Tea Party Republicans Should Drop Their Andy Griffith Fantasies

October 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

Conservative scholar Charles Murray’s article in the Sunday newspaper, about how “the new elite” is out of touch with “mainstream” America, was silly and ultimately rather sad. But it illustrates the fix that the Republican Party is in.

All the energy on the right is coming from the Tea Party Republicans, which leaves conservative scholars and commentators in an uncomfortable position. To stake a role in the latest “revolution” they have to embrace some pretty stupid stuff, and attack the true American values like hard work, making money, buying a house in the suburbs, and getting your kids a good education.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the Tea Party.]

With its sanctification of slothful behavior and woolly thinking--one of Murray’s leading qualifications for being in the American “mainstream” appears to be an appetite for daytime television (bringing to mind Ross Perot’s wonderful quip that he never listened to talk radio because he worked for a living)--the essay must surely have the Chinese, Indians, Brazilians, and Russians giggling.

It is bad to study for your SATs or grad school exams, Murray informs us. Educational success will put you among the hated elite, “isolated from mainstream America and ignorant about the lives of ordinary Americans.” The worst thing you can do is buy a home in a California or New Jersey suburb, or take a job in a high-tech mecca like Austin, Texas, or Silicon Valley or the North Carolina research triangle. And then, God forbid, you’ll no doubt stress the need for a good education at home and force your kids to go to college, and go backpacking on weekends in the national parks.

What is truly American, says Murray (and I am not making this up), is knowing who replaced Bob Barker as the host of The Price Is Right.

I will give this to Murray. He lumps the neoconservatives at the American Enterprise Institute, the rightward-leaning writers at the Weekly Standard, the wealthy Republican suburbs, and the economic libertarians and entrepreneurs of the American financial class into the dreaded meritocracy.

“The bubble that encases the New Elite crosses ideological lines,” he says. “They are … isolated and ignorant. The members of the New Elite may love America, but, increasingly, they are not of it.”

[Read Susan Milligan: The Tea Party's 'Real America' Is a Fantasy]

Well, you have probably already gotten to where I am getting. America is a largely urban and suburban country. If you count all the city dwellers, suburbanites, people who watch HBO, financiers, doctors and nurses, skiers, Western backpackers and mountain bikers, teachers, high-tech workers, folks who live on the coasts, scientists, Weekly Standard writers and educated Southerners, and Midwesterners and Westerners as dwellers of “the bubble of privilege” you are shoving about two thirds of Americans (by Murray’s own math) out of the “mainstream.”

It’s the Tea Party types who are out of the “mainstream,” if there is such a thing. Not the rest of us.

Nostalgia is, by definition, sweet. But it’s time for conservatives to drop their Andy Griffith fantasies. They were fun in the 1950s, when China and India and Japan and Germany and Brazil were not our vigorous economic competition. Now they are merely destructive.

The American “mainstream” is not, and better not be, Mayberry. It had better include science and math and ambition and economic literacy and higher education. Or we will all be watching daytime TV.

Tags:
Germany,
Tea Party,
China,
education,
Brazil,
Republican Party,
Japan

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dear Mr. Cum Laude;

re: Even polls taken by liberal news outlets show that tea party people are better educated, etc. than the voting public as a whole

It's interesting though, despite your Cum Laude that you've failed to link or reference any citations for this patently false claim.

The disingenuity of the radical right (er, I mean the "tea party") not withstanding this is a particular bald-faced lie. Reminds me of a dinner I suffered through recently with a 'tea partier' who claimed he wrote a thesis two years ago on Obama care for his grad program. Piece of cake with all the peer-reviewed material available on a non-existant piece of legislation... However it is very typical of the radical right (tea partier) mentality. Not one I have yet met knows a thing about the legislation or content, but somehow because Rush Limbaugh or Sara Palin or some other corporate mercenary has told them it's bad, they are persistant in believing it is "evil" even though it has an entire host of benefits to persons just like themselves.

The author's point on India and Russia who DO Have their national priorities straight on creating jobs and what it takes to do so are laughing giddily at the stupidity of Americans for once again pandering to the interests and fear-mongering of the REAL elite of the nation - the John and Cindy McCain's , the Bush heirs, Walmart heirs, et al, - none of whom are Democrats.

EdRoscoe of KY 2:03PM November 03, 2010

<<Nostalgia is, by definition, sweet. But it’s time for conservatives to drop their Andy Griffith fantasies. They were fun in the 1950s, when China and India and Japan and Germany and Brazil were not our vigorous economic competition. Now they are merely destructive.

The American “mainstream” is not, and better not be, Mayberry. It had better include science and math and ambition and economic literacy and higher education. Or we will all be watching daytime TV.>>

Standing ovation. Expect it to be lost on the venals of the radical right ...er, I mean the "tea party". The point is far too glaringly obvious for those who DO watch the news, actually understand economic indicators, and care what happens to our kids.

CarWill of KY 1:54PM November 03, 2010

Unfortunately for him, he only proves what Mr. Murray said. For instance:

Murray--"Get into a conversation about television with members of the New Elite, and they can probably talk about a few trendy shows--"Mad Men" now, "The Sopranos" a few years ago. But they haven't any idea who replaced Bob Barker on "The Price Is Right." They know who Oprah is, but they've never watched one of her shows from beginning to end."

Farrel--"With its sanctification of slothful behavior and woolly thinking--one of Murray’s leading qualifications for being in the American “mainstream” appears to be an appetite for daytime television...."

Anyone with half a brain can see that Murray is using a few generic examples (and I only picked part of one paragraph) to describe how everyday people differ from the "Elite". And any TV ad sales exec can show you the figures to prove it.

The sad part is that Farrel actually knows this. One of the defenses in debate--when you don't have facts to make your point--is to point fingers at the opposing team instead. Aggravatingly, this is the one talent that Democrats and Republicans share. That's why Tea-Partiers want them ALL thrown out and a whole new group ushered in.

You will find the label of Democrat or Republican is unimportant to Tea-Partiers. We will gladly elect Democrats just as quickly as Republicans as long as they have experienced first-hand what the rest of us have experienced: personal job-loss accompanied by increasing personal debt and real health battles (not ones you search for just to create sound-bites); the consequences of reduced accountability in politicians as well as our own responsibility for not holding our children accountable for their actions and instead trying to take away all the pain they have caused themselves and their families (rampant sexual promiscuity at earlier ages, abortions on demand to hide it from the rest of the family as well as the males who participated, defending them against the "mean-spirited teachers" who want them to pull up their pants or cover up their bras and shut their sweet little faces and do their school work on time); and let's not forget the wonderful marketers who promise us everything we could wish for with "buy now and pay later." And boy do we pay! (Just a few examples, Mr. Farrel)

When a pastor takes an offering on Sunday morning it's perfectly natural; when one televangelist after another begs for money hour after hour on religious TV it's beyond ludicrous! By the same token, when one or two TV shows or movies or music artists or even journalists sprays everyone with raunchy graphic sex or scenes of beyond-hateful bloodlust or lyrics of brutal rape and murder or blatant hypocrisy and bigotry while saying it's the other side doing it, it's perfectly natural--unfortunately--in a society built on freedom of speech. But when almost all new TV shows, movies, songs, and journalists are guilty of this....THIS is where the Tea-Partiers want to see change!

Kenny of SC 12:33AM October 29, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement