Why Did Obama Weigh In On Michael Vick?

December 28, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (23)

Peter King, the country’s preeminent pro football writer, reported yesterday that President Obama called Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie to weigh in on the comeback of quarterback Michael Vick. King wrote:

"The president wanted to talk about two things, but the first was Michael,'' Lurie told me. "He said, 'So many people who serve time never get a fair second chance. He was ... passionate about it. He said it's never a level playing field for prisoners when they get out of jail. And he was happy that we did something on such a national stage that showed our faith in giving someone a second chance after such a major downfall."

I voted for the president, and I have enjoyed watching Vick tear up the NFL this season. I’m rooting for Vick to make a clean comeback. But with all due respect, Mr. President, what were you thinking?

First, let’s start with the substance. Is Michael Vick the right example of “ex-con given a second chance”? The former number one draft pick with all-world talent? Would the Eagles have been lining up to give a second chance to an ex-con backup tight end or a long snapper with a felony record? Surely the president doesn’t think that Vick’s ability to throw the football and outrun defensive ends is going to create a hiring renaissance for the average ex-con in America. The Eagles made a football bet on Michael Vick, not a policy bet, and the bet paid off. So far.

[See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

But second, on the politics, what is the possible upside here? Barack Obama doesn’t know Michael Vick any better than I do. Is Michael Vick going to stay clean? Has he completely turned his life around? I hope so, and it’s a great story if he does, but I wouldn’t bet my reputation on it.

To wit, S.L. Price wrote an in-depth Sports Illustrated cover story earlier this year about Vick and his messy, meandering path back to polite society. Price covered Vick’s partying during the last off-season, culminating in his inexplicably stupid decision to have an open-to-the-public 30th birthday party in which Vick’s codefendant from his criminal case showed up and took a bullet in the leg (Vick was not involved in the shooting). That was in June. As in six months ago.

Every now and again, the president dives into a thorny social issue with no possible upside. He did it after the arrest of Henry Louis Gates Jr., resulting in a bunch of political sidestepping and re-explaining and backtracking, and eventually the laughable “beer summit.” But at least then, he actually knew Gates and could vouch for his character.

Michael Vick? I wouldn’t vouch for much more than his scrambling ability, particularly if I were facing a tough re-election fight.

Tags:
Michael Vick,
politics,
NFL,
Barack Obama,
sports

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you had done something wrong wouldnt you want someone to forgive you? And people do change I dont care what anyone else thinks. I've known totall jerks and then something happens in their life and completely turns them around and they came and asked for forgiveness. I know what Michael did in the past was wrong but I feel like when someone does something wrong and they are sincerly sorry and I dont give them a second chance, that means I dont deserve a second chance when I do something wrong. So if you dont give Michael Vick that second chance why should anyone have reason to give you a second chance since you are so sure that he doesnt deserve one. And think of a time you did something that you regretted and you shouldnt have gotten a second chance and you did anyway. Thats the position Michael is in right now.

John of IA 9:37AM January 11, 2011

How dare any of you run off at the mouth about anyone else. You can calmly agree or disagree about the author of this editorial. You can agree or disagree with what the President of the United States or anyone else does. But how dare any of you ridicule and trash and degrade anyone else!

You would not be brave enough to do that if you were standing in front of that person and all the other witnesses. You hide behind the anonymity of the internet to spew your garbage. You are as full of fear as you are vain.

Grow up and speak/write with courtesy, or Shut up!

KenBob of SC 12:00AM December 31, 2010

So this Wash Post writer gets the FOX talking points and is auditioning for a job with Fox, who pays well for generating such malicious partisan garbage like this.

Some people are going to criticize the president for anything the president says, and this writer figures out there are partisan billionaires who pay well for bogus rants like Huffman's. Turns out these billionaires are paying conservative trolls to continually write absurdities on blogs like this.

Its legal to kill dogs that chase livestock or game here, so killing dogs is no sacred injustice in this country. While I don't condone dog fighting that Vick was busted for, there are too many people with violent dogs like pit bulls raising them to be vicious like just another weapon.

For Fox's Tucker Carlson to call for Vick's execution goes way beyond some team enthusiasm and such partisan calls for murder borders on terrorism. Anyone echoing of this absurd attack on Micheal Vick is part of the fascist movement here in the US to would have the moneyed minority trying to rule by threat, lies and absurd propaganda like this story targeting Vick.

Hank of MT 12:59PM December 30, 2010

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman

Kevin Huffman was the winner of the Washington Post’s inaugural America’s Next Great Pundit competition. He is the executive vice president of public affairs at Teach for America and, writes on the Washington Post’s PostPartisan site and at www.offthehuff.org. He can be reached at Huffman.kevin@gmail.com, and you can follow him on Twitter @huffpundit.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement