2010 Elections Could Have Been Worse for Obama, Democrats

November 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print

It could have been worse for the Democrats. Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer and Harry Reid might have lost. The Senate could have followed the House.

[See where Reid gets his campaign money.]

It could have been worse for the country. The silliest of the Tea Party types might have won. We can survive, probably, with Rand Paul and Marco Rubio.

But like Bill Clinton and George W. Bush before him, Barack Obama has now lost the House on his watch. And by such a large margin that, most likely, it will take some years before the Democrats get it back.

The Democrats welcomed a few new stars--it won’t be long before Colorado Governor-elect John Hickenlooper and Senator-elect Joe Manchin of West Virginia make themselves known around the country.

And there is a certain grandness to the liberal defeat. When they ran in 2008, the Democrats made no secret about what they would do when it came to tax policy, healthcare reform, green energy, a crackdown on Wall Street, and making college affordable. And once they were elected, they went out and did it. The Democrats lost the political argument, but let’s see the Republican majority keep its promises so well.

How will the Republicans create jobs for Americans with timid little chips at discretionary spending? How will they tame Medicare while keeping all those seniors who voted for them happy? How will they reduce the debt with big tax cuts for the wealthy?

At least Senator-elect Rand Paul of Kentucky was honest last night. We all work for the rich, he told a television interviewer, so deal with it. If we cut their taxes there may be jobs building their yachts.

Volatility remains the key word in post-Reagan American politics. Since Ronnie left for California, the House has flipped, re-flipped, and flipped again.

The economy is the only reliable predictor. It dipped under a one-term Republican president, soared under a two-term Democrat, and crashed under a two-term Republican whose economic legacy left his party in shambles. And now last night. If they want to keep the Senate and the White House, the Democrats will need signs of a return to prosperity by 2012. The clock keeps ticking.

Tags:
unemployment,
Harry Reid,
Congressional elections 2008,
Barbara Boxer,
Rand Paul,
2010 election,
deficit and national debt,
Marco Rubio,
Joe Manchin,
healthcare reform,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
economy,
Medicare,
democratic party,
politics,
George W. Bush,
taxes,
healthcare,
Bill Clinton,
republican party,
Tea Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (24)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

John Aloysous Farrell is grasping at straws.

First let's deal with John manchin as a future "star." As WHAT? As what the hard core Democ-rats call a DINO? Wait until he votes with Republicans as he promised to do in the big stuff--Crap and Tax as well as repeal of Obamacare. let's see how much of a "star' he'll be then.

This election resulted in a large Republican bench. WE have the stars. Our new congressmen, Alan West especially. Our new governors, especially John Kasich.

I suppose our new governors in Nevada and New Mexico and Senator Marco Rubio will be called "inauthentically" Hispanic and the same will be said of our new African American congressmen because they were not, like Loretta Sanchez and Maxine Waters, elected from Bantustan districts drawn by map makers to elect the lowest common denominators of thos communities. Indeed, Alan West was elected from a district drawn to KEEP OUT African-Americans.

Mr. Farrell might want to get a grip on reality.

David S. Levine of FL 11:13PM November 04, 2010

The debt clock just keeps ticking, and we continue to invent entitlement programs that just accelerate that clock. Conceptually it is nice to say that we provide low cost high quality medical care for everyone, but the nagging question still remains, "Who is going to pay for all this?" I have never heard a competent Progressive (that may be an oxymoron) give a satisfactory answer to that question. We are all just whistling by the graveyard.

Getting Redder in MI of MI 9:21PM November 04, 2010

The Seniors were scared because of lies perpetrated on all Americans by the Republican leaders as well as Fox with pseudo party leaders. I would like to know what benefits that are in the Health care bill that the beneficiarys do not like.I would bet there is not one that isnt liked because they just didnt take the time to understand . They just believed the liars and power hungry idiots.

WH of WI 2:38PM November 04, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement