Will Sarah Palin's TARP Flip Flop Haunt Her in 2012?

November 16, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

I just finished reading Too Big to Fail, the best-selling account by Andrew Ross Sorkin of the economic crisis of 2008.

Sorkin’s book confirmed what I thought I remembered from those turbulent days: that the Republican administration of George W. Bush, led by a Republican secretary of the treasury, Henry Paulson, and Ben Bernanke, a Republican chairman of the Federal Reserve, conspired (in a good way) to steer a group of greedy and foolish and mostly-Republican Wall Street bankers to something like a safe landing.

It was not a pretty or coherent process. Bear Stearns and AIG got bailed out. Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. Our 401(k)’s cratered. And the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), while saving America from another Great Depression, proved hideously unpopular when voters discovered that those same greedy Wall Street executives were still reaping humongous bonuses.

Which leaves me to marvel at what happened this fall, when the Republican Party pulled off the stunning trick of using millions of dollars in donations from those very same Wall Street pirates to finance campaigns that blamed the Democrats for TARP, thus installing a Republican House of Representatives that seems bent on easing the new federal regulations that are supposed to prevent another catastrophic financial crisis and bailouts.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the 2010 campaigns.]

Putting the gross dishonesty of the Republican tactics aside, I have to give them credit for chutzpah, and marvel at the Democratic Party’s ineptitude. All the more so, in that this is not the first time that something like this has happened.

In 2002, the Democrats in Congress decided that a new cabinet agency--the Department of Homeland Security--was needed to protect Americans from terrorist attacks. Bush and the Republicans opposed the notion as wasteful, until the bill got mired in the Democratic Senate by a squabble over how to treat the unionized federal work force. The Republicans then spun 180 degrees, embraced the department as an essential component of the War on Terror, and lambasted the Democrats for placing lazy federal bureaucrats above our security. It was, said a marveling Bill Clinton at the time, one of the most outrageous political tricks he ever witnessed. And Slick Willie knows his politics.

[Read more about the military and terrorism.]

Which brings us to the 2012 presidential campaign, and the ongoing efforts of the Republican Party’s potential candidates to appease the Tea Party types, in several cases by trying to rewrite history. I speak not just of Mitt Romney (whose repeated endorsement of a government mandate to force citizens to buy health insurance is documented on a very funny YouTube clip) but of the darling herself, Sarah Palin.

As Sorkin’s book reminds us, the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates had a choice to make in the fall of 2008. They could support Bush and Paulson and Bernanke during the crisis, or go rogue and score some cheap political points. To their great credit, John McCain and Sarah Palin joined Barack Obama and Joe Biden and supported the president at this moment of national peril. Palin--who would resign as governor of Alaska in midterm because it didn’t suit her lifestyle--didn’t protest or step down from the ticket over TARP. Indeed, when looking back at the 2008 campaign in her book Going Rogue, Palin criticized those House Republicans who balked at TARP and the other rescue measures.

[See where McCain gets his campaign money.]

Yet when TARP became political poison, and helped to inspire the Tea Party movement, Palin was more than willing to join the other Republicans in the 2010 campaign in the game of being for TARP at its inception, and flagrantly trying to rewrite history when the opportunity required. She had the gall even to rant on Facebook about the “too big to fail” mentality, and to complain about the influence of Goldman Sachs on President Obama when it was Paulson, of course, who went straight to Bush’s cabinet from a job as CEO of Goldman Sachs, and Bush’s White House chief of staff, Joshua Bolton, who was another Goldman Sachs alumnus.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on Goldman Sachs.]

In 2010, Sarah and the Republicans got away with being for TARP before they were against it. The Democrats will no doubt fail at calling attention to this hypocrisy in 2012, as they failed this fall. But maybe Romney, who is always under fire for his own flip-flops, will remind GOP voters of Palin’s TARP somersaults. Or maybe Palin’s fans are so blinded that it won’t make a difference.

Tags:
Lehman Brothers,
Bear Stearns,
recession,
Troubled Assets Relief Program,
Tea Party,
AIG, Inc.,
Henry Paulson,
Wall Street,
Congress,
2010 Congressional elections,
2008 presidential election,
John McCain,
George W. Bush,
Department of Homeland Security,
bailout,
national security terrorism and the military,
economy,
Goldman Sachs,
Bill Clinton,
2012 presidential election,
Ben Bernanke,
unemployment,
Sarah Palin,
Democratic Party,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Aside from the fact that the cbs interviews from 2008 will probably be played on an endless loop in liberal ads if she wins the primaries, her flip-flop on TARP, and her constant use of the words "communist" and "socialist" and a whole slew of other things, Palin really has a horrible approval rating.

Last I checked it was hovering at around 15%, worse than Michael Jackson AND O.J. Simpson on trial.

Left-Wing Junkie of VA 9:14PM November 18, 2010

Uh.. Heh heh! You know if you take the word (please don't tell him it's an acronym) "TARP" and you re-arrange the "P" and the "T" and then erase the curvidy part of the letter "P" it spells a funny word! Ha ha, heh heh! And so, like... Obama is super smart and cool and all the democrats make my leg all tingly feeling. Then I have to go change my underoos.

Aloyisious Ferret of MA 8:36PM November 16, 2010

...besides, women do not like "worry wrinkles"! A pun perhaps, but there is some level of truth here. Sarah quit the governorship of Alaska, probably to top the list, for family considerations.

She truly is having fun touring the country and making millions knocking the liberals around. So, why would she want to become POTUS (making a few billion while a few "million" will do nicely) when she has re-established her family position as matriarch?

Run for POTUS in 2012? ...don't think so! She continues to get the goat of the liberals every day and it's funny as h--l!

...besides, she's cuter 'n a new puppy!

Danny of MA 5:59PM November 16, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Latest Videos

advertisement