Congress Passing a New 'No Child Left Behind' Is a No Brainer

January 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Education Secretary Arne Duncan kicked off the new year with an op-ed in the Washington Post today, calling for a bipartisan commitment to education reform. The Secretary wants Congress to pass a new version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“No Child Left Behind”), accurately noting that “few areas are more suited for bipartisan action than education reform.” Indeed, the administration’s legislative blueprint in this area runs right down the political center and would likely be supported broadly by voters.

And yet, conventional wisdom in education circles is that political forces will prevent Congressional action.

Here’s how the thinking goes: Republicans don’t want to hand the Obama administration a legislative win--particularly one that can be sold as a pragmatic, moderate accomplishment. Furthermore, on the right, the Tea Party will push a firmer states’ rights agenda that is anathema to broad federal regulation. And on the left, the beleaguered teachers’ unions will push hard against accountability standards rooted in student tests. [See editorial cartoons about the Tea Party.]

Indeed, if you want a snapshot of why moderate centrist legislation is so challenging today, just look at the online reader comments to Duncan’s piece. By the end of the rants, I wasn’t sure whether Duncan is a closet right-winger selling out the teachers and kids to corporate interests, or whether he is a big government socialist seeking to micro-manage your child’s daily life from Washington.

Education policy is a funny field, though, and I see a path to Secretary Duncan’s vision despite all the partisan bluster. First of all, the relevant committee chairs and ranking members (Tom Harkin and Michael Enzi in the Senate, John Kline and George Miller in the House) are experienced pros with a lot of common ground between them on public education issues. Each of them is more moderate than the most ardent special interest constituents in their parties. And since 2012 is a great unknown, each is well-positioned to sell compromise to the far right and the far left; there are huge risks in waiting for both parties.

With a clear centrist path, mutual disdain for the current No Child Left Behind mandates, and leadership from the administration, this should get done. At this point, the biggest barrier to success isn’t Congress--it’s our cynicism about Congress. If we assume and demand that Congress operates in the rational interests of the people, passing a new Elementary and Secondary Education Act is the ultimate no brainer.

Tags:
elementary school,
Arne Duncan,
Mike Enzi,
Tom Harkin,
John Kline,
George Miller,
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
No Child Left Behind,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

@ the junior from Oregon. Sorry I can't help myself...maybe you should learn how to conduct actual research before you publically announce your uneducated opinions and remind us all why the public school system is failing, even in Oregon. Not that I necessarily agree with the ‘I have a better plan’ comment but in light of yours: The Washington Post is not a valid source. You need to read and then site real research and lots of it. In the grown-up world, a pie-chart just doesn’t cut it. Also this particular pie chart is about the federal budget, go look at how much money states spend on education. In Arkansas the majority of the education is from local mils. More money on education is just like small classes, it doesn’t make a lick of difference on student achievement. And student achievement, that’s what matters. If you want to look at how much more money we’ve spent on education, you should make comparisons to 1980, when this newest wind of ed reform started. I’ll even let you find that 1980 pie graph yourself. But to help you with knowing what research you should read about spending and achievement, here are a few links:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2008/pdf/bg2179.pdf

http://www.parkergop.org/2010-06-RR07-EducationGrowth-BT-BW-BP-post.pdf

and a personal favorite

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8890.pdf

Now on a more positive note, kudos for the inspiration behind your obvious passion for civil justice and education!

Oh and Kevin I think your right on the money...

CBelin of AR 11:08PM August 16, 2011

Fist off, please do not write in all capital letters. It is construed as yelling and lessens the validity of your argument.

Second, the US Department of Education was created to, "promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access." (US Department of Education, http://www2.ed.gov/about/what-we-do.html). They do this by establishing funding policies, conducting research on American schools, and ensures continuity between the states (US Department of Education, http://www2.ed.gov/about/what-we-do.html). Furthermore, you stated, "Abolish the Department of Education and force its 5500 federal employees to find real jobs instead of poking their long noses into the states' educational programs." During this economy, can you so easily wish to lay off 5500 workers?

The problem of American public schools is not bureaucracy, it is a lack of funding. In fiscal year 2007, education received almost 100 billion dollars. Compared to almost 112 billion in 2006. National defense received 530 billion federal dollars, down 2 billion from 2006 (Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/interactives/budget07/category.html). The lack of funding is the problem, not having a department of education. And though private education excels in many ways, why should we assume that all American children want to go to a private school and why should we expect them to pay tuition to a private school? Government is designed to offer services, such as a good education, to the people that government serves. Government has not been doing a good job. As citizens and taxpayers, it is our Constitutional duty to get government back on track.

And, by the way, I am a Junior at Rex Putnam High School (a public school) near Milwaukie, Oregon.

Education Matters of OR 10:30AM January 05, 2011

Abolish the Department of Education and force its 5500 federal employees to find real jobs instead of poking their long noses into the states' educational programs.

Somehow, America managed to have a pretty fair educational system before our worst president (Obama is a contender for the title), Jimmy Carter, decided we needed to create a Department of Education in 1980.

Nothing good ever comes from adding more bureaucrats, regulations and bureaucracy. Do we really need redundant levels of bureaucratic meddling at national, state, county and city levels? Private education seems to do better without so may pencil pushers and busy bodies.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:28PM January 04, 2011

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman was the winner of the Washington Post’s inaugural America’s Next Great Pundit competition. He is the executive vice president of public affairs at Teach for America and, writes on the Washington Post’s PostPartisan site and at www.offthehuff.org. He can be reached at Huffman.kevin@gmail.com, and you can follow him on Twitter @huffpundit.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement