Cutting Through the Fog on Global Warming

December 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

Lonnie Thompson was born in West Virginia. He went to college at Marshall University, and did his post-graduate work at Ohio State, which employs him now. He and his research team look properly Midwestern--like the folks you would meet in a Lutheran church choir, or at the local Rotary.

Which is to say that Lonnie Thompson is not a member of the evil Elite. He is merely a top notch American scientist who happens to spend more of his time at higher altitudes than his fellow human beings, excepting perhaps some Nepalese sherpas.

Thompson’s specialty is ice. He and his team hike to remote parts of the globe, often toting heavy gear to places where the air is too thin to use helicopters, and drill down into glaciers and ice caps to collect frozen samples of ancient atmospheres. Then they analyze this very, very old air to see what it can tell us about global warming.

I bring Thompson’s name up because, with the climate summit in the news, the big energy companies and their political toadies will be juicing up their public relations campaign to assure us all that global warming is no big deal.

[Read more about energy policy and climate change.]

Thompson believes that it is a big deal. And his views on the subject are worth considering. They are based on the facts he has gathered, at much risk to himself and his team, and presented in a lovely article that I urge all to read.

Because one side is slick and well-funded, and the other often represented by tongue-tied wonks who don’t do much traveling outside scientific circles, the “debate” over global warming can at times be confusing. Thompson cuts through the fog.

(And thanks to Andrew Revkin for calling it to my attention.)

 

Tags:
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As far as cutting through the fog on global warming (actually climate change, to be more accurate) goes, I've found it helpful to read what Sen Jim Imhofe (D, OK) has to say. As a rule, anything he has to say on the subject is at best slanted, at worst a complete fabrication. Saves lots of time.

I wish both sides of this argument would drop the "global warming" tag, as that causes people blanketed in record snowfalls to question the science. What happens, to simplify, is that anytime you pump more energy into a dynamic system, the extremes (heat, cold, drought, precipitation) become more extreme and more frequent.

Rich of OK 11:45AM December 14, 2010

Global change, probably--what's scary is something in the Discover magazine's current issue about the flood of tropical diseases that are creeping ever northward. They are spread by mosquitos and other insects, and most of the diseases are poorly understood. Many of the sicknesses had been controlled with the use of DDT on the insects but have rebounded and mutated. Ask anyone who's had dengue fever. It's known as "break bone fever" for the way its victims suffer.

Jill of CA 6:00PM December 10, 2010

The problem is that CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropologic Global Warming) proponents have tons of facts in which to lead people to the conclusion they want. More telling, however, is what they leave out of their presentations. Just like the "ban DHMO" website proves: a collection of facts does not necessarily convey truth. Yes, CO2 is a GHG. Yes, GHG's warm the planet. Yes, humans emit CO2. Yes, Humans impact global warming. But is that the WHOLE story. No. This is where the skeptics run into trouble; try countering "ban DHMO" without using the word "water" (Friends of DHMO). Unfortunately we "evil skeptics" of Catastrophic Anthropological Global Warming can't just say "it's just CO2" like someone countering "ban DHMO" could say “it’s just water”. CO2 just doesn't have a common name that everyone recognizes as being essential to life.

John W of NC 12:10PM December 10, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement