GOP Abandons No Tax Hike Pledge

December 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

December, 2010 may go down in history as the moment when both of America's great political parties blinked.

The great stare-down over taxes and spending began in the Reagan years, when conservatives ditched their long-time preference for balanced budgets and let loose a tide of red ink. It was more than just a necessary juicing of the economy.

There was a generation of conservative ideologues who believed that they could stop the expansion of government by "starving the beast." Hold the line on tax cuts, the conservatives said, and you could throttle the liberal welfare state. Cut taxes. Win now. Ignore short-term debt. In the famous words of Dick Cheney, "Deficits don't matter."

[Read more about the deficit and national debt.]

The Republicans underestimated their Democratic foes. They expected that the liberal goody-two-shoes could be shamed into proper behavior. The Right embraced a fantasy that there was some level of debt with which the good government types on the Left could not abide. But liberals had learned from the Republican cynicism. They watched Republican Congresses and presidents cut taxes AND raise spending, and heard the voters applaud. And when the Democrats got their hands on the levers of power, they set out to beat the Republicans at the game. The Democrats started "feeding the beast," betting that the Republicans would ultimately have to concede, and raise taxes.

[Read 10 Things You Didn't Know About the Bush Tax Cuts.]

So the game of chicken went on. For twenty years. Until we are in the spot we're in.

And then came December when, lo and behold, both sides blinked. Democrats voted to make huge cuts in spending and Republicans voted for big tax hikes.

Don't hyper-ventilate. The blinking has not taken place in Congress yet, only in the final acts of a presidential commission on fiscal sanity led by Republican Alan Simpson and Democrat Erskine Bowles. And its actions were overshadowed by the news that President Obama had agreed with congressional Republicans on a mighty tax and stimulus deal, which would add another $900 billion or so to the federal debt. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

But liberals like Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Democratic whip (and Obama's former seatmate) joined with conservative Republicans like Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn and Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo to urge us to retreat from the brink. Coburn's vote, in particular, stands out. He is a sincere public servant, and a dedicated conservative who has great credibility with the grassroots. He and Crapo showed great political courage when endorsing the commission plan.

The bottom line: for the first time in twenty years, the Republican "pledge" to oppose all tax hikes has been ditched by conservative leaders, in high-profile positions.

Even more interesting: as of this morning, their political careers seem not to have unduly suffered.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I thought conservatives were worried about the deficits? I guess that was just the usual election gibberish. now that the election is over it's business as usual. And to think, they have been getting away with this for over half a century. Most of their base are so illiterate they don't even notice. I have talked to some recently who weren't even aware the US recently went thru an economic crisis . Some are so stupid they are still running around worrying about Obama's birth certificate. Their cult of stupidity is destroying the US.

Oak of CO 3:18PM December 14, 2010

Tree Hugger of CO

Maybe when barry stops blaming Bush for Clinton’s recession will I stop comparing JFK. Does it get under you skin that Democrat and Country’s ICON knew reducing taxes for rich increase government revenue. It worked for John Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton (thanks to Contract With America), and G.W. Bush.

Increased government revenue by reducing rich’s tax. How did that cause recession. You are in liberal nut denial. Wall Street failed holding all that bad home loan mortgages. You do remember that with your liberal selective memory.

Why did you fail to mention tax cuts to rich increase government revenue ? Can’t face facts. I quote all the time CBO. Your problems with Heritage is that it is not to liberal liking. You complain but give NO EVIDENCE Your barry misquoted Heritage. Yes, barry used Heritage as source. Good enough for him to use, why shouldn’t I. Point is, I will quote them as source. But whine like barry all you want.

Country present recession begun with housing mess that Jimmy Carter began and Bill Clinton & lawyer barry with Acorn pushed over the edge.

Bill Hedges of MO 11:53AM December 14, 2010

Truly, can't you stop living in the past? The times of Kennedy are not the times of today. He lowered the tax rate to 70% for the wealthy; whereas, today, the rich pay without their lawyers and loopholes 35%. At 70% things worked great, today with the Bush/Cheney tax cuts, this country is floundering. Something you are too stupid to get through your head, but then you are from MO. You keep quoting the Heritage Foundation and keep spewing their views to the determent of the country. After all, they are only out for the rich, not the average/poor Joes of the country.

Tree Hugger of CO 9:53AM December 14, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Latest Videos

advertisement