There's Water on the Moon, Believe It or Not

October 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

The morning papers tell a nifty tale about American science and ingenuity which, though it fails to impress the Tea Party Republicans, continues to set a standard for the world.

A year ago, NASA sent a rocket crashing into the moon. Right behind it was a second spacecraft, collecting data as it passed through the plume of debris. The results have now been analyzed and made public. They show that Earth’s lovely satellite has plentiful stores of water and ice: the elements needed to use the moon as a base for planetary exploration.

Many Americans no doubt feel pride at what NASA accomplished. Technical accomplishment and scientific progress are longstanding American values.

But others prefer to live in a world of superstition, suspicion, and resentment. They want to believe in biblical fables, and not evolutionary science. They scorn scientists and doctors and other well-educated folks as “elites.”

And in their ignorance, many are manipulated by greedy industrialists and energy companies, and their lackeys in the media, to obstruct proposed solutions to global warming.

Well, those smart guys and gals that devised and executed that clever rocket probe to the moon, and their peers in U.S. science, are the very same ones who tell us that our climate is being changed by human behavior. We depend on them every day for high-tech advances that grow our economy, the sophisticated weapons that equip our troops, cures for disease, and the research that boosts yields on our farms.

But by all means, feel free not to believe them. Heck, there are lots of folks who still think that the Apollo moon landings were staged on a Hollywood back lot, or that dinosaurs and humans roamed the earth together. Thinking is hard; it’s so much easier just to feel.

 

Tags:
Tea Party,
economy,
energy policy and climate change,
Republican Party,
NASA,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Crotchety ? I like that. I rather write a novel here, but if some liberal wants to wrestle in the mud I’m there to. God is a revengeful God, as a man so am I. I could tear up bad doers in church or destroy cities for ungodliness.

My personal belief in God is just that. I feel the wind and know it exist.

Big bang is but a theory. A try to justify what exist. No proof. I can give CBO report that Bush tax cuts for top 40% of wage earners increased government revenue, not decrease.

I fault nobody bringing in their personal religious beliefs here. Is their right. Someone like Steve of IL may ridicule. Many hiding behind unknown identity has no scruples.

You are certainly right there are issue such as sports. Then science is political. Global warning gets into our pocketbook and government bills. Same for social/moral issues, the military, economics etc. Congress deals with these issues.

Yes Congress deals with religion. Such as taxing church owned lands, other than the church building. What Congress should not deal with is theory of big bang and which God is true God, etc.

I may have been wrong for my earlier comment. I sincerely apology. No bad intentions on my part was meant.

I rarely write you. We here rarely write people of similar beliefs. Glad to do so now…

Bill Hedges of MO 2:47PM October 26, 2010

You know Bill, I enjoy reading your opinions I find you often crotchety, your style unique, but nevertheless interesting - usually.

However, you're mistaken in your comment to Mark, and by innuendo, to me.

First, this is not completely a political site. There are often blogs about sports, science, social/moral issues, the military, economics etc..

I also make the observation that Christ and Mohamed were quite involved in the politics of their time.

Furthermore, it is apparent that Mr. Farrell wrote this column/blog with the intent to illustrate the intermixing of religion, science and politics.

Finally Bill, how would you go about dissecting values, morals, character and objective truth from the political conversation?. And, if you were able to do so, then wouldn't "politics" would be devoid of humanity? So in that case, what point does "politics" serve?

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:03PM October 26, 2010

Mr. Farrell fails to understand the incredible complexity of life arising on its own without an outside agent guiding through the required steps. Cookies are very simple in comparison to single cell organisms. Yet cookies will not be made unless someone puts the ingredients together in the right order and puts them in the correctly preheated oven. Why should complex things like cells be any different?

In his defense, Mr. Farrell does make one good point. Many believers would rather feel than think. They see logic and reason as being the enemies of God and spirituality because they are used by atheists and they lack any consideration for feelings which is in opposition to a personal deity. What they fail to see is that a personal God is capable of using logic and reason and has endowed such things to us. Feelings are fickle and change very easily and abruptly. Truth, though, doesn't change. And Truth can be discerned through logic and reason.

Patrick of KY 10:54AM October 26, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement