Healthcare Ruling Could Lead to Public Option

December 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print

President Obama's foes may be gleeful this afternoon, now that federal District Court Judge Henry Hudson has ruled that the federal government cannot require individual Americans to purchase health insurance policies from private insurance companies.

In the short run, the White House has apparently lost a skirmish. In the long run, it's conservatives who may have suffered the more grievous wound. Hudson's ruling, if upheld by the Supreme Court, may pave the way for an even more "socialistic" kind of healthcare system.

Say what you want about Obamacare, this much is undeniable: the Democrats chose to work with existing stake holders - like doctors and industry and drug firms and insurance companies - to improve the current healthcare system, based as it is on private insurance.

[Read more about healthcare reform.]

But if the conservative majority on the Supreme Court sides with Hudson, that may change. The tens of millions of sick Americans without insurance will not be turned away at hospital doors, and kicked out to the gutter to die. They will get treated, in very expensive circumstances, and the costs of their treatment will be passed along to you and me. Our insurance premiums will climb, as we pay for the free riders, and in time more and more of us will be joining the ranks of the uninsured, and/or paying higher taxes to the state and federal governments to cover soaring healthcare costs.

At some point, the idea of a public option - opening government health programs like Medicaid, Medicare or the Veteran's Administration to all Americans - will gain political traction. After all, reformers will argue, we tried to be reasonable and work within the system, but judges like Henry Hudson would not let us.

Tags:
healthcare reform,
Congress,
democratic party

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There is still no cure for aids.

Ruddy Duck of KY 7:31PM December 14, 2010

You have not disproved any of my comments. I will mostly ASSUME, YOU DO KNOW WHAT THAT WORD MEANS, EVERY WORD CONTAING TO HEALTH FIELD IS TRUE expect for a little.

Life expectancy has many factors other than health care. So what’s your point ? Few die in child birth here if woman had prenatal care, led clean life, and followed Doctors orders. Many in Russia lived long life with little if any health care. Life was conducive to long life.

You will have to prove “worse result”, Not going to swallow that one. You do know how to research ? What was the standards used to determine. Cetaintly in areas one Country may do better than others.

I feel not sorry for those who are not responsible for their family necessities. Next to roof over their heads and food in their belly comes health insurance. Not buying a house, vacation, material things such a car. A well planned life has the money to buy it.

As far as lowering cost a health plan by Republicans has been on internet a long time. Medicare and CBO has determined obamacare does not reduce cost. Children plans being dropped in CA and other States because of obamacare new regulations. If obamacare was all that why the 4+ year wait for full obamacare ? Shame on barry, Republican plan would be in effect fully long ago by now. Aren’t Children dying and families going broke because of the wait ? Polls against obamacare and then there was Nov. 2.

Restriction of care and expensive medicine denied in most of socialized health Countries because of cost overruns. Including in our own Country, WY.

You are the Ostrich…

Bill Hedges of MO 6:20PM December 14, 2010

To set the record straight, we do not have a health care system in the U.S. There are individual systems out there like the Department of Defense or the Veterans Health Care System. But not one system that covers everyone. For the unlucky, not part of the Department of Defense or Veterans Health Care Systems, it's a mess.

J. Trim of CA 2:17PM December 14, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement