dispensaries as non-profit collectives, Romer is upfront about approaching medical marijuana as a business enterprise, with all the attendant regulations, licenses, and taxes. The state would levy a 2.9 percent sales tax on dispensaries, and Sen. Romer's bill might allow cities to levy an excise tax of up to 20 percent. Starting Dec. 1, medical marijuana dispensaries will be subject to a 3.62 percent city sales tax. It's estimated this could generate up to $15 million for the state and up to $45 million in city and community taxes.

"We want a regulated competitive market place (on medical marijuana)," Romer says. "We want to let people make money, we want to let the free market flow, and since Colorado is a local control state we want that local government control."

The dispensaries—unlike just about any other business on the planet—are eager to pay taxes as a way to legitimize their business. As one dispensary owner told the Denver Post, "We are in favor of taxation...We are in favor of seeing new regulation come in and clean this industry up."

Law enforcement remains skeptical on some of the details—for example, they're concerned about public safety in terms of what professions would allow people use medical marijuana and still go to work. Potential criminal involvement in the supply chain also gets their attention. And Romer's bill would largely leave it up to the state's Department of Regulatory Affairs to draw up the specific regulations

Still, if the legislation makes it into law, Colorado will cement its reputation as the state where libertarians and hippies collide. Or as Romer puts it, "Colorado is a state where you shouldn't touch our guns, our liquor, our water, or our weed."

Tags:
marijuana,
taxes,
Colorado

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The medicl argument is great. But i think we should start the argument at its base: IT'S MY BODY, I'LL DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT! Also, noone complains when oil companies come to their state and exploit thousands of acre of land and leave that way. Noone complains when strip mines dig deep into the earth and destroy that land, leaving major bodies of water polluted for the rest of time. Why is it that you complain about someone with the knowledge of growing pot coming to your town and sharing that knowledge. WAKE UP. Major corporations such as Walmart, Shell, Microsoft, Pepsi, Coca-Cola, and many many others, exploit your land and your people and you do nothing about it. Prescription pills such as Oxycontin, Prozac, Adderall, Hydrocodone and many others are very very accessibly by your children and noone says a word. We let our doctors put us on these pills and the children steal them and selkl them and abuse them and noone complains. But one word about marijuana, a drug that noone has ever overdosed on, and the public goes nuts. It makes me truly truly sick.

Nick Wilkie of PA 11:08AM April 15, 2011

If marijuana is really a medicine, it should be prescribed by licensed physicians and dispensed by licensed and trained pharmacists (a stringently regulated and highly trained profession).

Some people take Oxy recreationally. Does that mean there should be Oxy dispensaries in every other storefront downtown?

If current rules forbid pharmacies from dispensing marijuana, work to change that. Here in Colorado many of us are appalled by the instantaneous negative effects this change of law has had on our towns. Those who speak of money have it right. It has nothing to do with compassion or healing. It has to do with quick and dirty self-serving profit.

Rab of CO 10:19PM April 17, 2010

One question: If taxing on the State level occurs and you pay taxes to the State, doesn't that throw up the red flag on the Federal level? In other words, paying taxes on MM would be an admittance of guilt on the federal level, wouldn't it? To be clear, I am all for legalization on the Federal level and it COULD be the revenue stream the states and feds have been looking for. I am afraid if I claim taxes on sales then I am admitting to the Feds I am engaging in illegal activity in their eyes. Just curious about this.

Rob of CO 1:44PM March 18, 2010

Laura Chapin

Laura Chapin

Laura K. Chapin is a Democratic communications strategist based in Denver, Colorado, advocating for progressive causes and candidates in the Rocky Mountain West. She has previously worked for Gov. Bill Ritter and before escaping to God's Country, she spent 15 years (and way too many late nights Watching the Floor) in Washington, DC.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Mary Kate Cary

Politics 101 for the GOP

Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and the rest of the GOP pack are not so far apart.

Latest Video

advertisement