Gabrielle Giffords Shooting Coverage Becomes Media Navel Gazing

January 11, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The Tucson shootings, three days removed, have reached the predictable place in the story arc in which media analysis turns into a meta-narrative about the nature of the coverage rather than the event itself. The victims, intermittently remembered, first were props for an analysis of political rhetoric, then a playing field for accusations of partisan opportunism and, finally, now are an excuse for media navel-gazing.

The coverage and meta-discussion have laid bare this essential truth: There is no longer such a thing as “the mainstream media.” Republicans, having long ago created a shadow system to avoid so-called liberal media bias, now seem to long for adult supervision of the brave new media world. Gone is the paper of record or the news anchor everyone in America trusts to calm us down and tell us what to think. [Photo Gallery: Gabrielle Giffords Shooting in Arizona.]

David Brooks, in today’s New York Times, writes:

Mainstream news organizations linked the attack to an offensive target map issued by Sarah Palin’s political action committee. The Huffington Post erupted, with former Senator Gary Hart flatly stating that the killings were the result of angry political rhetoric. Keith Olbermann demanded a Palin repudiation and the founder of the Daily Kos wrote on Twitter: “Mission Accomplished, Sarah Palin.” Others argued that the killing was fostered by a political climate of hate.

Brooks is one of many conservatives bemoaning the coverage. George Will, predictably, claims New York Times bias, Marc Thiessen cites everyone from Daily Kos to the Times to The Nation. Rush Limbaugh, amusingly, laments about the “state-controlled media, the drive-by media.”

“Mainstream news organizations” behaved irresponsibly, yet Brooks's identified culprits are: a large blog, content-populated by hundreds of random unpaid contributors; a former ESPN host with a show on cable news; and a blogger sending out contemporaneous commentary in 145 characters. [Take the poll: Is Political Rhetoric To Blame for Arizona Shooting?]

And meanwhile, the leading Republican candidate for president responds to the tragedy first through a Facebook post and then via an E-mail filtered through Glenn Beck.

Most of the reporting on network TV and in the major newspapers and the major national magazines has been pretty measured and straightforward. And it’s a little late in the day for conservatives to complain about the interplay between partisan media and traditional media. But today’s reality is such that a news article in the Times and a 60 second piece on CBS barely register above the din of the blogosphere and the whine of right-wing talk radio.

No, the issue isn’t mainstream media bias. The real issue is that there is no mainstream media. The next time Rush or Thiessen (or Kos or Olbermann) want to complain about the mainstream, they should just look in the mirror.

Tags:
Rush Limbaugh,
New York Times,
Keith Olbermann,
George Will,
Glenn Beck,
media,
Twitter,
journalism,
Sarah Palin,
Facebook

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For Rush a 7 word quote. Most anybody can agree not likely in context. Just as liberals quoted Rush's famous quote wanting barry to fail out of context everytime I seen them quote him.

Another author here quoted a judge in shortened quote. A commenter was kind enough to provide full quote changing the meaning of judge quote. Making fool of author.

Such tactics harms TRUTH. Makes author and site intentionally dishonest.

I write comment here now because this article will surely be removed from front page tomorrow. Ths article deserves few comments...

Someone in Florida said Republican Governor should be shot. Liberals will not repeat that.

6 years prior to Palin’s cross hairs useage, Democrats used bullseye. Sarah’s cross hairs were obviously not gun scope cross hairs. Lines extend pass area thus not like scope…

Bill Hedges of MO 6:40PM January 12, 2011

Nobody seems to be commenting on this story. Since this is a story about meta-comments, regarding comments on the new news outlets, I guess this is a meta-meta-comment. I have made the first meta-meta-comment in history. Yay!

At what point does what I am saying become mental masturbation, though? But since that's a comment on my meta-meta comment, it's a meta-meta-meta comment. Yay, twice!

Okay, I'm done.

Jim Mooney of AZ 12:40AM January 12, 2011

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman was the winner of the Washington Post’s inaugural America’s Next Great Pundit competition. He is the executive vice president of public affairs at Teach for America and, writes on the Washington Post’s PostPartisan site and at www.offthehuff.org. He can be reached at Huffman.kevin@gmail.com, and you can follow him on Twitter @huffpundit.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement